ImageImageImageImageImage

Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
Knick4Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,670
And1: 10,537
Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Location: NYC
 

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#321 » by Knick4Real » Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:46 am

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Knick4Real wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
How about Kanye West? You want him up there too? Kid Rock? Oh, how about Ted Nugent.

How old are you?


If it'll get rid of Trump, I'll give Frosty The Snowman the mic and let him say a few words.
WHATEVER it takes in these desperate times.

And I'm older than most people on this forum. Probably 2nd oldest behind you. :D


Ha. I doubt that.

I Don’t know why you think putting up pos Republicans on our stage to exclusion of Democrats is helpful. It’s not. It actually counterproductive. Think about it.


Who said anything about excluding Democrats?? I never said that at all.

I want ANYBODY featured at the convention whose presence can help get rid of Trump. Not just because they're Democrat but because they're effective.

Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama is technically a Democrat but frequently sides with Trump. He shouldn't be given a slot simply for being a Democrat because his presence won't help the cause. However, ANYBODY else who can actually help the end goal, I say come on down. Let 'em all speak IMO!!
Image
Pointgod
RealGM
Posts: 24,151
And1: 24,468
Joined: Jun 28, 2014

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#322 » by Pointgod » Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:29 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
8516knicks wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
It is going to be that simple really. Show compassion and decency is the right option for a president and for the voters.


After 4 years of Trump and 10 of the tea party, the very appearance of empathy will be shocking!


And therein lies the problem for Americans who need bold help now. This is what the neoliberals want. They have us salivating for any crumbs of normalcy that we will be pacified by the same ol' diluted half-measure policies that have been the emblematic of the Party since LBJ. Wasn't Dubya a "compassionate conservative"? :lol: Anybody who falls for okey doke again, please. Obama was going to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Remember? How'd that work out?

"May I have please some more, sir."

"More? You want MORE??? How dare you!"

Image


Ummm maybe it’s because these things can’t be fixed by snapping your fingers and need to take into account the long term effects. How well did Trump do ending wars when he had a Republican controlled House and Senate? Progress is incremental and the immediate focus needs to be getting rid of the Party that’s actively blocking progress and trying to roll things back.
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,940
And1: 45,616
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#323 » by GONYK » Wed Jul 22, 2020 1:57 pm

Rachel Bitecofer has a great thread that makes a very important point:

Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20

So it's unproductive to think of politicians who agree with you 100% of the time as good, and the ones who don't as the enemy without exception. Not only does that give them more credit than they deserve, but you'll always end up with too many enemies to build a winning coalition that way.

It's the political math that should be focused on. Does alignment on this issue make the math more or less favorable to the overall cause you want implemented.
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#324 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Jul 22, 2020 2:58 pm

Pointgod wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
8516knicks wrote:
After 4 years of Trump and 10 of the tea party, the very appearance of empathy will be shocking!


And therein lies the problem for Americans who need bold help now. This is what the neoliberals want. They have us salivating for any crumbs of normalcy that we will be pacified by the same ol' diluted half-measure policies that have been the emblematic of the Party since LBJ. Wasn't Dubya a "compassionate conservative"? :lol: Anybody who falls for okey doke again, please. Obama was going to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Remember? How'd that work out?

"May I have please some more, sir."

"More? You want MORE??? How dare you!"

Image


Ummm maybe it’s because these things can’t be fixed by snapping your fingers and need to take into account the long term effects. How well did Trump do ending wars when he had a Republican controlled House and Senate? Progress is incremental and the immediate focus needs to be getting rid of the Party that’s actively blocking progress and trying to roll things back.


We’ve been in these wars for 20 years. We aren’t accomplishing anything there. Breaking News: Bin Ladin is dead. What am I missing?

Trump never wanted to end the wars. Please.
Free Palestine
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#325 » by HarthorneWingo » Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:10 pm

Knick4Real wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Knick4Real wrote:
If it'll get rid of Trump, I'll give Frosty The Snowman the mic and let him say a few words.
WHATEVER it takes in these desperate times.

And I'm older than most people on this forum. Probably 2nd oldest behind you. :D


Ha. I doubt that.

I Don’t know why you think putting up pos Republicans on our stage to exclusion of Democrats is helpful. It’s not. It actually counterproductive. Think about it.


Who said anything about excluding Democrats?? I never said that at all.

I want ANYBODY featured at the convention whose presence can help get rid of Trump. Not just because they're Democrat but because they're effective.

Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama is technically a Democrat but frequently sides with Trump. He shouldn't be given a slot simply for being a Democrat because his presence won't help the cause. However, ANYBODY else who can actually help the end goal, I say come on down. Let 'em all speak IMO!!



How about Liz Cheney? She hates Trump’s guts. Would you invite her? George W. Bush? I’m interested in see your list of those Republicans who who you would invite to speak.
Free Palestine
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,759
And1: 12,707
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#326 » by Phish Tank » Wed Jul 22, 2020 3:58 pm

GONYK wrote:
It's the political math that should be focused on. Does alignment on this issue make the math more or less favorable to the overall cause you want implemented.


yep, one of the first things you learn once in Congress. I have a cousin who works for a Senator who explained this exact thing to me when he started a couple years ago (but he gave me game about how the Hill works)
Image
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#327 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:12 pm

Pointgod wrote:
Ummm maybe it’s because these things can’t be fixed by snapping your fingers and need to take into account the long term effects. How well did Trump do ending wars when he had a Republican controlled House and Senate? Progress is incremental and the immediate focus needs to be getting rid of the Party that’s actively blocking progress and trying to roll things back.


Yes. Good sober take on the situation.
User avatar
Knick4Real
General Manager
Posts: 9,670
And1: 10,537
Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Location: NYC
 

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#328 » by Knick4Real » Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:21 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Knick4Real wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Ha. I doubt that.

I Don’t know why you think putting up pos Republicans on our stage to exclusion of Democrats is helpful. It’s not. It actually counterproductive. Think about it.


Who said anything about excluding Democrats?? I never said that at all.

I want ANYBODY featured at the convention whose presence can help get rid of Trump. Not just because they're Democrat but because they're effective.

Sen. Doug Jones of Alabama is technically a Democrat but frequently sides with Trump. He shouldn't be given a slot simply for being a Democrat because his presence won't help the cause. However, ANYBODY else who can actually help the end goal, I say come on down. Let 'em all speak IMO!!



How about Liz Cheney? She hates Trump’s guts. Would you invite her? George W. Bush? I’m interested in see your list of those Republicans who who you would invite to speak.


I'll say once again, I'd give Frosty The Snowman the mic if it would help oust Trump.

Anyway, this is all a moot point. Neither of us is in charge of who will or won't speak during the convention. All we can do is sit back and watch it unfold -- and then GO VOTE!!
Image
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,940
And1: 45,616
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#329 » by GONYK » Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:32 pm

Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Ummm maybe it’s because these things can’t be fixed by snapping your fingers and need to take into account the long term effects. How well did Trump do ending wars when he had a Republican controlled House and Senate? Progress is incremental and the immediate focus needs to be getting rid of the Party that’s actively blocking progress and trying to roll things back.


Yes. Good sober take on the situation.


Yep. Ending wars, healthcare reform, voting overhaul, etc...

They all take time. Even if the person who advocates for that stuff is elected today, you're looking at 2-6 years before it works its way through the legislative body, realigns with the political realities of the moment, and everyone learns what from the original vision can actually get passed.

That's why trying to tie something massive like M4A to Coronavirus as an election issue is not going to happen. Covid will (hopefully) be way behind us by the time the American public would even sniff the beginnings of that type of policy shift.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#330 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 4:54 pm

GONYK wrote:
Clyde_Style wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
Ummm maybe it’s because these things can’t be fixed by snapping your fingers and need to take into account the long term effects. How well did Trump do ending wars when he had a Republican controlled House and Senate? Progress is incremental and the immediate focus needs to be getting rid of the Party that’s actively blocking progress and trying to roll things back.


Yes. Good sober take on the situation.


Yep. Ending wars, healthcare reform, voting overhaul, etc...

They all take time. Even if the person who advocates for that stuff is elected today, you're looking at 2-6 years before it works its way through the legislative body, realigns with the political realities of the moment, and everyone learns what from the original vision can actually get passed.

That's why trying to tie something massive like M4A to Coronavirus as an election issue is not going to happen. Covid will (hopefully) be way behind us by the time the American public would even sniff the beginnings of that type of policy shift.


I say to people all the time to bide their time, take the long view. I also do that with extremists, because I don't have any interest in their short-term agitations.

For example, the guy I know in Florida who is a Trump cultist was always trying to get me to prove why I thought Trump would eventually be charged with serious crimes. Since I knew nothing would appease their incessant quest to find flaws in any argument I would merely say let's see what happens. Let's see what happens when Trump loses his executive immunity whether there were crimes committed or not, because I know what will happen and there is no point in clashing with trolls to dissuade them of their obsessive scalp hunting in the meantime.

Same goes for this election, let's see what options there are to forward progressive agendas once we survive this fascist nightmare, because not surviving it is a possibility and if that happens all the whining in the world will be just that: whining, not winning. If someone doesn't understand there is no option but to win you can't dissuade them of their disaffections. The best you can do is focus on the task at hand and ignore the rest.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#331 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:41 pm

Read on Twitter
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#332 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:45 pm

Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,978
And1: 57,368
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#333 » by robillionaire » Wed Jul 22, 2020 5:59 pm

qanon started as a larp on a popular anonymous image board that serves as a fascist breeding ground and epicenter for nazi activity in the US, I continue to be amazed to this day that anybody took it seriously and believed that it's real
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,940
And1: 45,616
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#334 » by GONYK » Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:03 pm

robillionaire wrote:qanon started as a larp on a popular anonymous image board that serves as a fascist breeding ground and epicenter for nazi activity in the US, I continue to be amazed to this day that anybody took it seriously and believed that it's real


I remember about a year or two ago, before QAnon got banned from Reddit, that one of their big "informants" was dropping "high clearance" info about how Trump was working hand in glove with Mueller while simultaneously whining in another subreddit that his Xbox Live server wasn't working.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#335 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:20 pm

GONYK wrote:
robillionaire wrote:qanon started as a larp on a popular anonymous image board that serves as a fascist breeding ground and epicenter for nazi activity in the US, I continue to be amazed to this day that anybody took it seriously and believed that it's real


I remember about a year ago, before QAnon got banned from Reddit, that one of their big "informants" was dropping "high clearance" info about how Trump was working hand in glove with Mueller while simultaneously whining in another subreddit that his Xbox Live server wasn't working.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

It became pretty clear to me about two years ago there is very little separation between the fantastical idiocy of the Q universe and mainstream GOP rhetoric. The slide into counter-reality disinfo tactics were so prevalent from the top down with Trump tweeting that it become an inexorable black hole that sucked a good part of the GOP's congressmen and senators into its vortex of illogic.

The only true differential was that Q people actually believedthis crap (R.I.P. Earthmansurfer) whereas the GOP leadership mostly knew they were BS'ing for their own political ends. But I think we've seen the result of unrelenting chit talking like this. It results in even the cynical manipulators of crazy logic losing the ability to differentiate between what is fact or fiction. Now the GOP has a number of Q type people in their ranks.

And so goes a good chunk of America. Tens of millions of Americans submitted their brains to this fake news downgrade and now they are functionally incapable of any critical thinking. They've fallen and most of them are never getting back up. But ultimately this is not just a Q or GOP issue. This infection of the brain is not limited just to Trump supporters as the what about Hillary garbage infected minds across the spectrum.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#336 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:26 pm

Read on Twitter


It just occurred to me Geraldo rhymes with pedo. How does someone publicly say denying Maxwell bail is woke politics unless they are so burrowed up Trump's ass they are a rabidly feral species of feces eating cockroach or a pedophile? This is insane stuff. I hope they keep her alive and she spills her guts. Lots of dirty men would be exposed.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#337 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:39 pm

Read on Twitter


laugh tracks! :lol:
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,978
And1: 57,368
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#338 » by robillionaire » Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:51 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
Pointgod wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
And therein lies the problem for Americans who need bold help now. This is what the neoliberals want. They have us salivating for any crumbs of normalcy that we will be pacified by the same ol' diluted half-measure policies that have been the emblematic of the Party since LBJ. Wasn't Dubya a "compassionate conservative"? :lol: Anybody who falls for okey doke again, please. Obama was going to get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Remember? How'd that work out?

"May I have please some more, sir."

"More? You want MORE??? How dare you!"

Image


Ummm maybe it’s because these things can’t be fixed by snapping your fingers and need to take into account the long term effects. How well did Trump do ending wars when he had a Republican controlled House and Senate? Progress is incremental and the immediate focus needs to be getting rid of the Party that’s actively blocking progress and trying to roll things back.


We’ve been in these wars for 20 years. We aren’t accomplishing anything there. Breaking News: Bin Ladin is dead. What am I missing?

Trump never wanted to end the wars. Please.


my thoughts on the "it takes time" vs. "demand better now" conversation

For one, it can't be denied that the current status quo is extreme. The things we are experiencing (do I need to list them all?) are not normal. To change things in this system it can take time. but we can't ignore in that time there will be a lot of preventable deaths. easy to say these things take time but harder to tell that to someone who lost a family member to a preventable illness or someone who had their village bombed. in addition to that, any reforms made in this time can be immediately rolled back or removed by the gop, starting us back at square one. We saw this over the past 4 years. So the question people may begin to ask themselves is "how much time do we have left before it's too late?" and alternatively "how many more?"

the incremental progress I have witnessed over the past couple decades is the incremental erosion of privacy and rights and the incremental rise of a fascist regime and police state and the incremental expansion of income inequality and funneling of wealth to the top 1%. I am not seeing the incremental progress or reasons to be hopeful about the future with the continuation of business as usual; the benefits of doing things the way we have been doing them are not readily apparent. Things are not better or even trending in that direction. They weren't for most people before Trump either. That's why he's in power. The system created the conditions and environment that could allow such a corrupt demagogue to preside over us and I have little doubt that someone much worse than him is coming down the pipeline if we stay the course. Any sigh of relief you have in November should be quickly replaced with concern about what comes next. No going back to brunch this time. The people who put Trump there aren't going to disappear.

For those who are not content with kicking the can down the road for an indeterminate amount of time, who are thoroughly disgusted to their core with this reality we are experiencing and can't live with it another day, we are staring down a contradiction. We can also take the "time" route and wait another 10-15 years for the demographics to change enough to where we MAYBE have the numbers to topple the status quo via electoral means(if the elections aren't obviously rigged with more voter suppression than ever thought possible). by then climate change may already be irreversible and we will be in a complete hellscape somehow even worse than we are experiencing today

The only other option we will have is to stay in the streets day in and day out in protest and to grind the entire system to a halt. no matter who wins this election I anticipate the entire decade of the 2020s to be one of mass sustained protest movements and uprisings as people's lives depend on it. Which is why the oligarchy is already having to ramp up the authority of militarized secret police in response. Good timing for them, because we now see that millions are about to be evicted and foreclosed starting next month, combined with record unemployment and loss of health care tied to that employment which will certainly result in massive medical bankruptcies(an abhorrent concept that should not exist). If we're being honest with ourselves I don't expect this type of militarized police suppression to be much different under Biden either, after seeing how occupy wall street, standing rock, ferguson and baltimore protests were handled under obama. Maybe slightly toned down rhetoric by Biden (obama did call the protesters thugs) but ultimately still pretty brutal. My big question is that under a dem president, will dems still side with protesters and acknowledge these types of federal crackdowns on peaceful protesters are tactics akin to fascism? Or are most just appalled now because it's Trump behind the wheel and not their guy? I hope it's the former, because I'm worried about how bad it will get if there is mostly bipartisan support for the roundups.

so let us vote and plan for the long game, but it's becoming apparent it may also take a bit more persuading than that if we want to secure a habitable planet and a future for humanity that isn't a nightmare. If we can't rely on our politicians to take principled stands on anything clearly it's going to be up to us. To replace them with those who will or take matters into our own hands
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,978
And1: 57,368
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#339 » by robillionaire » Wed Jul 22, 2020 7:08 pm

also I am curious if we wake up in November to a trump victory, for those who believe that if trump wins again "the american experiment is finished" or that it will be catastrophic (I agree with you) if they will consider a change of course from the it takes time principle and consider the need for immediate responses for us to sustain our lives. because at that point you will certainly begin to feel the walls closing in around you. would that change your outlook or approach?
User avatar
j4remi
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 38,253
And1: 20,197
Joined: Jun 23, 2008
         

Re: Democratic Primary Thread: The Deuce 

Post#340 » by j4remi » Wed Jul 22, 2020 7:55 pm

GONYK wrote:Rachel Bitecofer has a great thread that makes a very important point:

Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20
Read on Twitter
?s=20

So it's unproductive to think of politicians who agree with you 100% of the time as good, and the ones who don't as the enemy without exception. Not only does that give them more credit than they deserve, but you'll always end up with too many enemies to build a winning coalition that way.

It's the political math that should be focused on. Does alignment on this issue make the math more or less favorable to the overall cause you want implemented.


This is pretty well recognized and one of the driving forces behind the push by the left to find primary challengers for safe blue seats. Howie Klein has done a pretty good job in his weekly Feldman spots of pointing out times where primary threats have moved representatives on issues (for the best real time example in recent memory; watch the changes in the impeachment discussion and how often localized public opinion polls moved Senators rhetorically until Pelosi finally gave in).

So to drill down on that a bit, while it's important to recognize the differing constituencies and the need to have a blue voter; that's no simple cudgel to hide to behind on each vote. We have to contextualize the decisions a bit to really think about what type of electoral math was being played. Sometimes, a vote is made with constituents in mind and other times...it's about that sweet campaign donor collective. I'd point to Booker's no vote on a pharmaceutical imports bill not long ago (he cited technical problems with the bill but it was received as a spin job); the response he got for it was pretty harsh and a lot of people pointed to his donors. The next time a piece of legislation went up for importing pharmaceutical drugs, Booker's name was attached to it.

One more dig into that one; this survival dynamic is useful. We can't shift Joe Manchin when he curses at Schumer for trying to WHIP his support on a bill; but where you can get a concerted local effort, you can get some changes in legislative approach. I wish I could find the old Klein spots where he was mentioning Hakeem Jeffries asking Pelosi to give him cover on decisions (it's definitely from around the time Pelosi went after the Squad which should align with the Voting Rights Act push). But that was without any primary challenger in place; it was just a rumor that the DSA was looking for one floating around and the fact that AOC was fresh out of the same DSA crew along with some new state reps.
C- Turner | Wiseman
PF- Hunter |Clowney | Fleming
SF- Strus | George
SG- Bridges | Dick | Bogdanovic
PG- Haliburton | Sasser

Return to New York Knicks