3/10 knicks vs kings 10:30pm est

[WaltFrazier]

Delon Wright quietly had a nice stint there

[thebuzzardman]

I challenge you to actually talk basketball, Buzz.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Yes , let’s discuss a meaningless win against a bad Kings team and project all sorts of things from it.

we can beat the tar out of bad teams at least lol

Blueprint!

[prophet_of_rage]

Who sucks more, Randle or Brunson?

I challenge you to actually talk basketball, Buzz.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Yes , let’s discuss a meaningless win against a bad Kings team and project all sorts of things from it.

Let's. That's the whole point of this board. If you didagree that there is anything to be taken from this game then you must be okay with all that Thibs and the Knicks are doing otherwise, right?

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

[JayTWill]

I didn't know Skal Labissiere was in the league again

[WaltFrazier]

Really nice to see Mikal and OG play great in the same game

[Capn'O]

Delon Wright quietly had a nice stint there

He's always been a solid player.

[matchman]

22 threes by 9 different players not named Brunson. Such a cool game to watch.

[Jeffrey]

I liked this game very much... we were distributing, everyone was part of the offensive game plan.

[baldur]

Do you think knicks would reach 54 wins?

[thebuzzardman]

Do you think knicks would reach 54 wins?

No

[Butch718]

Like Knick fans using this game as a barometer for their offensive struggles during the season are dumber than rocks. This is a bad Sac team without its best player. This performance isn’t indicative of their offense being better without Brunson. Stupid stupid and stupid.

It isn't the result. It is the methodology. What's funny is that the same posters who complain about Thibs offence when Brunson is there. (Don't get KAT, get Mikal moving, more threes) are seeing it now. But simplistic thinking says people must be arguing Brunson sucks. No. There is a better way to play that will benefit the team in the playoffs.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Dude, it’s against the Kings minus their best player.

2nd, we’ve seen them play well offensively with Brunson in spurts throughout the season. One of them was against the Griz at the Garden.

If we see a basic trend of games where the offense is consistently fluid without Brunson then get back to me. This offense looked really **** against the Clippers minus Brunson, and I didn’t hear a peep out of you guys.

The overreactions are just **** mind numbingly stupid.

[prophet_of_rage]

Like Knick fans using this game as a barometer for their offensive struggles during the season are dumber than rocks. This is a bad Sac team without its best player. This performance isn’t indicative of their offense being better without Brunson. Stupid stupid and stupid.

It isn't the result. It is the methodology. What's funny is that the same posters who complain about Thibs offence when Brunson is there. (Don't get KAT, get Mikal moving, more threes) are seeing it now. But simplistic thinking says people must be arguing Brunson sucks. No. There is a better way to play that will benefit the team in the playoffs.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Dude, it’s against the Kings minus their best player.

2nd, we’ve seen them play well offensively with Brunson in spurts throughout the season. One of them was against the Griz at the Garden.

If we see a basic trend of games where the offense is consistently fluid without Brunson then get back to me. This offense looked really **** against the Clippers minus Brunson, and I didn’t hear a peep out of you guys.

The overreactions are just **** mind numbingly stupid.

I didn't watch the Clippers game. So I have no comments on it. I have no idea what the offence looked like.

But this board hues and cries about everything. Being happy for ball movement is what you think is so stupid?

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

[Butch718]

It isn't the result. It is the methodology. What's funny is that the same posters who complain about Thibs offence when Brunson is there. (Don't get KAT, get Mikal moving, more threes) are seeing it now. But simplistic thinking says people must be arguing Brunson sucks. No. There is a better way to play that will benefit the team in the playoffs.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Dude, it’s against the Kings minus their best player.

2nd, we’ve seen them play well offensively with Brunson in spurts throughout the season. One of them was against the Griz at the Garden.

If we see a basic trend of games where the offense is consistently fluid without Brunson then get back to me. This offense looked really **** against the Clippers minus Brunson, and I didn’t hear a peep out of you guys.

The overreactions are just **** mind numbingly stupid.

I didn't watch the Clippers game. So I have no comments on it. I have no idea what the offence looked like.

But this board hues and cries about everything. Being happy for ball movement is what you think is so stupid?

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app

Nice try attempting to move the goal posts.

I never said being happy for ball movement was stupid. I just think that it’s idiotic for posters to suggest (and y’all know who you are) that the offense flows much better without Brunson. It’s not even a small sample size, it’s one damn game against a really poor defensive team.

[WaltFrazier]

Even the Kings announcers are talking about how Thibs doesn't go to his bench.

Turned out no Knick played 40 minutes.