moocow007 wrote:As far as the Wolves and Thibs failures...
And the Wolves have done what since Thibs was fired? They've actually gotten worse (yeah they really have). It is quite possible that its just a bad team and that there's not anything anyone could have done to make them any better. Maybe, just maybe, the great Karl Anthony Towns just simply is not a player that you can win with as a centerpiece of your team? Something to consider for those that ran Carmelo Anthony out of town but want Towns in a Knicks uniform?
So, yes, Thibs has his faults, may very much be overrated and his system may not ideally fit the modern NBA but the Wolves tenure isn't dead on proof cause that was just an ass team that has turned into a bigger ass since he left. Before anyone says anything about Thibs the GM...see Phil Jackson (both made the same amount of sense and resulted in the same kind of fruitlessness).
And no im not saying the Knicks should hire him but folks getting too carried away here.
Yeah that’s my thing too it’s hard to judge him because he went to the wolves. That’s like saying D’antoni is a bad coach because of what happened when he coached the Knicks. D’antoni is a flawed coach, but the FO never gave him what he needed to even halfway succeed except for half a season of Amare before the Melo trade. Thibs went to Minny and then as a FO made trades and FA signing to try and get the people he needed. However, even his older players were well
old, and well it was a mess.
His results in the front office was abysmal and he should own all blame for that. However, his coaching tenure might not have been his fault only. He was able to get some short term success as a coach with Jimmy, but Jimmy hated his team mates.
A more realistic approach is to say Thibs is a flawed coach, but he’s not a outright bad coach. We’ve had outright bad coaches in Fisher, Hornacek, and Fizdale. There is a push for Kenny Atkinson too and he is also a flawed coach. Both of them are examples of pick your poisons.