GONYK wrote:earthmansurfer wrote:Kinglee wrote:Just give Jordan Hill time
Just give Iman Shumpert time
Just give Danilo Gallinari time
Just give Channing Frye time
Just give David Lee time
Just give Nate Robinson time
You know every single one of those players showed what they can and did become in their rookie year?
-Jordan Hill had a nice midrange jumper and nothing else. What did he show later in his career?
-Iman Shumpert showed he had no court vision, couldn't break down a defense, but he was athletic, played defense and people was high on tall point guards. What changed?
-David Lee was a rebound machine that can finish at the basket. What changed? He developed a midrange jumper, but never learned to play defense. He got 20/10 off energy which is why we got rid of him for Amare because 20 points off just being active is different than bein able to go get your own basket
-Gallinari was a 6'11 small forward with an awkward dribble that got him to the freethrow line, good passing, and a good jumper. He's still that same player.
Talent is displayed from the beginning, regardless of what the numbers say. Your eyes show you what a player is capable of. Will they become a superstar or role player remains to be seen, but the talent can be viewed from day 1. There is no player in the league that has become a completely different player than what they showed they could be or were before they got into the NBA.
Once again, debate me with facts or get off me.
You list examples of some players who didn‘t improve much. That is not proof of anything, except that these guys didn‘t improve, nevermind that 3 depended on athleticism and 2 were badly hurt.
Just stop already.
The list also doesn't include any teenagers
But he can see everything no matter the age. We should make him our elementary school scout.