GONYK wrote:dakomish23 wrote:Oscirus wrote:if only we had a 3 and d guy that we couldve re-signed last year on the cheap.
BINGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Bullock has been terrible for Dallas and $10M isn't cheap for what he's been giving them.
Just play Grimes.
R. Bullock, .J. Randle, .R. Barrett
1594 mins - the largest 3 man combo we had last year
110.4 ORTG
106.5 DRTG
3.9 NRTG
R. Bullock, .J. Randle
1811 mins - the 2nd largest 2 man combo we had last year
109.5 ORTG
106.3 DRTG
3.2 NRTG
R. Bullock, .R. Barrett
1652 mins - the 3rd largest 2 man combo we had last year
110.2 ORTG
106.7 DRTG
3.5 NRTG
But hey, I’m sure his more expensive replacement is doing well with our two main players, right?
E. Fournier, .J. Randle, .R. Barrett
910 mins - highest mins for a 3 man combo this year
108.8 ORTG
114.3 DRTG
-5.5 NRTG
E. Fournier, .J. Randle
1243 mins - highest mins for a 2 man combo this year
107.3 ORTG
111.7 DRTG
-4.4 NRTG
E. Fournier, .R. Barrett
959 mins - 3rd highest mins for a 2 man combo this year
108.0 ORTG
114.2 DRTG
-6.2 NRTG
Money well spent b/c the other guy isn’t doing well on a different team in a different system with different PT. Right???
What does what he has done for DAL matter when discussing keeping him in our system when he was good for us and was a good fit with our two franchise players?
Why settle for just one in Grimes when you could have had two of this archetype that clearly fits well with your 2 main guys?
Context has been and forever will be the enemy of arguments trying to defend bad decisions by this FO.