ImageImageImageImageImage

1/4/08: 8:30 PM EST - Knicks at Spurs Game Thread

Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, dakomish23, GONYK, mpharris36

CDAZ
Head Coach
Posts: 7,313
And1: 2,717
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Location: Harlem NYC

 

Post#341 » by CDAZ » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:55 am

KrAzY DeMoN wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



no, take the homer glasses off


I don't wear glasses and after seeing the replay 6 times I could see bowen hit JC on the right hand. JC was dribbling with his left and was trying to go for a shot but Bowen smacked his right hand and that's how JC lost the ball. It was a foul.
MrCheerios
Analyst
Posts: 3,009
And1: 887
Joined: Jun 30, 2005
Location: New York

 

Post#342 » by MrCheerios » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:56 am

optimusadl wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



They cant shoot. We dont need them to be like Michael Redd but dam. Balkman is actually scared to shoot.

I swear if we could get Cook and Davis from Miami for Randolph and Balkman I would **** myself.

You're overrating Davis. He's a completely average player that doesn't have the high IQ to make up for it.
User avatar
KrAzY DeMoN
Veteran
Posts: 2,573
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 26, 2002
Location: NYC

 

Post#343 » by KrAzY DeMoN » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:56 am

Clincher wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


You can laugh but the Knicks are this bad that teams who are viewed highly should be destroying them.

uhm no, a 50 point loss is the same as a 1 point loss. a loss=a loss. Plus the spurs are so experienced and have heart, they would never let the clock run out or run an iso play to get the lead. Who won the game tonight? Finley, from the corner...
CDAZ
Head Coach
Posts: 7,313
And1: 2,717
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Location: Harlem NYC

 

Post#344 » by CDAZ » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:56 am

KOA wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Are you serious? I hope your joking because your post would mean than Q Brick and Air Jeffries can score better than Balkman and Collins... :crazy:


:clap: thanks
User avatar
KrAzY DeMoN
Veteran
Posts: 2,573
And1: 6
Joined: Jun 26, 2002
Location: NYC

 

Post#345 » by KrAzY DeMoN » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:58 am

CDAZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I don't wear glasses and after seeing the replay 6 times I could see bowen hit JC on the right hand. JC was dribbling with his left and was trying to go for a shot but Bowen smacked his right hand and that's how JC lost the ball. It was a foul.


love tap, smack? :crazy:
CDAZ
Head Coach
Posts: 7,313
And1: 2,717
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Location: Harlem NYC

 

Post#346 » by CDAZ » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:59 am

KrAzY DeMoN wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



love tap, smack? :crazy:


:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: Alright man. Whatever you say. If that was Wade and not JC it would've been a flagrant 2
GuyverADL
Banned User
Posts: 18,193
And1: 15
Joined: Dec 03, 2006
Location: HOF

 

Post#347 » by GuyverADL » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:59 am

MrCheerios wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


You're overrating Davis. He's a completely average player that doesn't have the high IQ to make up for it.


He is an expiring and can shoot and play better defense than Richardson.

Im telling you.

Curry
Lee
Davis
Crawford
Robinson

We could actually shoot teams into oblivion
Clincher
General Manager
Posts: 8,258
And1: 820
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
       

 

Post#348 » by Clincher » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:00 am

KrAzY DeMoN wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


uhm no, a 50 point loss is the same as a 1 point loss. a loss=a loss. Plus the spurs are so experienced and have heart, they would never let the clock run out or run an iso play to get the lead. Who won the game tonight? Finley, from the corner...

a 50 pt loss is nowhere near the same as a 1 point loss besides in the standings. If you were talking about a bad team like Seattle winning by a small margin thats ok but high expectations are on the Spurs to take care of business and they didnt look too impressive in my eyes tonight.
DDV
General Manager
Posts: 9,244
And1: 0
Joined: May 25, 2005

 

Post#349 » by DDV » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:00 am

Clincher wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


The Knicks are pretty damn bad man, the Kings blew us out on our home court when we had Z-Bo and they had no Bibby, SAR, Artest or K-Martin.

Spurs have to bust open the crap teams like us if they want to be considered a contender for the title, especially with the way Boston destroyed us.


the spurs dont try that hard in the regular season,they haevnt in a few years because thye have a older team who needs rest

they start playing hard every night in april

and it works for them
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#350 » by moocow007 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:03 am

DDV wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



the spurs dont try that hard in the regular season,they haevnt in a few years because thye have a older team who needs rest

they start playing hard every night in april

and it works for them


Don't think that's the only reason this game was close. The Knicks match up well against the Spurs. And with Ginobili out it made it that much harder for the Spurs to really go on any kinda of offensive spurt which is usually what causes the Knicks to rollover and give up.
User avatar
ss1986v2
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,635
And1: 1
Joined: Mar 07, 2004
Location: San Antonio, Tx
 

 

Post#351 » by ss1986v2 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:05 am

Clincher wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


a 50 pt loss is nowhere near the same as a 1 point loss besides in the standings. If you were talking about a bad team like Seattle winning by a small margin thats ok but high expectations are on the Spurs to take care of business and they didnt look too impressive in my eyes tonight.

and thats all that matters...
Stupidity Should be Painful!
CDAZ
Head Coach
Posts: 7,313
And1: 2,717
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Location: Harlem NYC

 

Post#352 » by CDAZ » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:05 am

moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Don't think that's the only reason this game was close. The Knicks match up well against the Spurs. And with Ginobili out it made it that much harder for the Spurs to really go on any kinda of offensive spurt which is usually what causes the Knicks to rollover and give up.


Also Zeke kept Q on the bench.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#353 » by moocow007 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:06 am

CDAZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Also Zeke kept Q on the bench.


True. True.
midtown
Veteran
Posts: 2,738
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 03, 2004
 

 

Post#354 » by midtown » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:08 am

moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Don't think that's the only reason this game was close. The Knicks match up well against the Spurs. And with Ginobili out it made it that much harder for the Spurs to really go on any kinda of offensive spurt which is usually what causes the Knicks to rollover and give up.


Agreed. Knicks showed up tonight but couldnt finish, still lost and now that has given Mr Delusional a chance to say "we were right there with the defending champions. That is evident progress"

Dolan must be so proud :banghead:
CDAZ
Head Coach
Posts: 7,313
And1: 2,717
Joined: Dec 13, 2004
Location: Harlem NYC

 

Post#355 » by CDAZ » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:12 am

moocow007 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



True. True.


I hope that means he's starting to understand just how useless Q is to this team
Clincher
General Manager
Posts: 8,258
And1: 820
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
       

 

Post#356 » by Clincher » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:12 am

ss1986v2 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


and thats all that matters...

Impressing matters in my eyes too as if you play a superior team to us this way, your not gonna win.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#357 » by moocow007 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:14 am

CDAZ wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I hope that means he's starting to understand just how useless Q is to this team


Let's hope so cause watching Q these days is like watching a couple of old ladies digging through the bargain bin at Marshalls.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#358 » by moocow007 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:15 am

ss1986v2 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-


and thats all that matters...


And if the Spurs blew out NY my guess is that then the spread would matter.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,264
And1: 25,725
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

 

Post#359 » by moocow007 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:19 am

Curry just came out and said that being the focal point of the offense was a big factor in his great all around game.
ctorres
RealGM
Posts: 17,938
And1: 6,148
Joined: Jun 04, 2005

 

Post#360 » by ctorres » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:21 am

So Basically, Curry only wants to rebound and play defense if he gets a lot of shots.

Return to New York Knicks