HEZI wrote:JayTWill wrote:HEZI wrote:
Nope they can’t be better. With every rotation “solution” a new problem is created so while you think you fixed one thing you do so by breaking something else. That’s because the roster is constructed in such a way that coaching won’t fix the issues.
Nope they don’t have a chance to contend. Thibs is doing his job which is to coach to win every game. That’s what he gets paid to do with each paycheck. He’s not the GM or trainer or doctor or all these other things you believes a coach is responsible for, he just coaches.
The roster will have to be fixed by the same guy who put the team together. At least roster changes are realistic. Expecting an NBA coach to teach these soon to be 30 year olds how to shoot, dribble and defend at this stage in their careers and fix all the problems with the team is unrealistic.
I have never thought any of the Knicks teams in the last 5-6 years had the talent to contend. Not the January 2024 Knicks, not the Decmeber 2024 Knicks. I can see the flaws in the roster the front office constructed with Thibs and things players could be better at individually but the idea that somehow Thibs has found the exact best solution possible to every problem is ridiculous.
As far as improving the team how are roster changes a simple solution? You can't call someone like Mikal a "mid" role-player and then magically turn him into a better player especially when you have almost no assets to attach to him. You can't just magically change players into better players especially when the guys you are trying to move are already in their primes.
What are they supposed to do now? Hope that the Bucks GM saw Brunson and KAT not take this team to another level together and think to himself that maybe he should exchange possibly a top 5 player in Giannis for KAT to try him with an ageing Lillard and a worse supporting cast? Hope that a team gives the Knicks a better player making $23M or less for Mikal just because? Break Mikal up into multiple cheaper pieces that aren't as good as him individually? Trade Brunson who probably has the highest trade value and hope another player fits better with the team?
Explain to me how they will make the roster significantly better with the way you talk about the players some of the vets, the young players that Thibs won't even let touch the court, the limited draft capital available to trade and the limited money to offer. Changing the coach is very easy. You don't have to worry about trade value or the salary cap.
What is your goal? What improvement are you talking about? If the roster isn’t good enough to win a chip then no coach is getting it to win one so what improvement are you even talking about? You just want to change the coach for the sake of making a change but the expectations of the team remain the same. I don’t see what improvements a coach will make that will realistically bring this roster closer to winning a title.
As far as what roster changes need to be made, that’s on the front office and Leon. The same way he was able to pull moves like getting Brunson, getting IHart, getting Donte, getting OG, getting Mikal, getting KAT, it’s up to him to figure that out. Did you see Hartenstein becoming who he became when we signed him? Donte? Did you expect us to get OG? KAT? He’s very capable of making big changes. Did he make it tougher on himself by capping us out and trading almost all of our draft assets? Yes he did, but he put us in that position and now it’s his job to fix it. I don’t have the solution just like you don’t have a coaching solution but your coaching change still leaves us with a roster that isn’t good enough and what I’m saying is the roster will have to be reconstructed whether you make the coaching change or not.
Just because I don't believe this team will win a championship doesn't mean this team can't be better. The way the team has been performing it feels like it is much closer to an average team than it is a championship team. Part of that is the roster. Part of that is the coaching but you are unwilling to question the coaching for some reason.
Brunson, iHart and DDV cost more than what the Knicks have to offer this year. OG was traded for young players with higher trade value than the Knicks current young players that are glued to the bench. KAT and Mikal are part of the flawed roster created this off-season that you place all the blame on the players for. Somehow you are critical of Mikal for being a "mid" role player and then use that as one of the front office's accomplishments when I asked you how to fix the roster.
I have wanted to move on from Thibs prior to this season. Kenny Atkinson was my choice last off-season. His journey reminded me of Kerr's journey into head coaching from the guys he learned under. Johnnie Bryant is a guy I would not mind the Knicks interviewing with his experience in player development to his time with the Knicks and learning under Quin Snyder, Thibs and Atkinson. What has Thibs done this year with this roster that makes him so indispensable in your eyes other than not being Fizdale or having a better record than some of the terrible records Knicks teams have had over the previous couple decades?























