Knicks - Cavs PG II
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- 2010
- RealGM
- Posts: 37,595
- And1: 42,854
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Coming off a helluva game like this, why is the focus on picking Obi apart? Y'all sure know how to fk up a vibe. It's ok to say "I'm not sure what we have in player x yet, but I hope he works out the links."

2024 & 2025 Bubble Champions (Repeat)
1: Thompson | Nembhard | Smart
2: White | Wallace | Clark
3: Dort | Sharpe | Rupert
4: Wembanyama | Green | Bol
5: Gobert | Drummond | Mamukelashvili
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- FutureKnicksGM
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,933
- And1: 1,505
- Joined: Sep 26, 2005
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
IQ sure is confident in his game, and it shows on the court. Having a pg who is a threat to score the ball (especially from 3), that the defense has to respect, completely opened up the offense.
Bullock did his job knocking down 3's. Again, having two shooters in the backcourt, with our two slashing forwards, makes complete logical sense.
RJ did his thing, with his production almost automatic. His touch on his FT's looks good, impressive improvement by him.
Man yall hate Randle, but he played well. One of the few players who can generate a double, and made good shot/pass decisions for the most part.
Mitch was a beast. Probably the best I've seen him play. Was much more disciplined, and was a force on the boards (at least when playing against Thon).
Thibs needs to keep this starting lineup.
Obi is obviously still finding his way on offense, but needs to be more aggressive. He has great floor vision though, with some of his passes special.
Guess Knox ain't complete trash like he was as of two games ago? Good to see him stay aggressive and knock down some shots.
Harper looked like he could be a solid 3rd pg long term.
So we should have the following locked up:
Mitch/Noel
Randle/Obi
RJ/Knox
Bullock/
Quickly/
Again they signed 3 vet guards we didn't need. I expect they will go with Payton at backup 1 (given the organisations hard on for him) and Burks at backup 2 (given he was our big FA signing). To be fair, Payton may be good for Toppin and getting him going in the pick and roll.
Man the Cavs are trash. Okoro was invisible. Lol at wanting to trade picks for Garland. SMH.
Bullock did his job knocking down 3's. Again, having two shooters in the backcourt, with our two slashing forwards, makes complete logical sense.
RJ did his thing, with his production almost automatic. His touch on his FT's looks good, impressive improvement by him.
Man yall hate Randle, but he played well. One of the few players who can generate a double, and made good shot/pass decisions for the most part.
Mitch was a beast. Probably the best I've seen him play. Was much more disciplined, and was a force on the boards (at least when playing against Thon).
Thibs needs to keep this starting lineup.
Obi is obviously still finding his way on offense, but needs to be more aggressive. He has great floor vision though, with some of his passes special.
Guess Knox ain't complete trash like he was as of two games ago? Good to see him stay aggressive and knock down some shots.
Harper looked like he could be a solid 3rd pg long term.
So we should have the following locked up:
Mitch/Noel
Randle/Obi
RJ/Knox
Bullock/
Quickly/
Again they signed 3 vet guards we didn't need. I expect they will go with Payton at backup 1 (given the organisations hard on for him) and Burks at backup 2 (given he was our big FA signing). To be fair, Payton may be good for Toppin and getting him going in the pick and roll.
Man the Cavs are trash. Okoro was invisible. Lol at wanting to trade picks for Garland. SMH.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,598
- And1: 5,733
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Relax guys, I didn't keep track of who was ready to give up on Knox. But you must've been blind not to see the potential despite a young player's second year struggles.
But as I kept saying: 6'10 fluid athlete, good range, soft jumper and floater, good handles. Way to disregard that...
But as I kept saying: 6'10 fluid athlete, good range, soft jumper and floater, good handles. Way to disregard that...
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
spree2kawhi
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,598
- And1: 5,733
- Joined: Mar 01, 2005
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
FutureKnicksGM wrote:Man the Cavs are trash. Okoro was invisible. Lol at wanting to trade picks for Garland. SMH.
We're still only at their level too. Garland will still develop. I like where we are, but they are onto something as well.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- Jstock12
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,058
- And1: 17,879
- Joined: Jun 24, 2012
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
bigfnjoe96 wrote:MaseInYourFace wrote:Randle had 8 assists?! Crazy
.....
Sent from my Pixel 3a using Tapatalk
If he had a higher hairline, wouldn't Randle look a bit like LeBron?

Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
Oscirus
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,530
- And1: 9,536
- Joined: Dec 09, 2011
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
A few things occured to me, not everything agreeable:
1. I dont think that paytons losing his starting job to njury no matter how much we all may want it however
2. Quickley def played himself into the rotation which means that
3. someones minutes are gonna be taken, which Im fine with but still wondering the wisdom of hiring so many pgs.
4. Its ironic that phil was begging for a triangle coach at the same time thibs was begging for this job and it never occured to phil to hire him.
5. Thibs did what everybody wanted him to do with obi. He played obi as much as possible to try and get him going. While Im not at all giving up on him this early, it's quite concerning he's struggling with the cavs b and c team.
6. Knox started off this hot last year and was even rookie of the month, I'll withhold celebrations until he does this consistently over 1 year.
7. Due to all these injuries, i still dont think most of the rotations locked down. I can see barrett and randle def starting but every other position is up for grabs.
1. I dont think that paytons losing his starting job to njury no matter how much we all may want it however
2. Quickley def played himself into the rotation which means that
3. someones minutes are gonna be taken, which Im fine with but still wondering the wisdom of hiring so many pgs.
4. Its ironic that phil was begging for a triangle coach at the same time thibs was begging for this job and it never occured to phil to hire him.
5. Thibs did what everybody wanted him to do with obi. He played obi as much as possible to try and get him going. While Im not at all giving up on him this early, it's quite concerning he's struggling with the cavs b and c team.
6. Knox started off this hot last year and was even rookie of the month, I'll withhold celebrations until he does this consistently over 1 year.
7. Due to all these injuries, i still dont think most of the rotations locked down. I can see barrett and randle def starting but every other position is up for grabs.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- prophet_of_rage
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,196
- And1: 7,414
- Joined: Jan 06, 2005
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
No continuity. You change coaches and FOs every two years and you get nowhere.knicks94 wrote:The EC is not that difficult of a conference to have success in.Don’t know why we have always had trouble putting together a decent season.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,113
- And1: 36,154
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
How did Okoro and Dotson do? Didn’t hear their names much
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- FreeSpiritNY
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,917
- And1: 1,286
- Joined: Mar 05, 2012
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Fat Kat wrote:How did Okoro and Dotson do? Didn’t hear their names much
OKoro did worse than ok and DOTson could not live up to his name Getting the dot in the hole. Quickley is quickley changing the heart of many and roaring for that starting position.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
YouthMovement
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,096
- And1: 5,068
- Joined: Jun 27, 2009
- Contact:
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
i see some mike conley in IQs game
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
cgmw
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,545
- And1: 10,445
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Encouraged by Knox but flashes are flashes, not consistency. Skeptical he has the same confidence and flow once Payton, Burks, Noel are starting again or when the opposing team has NBA stars checking him.
Knox looks like a really talented loser without the self-confidence to assert himself. Hopefully he’s like one of those super hot librarians who finally takes her glasses off and lets her hair down.
Knox looks like a really talented loser without the self-confidence to assert himself. Hopefully he’s like one of those super hot librarians who finally takes her glasses off and lets her hair down.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
cgmw
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,545
- And1: 10,445
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
I wonder if Thibs is having a positive effect on Randle. Or maybe it’s that Payton was out. Think we’ll ever see 8 assists from him again?
Obi looks like he has bad posture and no confidence.
Obi looks like he has bad posture and no confidence.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
whocares1
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,125
- And1: 6,264
- Joined: Oct 31, 2014
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
blueNorange wrote:one thing from all the preseason games, thibs runs plays the entire game ... very little isolation ball.
But plays can be made for isolation opportunities, and players can play as a team without any play calling. So lack of isolation doesn’t automatically mean more play calling.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
oldshoolballer
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,601
- And1: 3,208
- Joined: Nov 24, 2018
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
cgmw wrote:I wonder if Thibs is having a positive effect on Randle. Or maybe it’s that Payton was out. Think we’ll ever see 8 assists from him again?
Obi looks like he has bad posture and no confidence.
I know it's sacrilege to say anything good about Randle on this forum but he just looks better to me under Thibs. Less boneheaded plays. Not as selfish. To early yet we will see.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
Montmorencie
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,749
- And1: 1,188
- Joined: Jul 07, 2020
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
If we play IQ as starter all the time he will be ROY contender. The guy plays hella smart and makes everyone around him better, he plays defense, he is not limited only to shooting or dribbling, he is doing both. I might even say pure talent wise he looks to be our brightest prospect.
Thibs needs to step up with authority and start the season with IQ. Feck Elfrid, feck Frank. Go back to them if IQ fails. But absolutely no reason not to start him given his current shape. He looks like a beast.
Thibs needs to step up with authority and start the season with IQ. Feck Elfrid, feck Frank. Go back to them if IQ fails. But absolutely no reason not to start him given his current shape. He looks like a beast.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
cgmw
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,545
- And1: 10,445
- Joined: Jul 23, 2003
- Location: Winning now since 1973
- Contact:
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Montmorencie wrote:If we play IQ as starter all the time he will be ROY contender. The guy plays hella smart and makes everyone around him better, he plays defense, he is not limited only to shooting or dribbling, he is doing both. I might even say pure talent wise he looks to be our brightest prospect.
Thibs needs to step up with authority and start the season with IQ. Feck Elfrid, feck Frank. Go back to them if IQ fails. But absolutely no reason not to start him given his current shape. He looks like a beast.
Thibs will end up starting Rivers at PG. The NYK point guard competition has a high frequency but very low wavelength. IQ doesn’t need to be a beast to win out, he just needs to keep spiking a few good performances. Of course Thibs has a history of preferring vets.
"Sell the team. Sell the team. Sell the team."
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
whocares1
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,125
- And1: 6,264
- Joined: Oct 31, 2014
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
oldshoolballer wrote:cgmw wrote:I wonder if Thibs is having a positive effect on Randle. Or maybe it’s that Payton was out. Think we’ll ever see 8 assists from him again?
Obi looks like he has bad posture and no confidence.
I know it's sacrilege to say anything good about Randle on this forum but he just looks better to me under Thibs. Less boneheaded plays. Not as selfish. To early yet we will see.
It’s not about being under Thibs. That second game against the Pistons was not good. It’s the spacing and play of IQ that’s allowed him to have more opportunities passing and scoring the ball in easier situations. IQ is not a guy that holds the ball long either so the constant exchanging of the ball is influencing Randle to be more of a team player.
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
jstudabaka
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,509
- And1: 706
- Joined: Mar 21, 2010
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Knox was looking like Klay Thompson out there 
I actually would not be surprised if IQ starts. (That should be his nickname btw)
I actually would not be surprised if IQ starts. (That should be his nickname btw)
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
- Reign23
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,748
- And1: 12,573
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
- Location: Germany.
-
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
just finished. If Quickley and Mitch don't start game 1, I don't know what to say anymore.
we have to get rid of Payton and Randle SO badly.
we have to get rid of Payton and Randle SO badly.
formerly known as knickst4pe
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
-
YungKnicks
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,044
- And1: 481
- Joined: Feb 11, 2019
Re: Knicks - Cavs PG II
Obi will be fine, he's cerebral, smart, has good vision, gives good effort on defense, ia a team player. Doesn't make bone headed turnover plays like Randle does. He really just needs to develop a handle to create space on the wing so he can pull up on jumpers. That's something that Randle actually can do. I have confidence he will develop that throughout the year.











