ImageImageImageImageImage

Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread

Moderators: dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Deeeez Knicks

navyblue
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 5,885
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3781 » by navyblue » Fri Dec 27, 2013 4:22 pm

Jay10 wrote:which team(s) would benefit from having both tyson and bargnani on their roster?

rockets: i don't think tyson would complain if he were to come off the bench behind dwight; bargnani wouldn't get in dwight's way, since he's able to shoot from the perimeter.

Houston has 2 players making close to 20 mil (howard/harden) then have lin and asik making 8 per. rest of their roster is minimum/rookie contract players, no one else makes more than 1.5. its going to be pretty hard to make salaries work with them.
User avatar
iAdoreeKnicks
Analyst
Posts: 3,514
And1: 5,105
Joined: Apr 09, 2013
Location: Girl Knicks Fan.
       

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3782 » by iAdoreeKnicks » Fri Dec 27, 2013 5:01 pm

@ESPNSteinLine: Knicks owner James Dolan told his players Thursday no trades or changes to coaching staff are forthcoming.
User avatar
MKCATL
Starter
Posts: 2,337
And1: 707
Joined: Feb 10, 2004

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3783 » by MKCATL » Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:39 pm

Say we continue down the same path, wouldn't it'd be wise to try and move Chandler and Bargs at the deadline for 2015 draft picks, Which would gives us assets to move over the offseason along with our own 2015 pick?
"I am by no means an expert in basketball." -James Dolan
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3784 » by Marty McFly » Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:45 pm

MKCATL wrote:Say we continue down the same path, wouldn't it'd be wise to try and move Chandler and Bargs at the deadline for 2015 draft picks, Which would gives us assets to move over the offseason along with our own 2015 pick?


there's nothing wise about moving draft picks. nothing.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3785 » by Marty McFly » Fri Dec 27, 2013 9:48 pm

CP3Melo wrote:@ESPNSteinLine: Knicks owner James Dolan told his players Thursday no trades or changes to coaching staff are forthcoming.


as far as i'm concerned, what this entails is this team needs to show significant improvement by the trade deadline. he's giving them a chance. i fully expect the key pieces to be gone by the trade deadline if this team hasn't improved.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
jdm_dc_fan
Senior
Posts: 639
And1: 402
Joined: Sep 08, 2012

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3786 » by jdm_dc_fan » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:30 pm

Marty McFly wrote:
CP3Melo wrote:@ESPNSteinLine: Knicks owner James Dolan told his players Thursday no trades or changes to coaching staff are forthcoming.


as far as i'm concerned, what this entails is this team needs to show significant improvement by the trade deadline. he's giving them a chance. i fully expect the key pieces to be gone by the trade deadline if this team hasn't improved.

Who's gonna want amarie's contract? bargnani's? You have to throw in incentive to get rid of their contracts. NYK FO messed up bad.
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3787 » by Marty McFly » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:40 pm

jdm_dc_fan wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
CP3Melo wrote:@ESPNSteinLine: Knicks owner James Dolan told his players Thursday no trades or changes to coaching staff are forthcoming.


as far as i'm concerned, what this entails is this team needs to show significant improvement by the trade deadline. he's giving them a chance. i fully expect the key pieces to be gone by the trade deadline if this team hasn't improved.

Who's gonna want amarie's contract? bargnani's? You have to throw in incentive to get rid of their contracts. NYK FO messed up bad.


who said amare or bargs are key pieces? I'm talking melo, shumpert, j.r. (even as the dog **** those two have been playing at been playing at) felton and tyson.

amare nor bargs are going to land us anything significant at this point, and the only players worth trading that would land you anything significant at that point if this team hasn't righted the ship by then are those i just mentioned.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
jdm_dc_fan
Senior
Posts: 639
And1: 402
Joined: Sep 08, 2012

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3788 » by jdm_dc_fan » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:00 pm

Marty McFly wrote:
jdm_dc_fan wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
as far as i'm concerned, what this entails is this team needs to show significant improvement by the trade deadline. he's giving them a chance. i fully expect the key pieces to be gone by the trade deadline if this team hasn't improved.

Who's gonna want amarie's contract? bargnani's? You have to throw in incentive to get rid of their contracts. NYK FO messed up bad.


who said amare or bargs are key pieces? I'm talking melo, shumpert, j.r. (even as the dog **** those two have been playing at been playing at) felton and tyson.

amare nor bargs are going to land us anything significant at this point, and the only players worth trading that would land you anything significant at that point if this team hasn't righted the ship by then are those i just mentioned.

The only players worth anything is melo, jr, chandler and shump to an extent. Melo if traded means rebuild with little assets unless danny throws his picks our way, which he wont. Tim looks like a good developing player but like I said still developing. his value is mostly educated speculation. Chandler is only valuable to teams on the brink of a top playoff team. It's a shame he's getting paid too much or calls would be coming in for him every day. Chandler on miami would lock them in for championships for years to come. On okc, spurs etc. Now shumpert his stock is at an all time low. He had a better rookie season then this years season after an injury? And the secretiveness of his knee? all signs show that shumpert has something going on.
jdm_dc_fan
Senior
Posts: 639
And1: 402
Joined: Sep 08, 2012

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3789 » by jdm_dc_fan » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:02 pm

jdm_dc_fan wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
jdm_dc_fan wrote:Who's gonna want amarie's contract? bargnani's? You have to throw in incentive to get rid of their contracts. NYK FO messed up bad.


who said amare or bargs are key pieces? I'm talking melo, shumpert, j.r. (even as the dog **** those two have been playing at been playing at) felton and tyson.

amare nor bargs are going to land us anything significant at this point, and the only players worth trading that would land you anything significant at that point if this team hasn't righted the ship by then are those i just mentioned.

The only players worth anything is melo, Hjr, chandler and shump to an extent. Melo if traded means rebuild with little assets unless danny throws his picks our way, which he wont. Tim looks like a good developing player but like I said still developing. his value is mostly educated speculation. Chandler is only valuable to teams on the brink of a top playoff team. It's a shame he's getting paid too much or calls would be coming in for him every day. Chandler on miami would lock them in for championships for years to come. On okc, spurs etc. Now shumpert his stock is at an all time low. He had a better rookie season then this years season after an injury? And the secretiveness of his knee? all signs show that shumpert has something going on.
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3790 » by Marty McFly » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:56 pm

jdm_dc_fan wrote:The only players worth anything is melo, jr, chandler and shump to an extent. Melo if traded means rebuild with little assets unless danny throws his picks our way, which he wont. Tim looks like a good developing player but like I said still developing. his value is mostly educated speculation. Chandler is only valuable to teams on the brink of a top playoff team. It's a shame he's getting paid too much or calls would be coming in for him every day. Chandler on miami would lock them in for championships for years to come. On okc, spurs etc. Now shumpert his stock is at an all time low. He had a better rookie season then this years season after an injury? And the secretiveness of his knee? all signs show that shumpert has something going on.


1. I'm not interested in trading tim jr at all. he's young, cheap has some upside.

2. you don't need alot of assets to rebuild. not to start anyway. I'm in favor of doing everything we can to get our pick(s) back from the nuggets by moving whatever assets we get from whatever team(s) we trade melo and chandler to the nuggets. if that's not a possibility, then you try to make it work with some other team (the hawks just lost horford, maybe they'd take melo for those net picks) that might have a pick projected in the lottery worth trade melo and chandler for. if that's not possible then you look to some team that wants to be put over the hump in the pla offs and has good young player(s) the knicks may want to piece together their team with.

we'll have our pick in 2015 (so we tank) and capsace (you gun for kyrie) in 2015.

the rest maybe key playoff teams would be interested in those other ones. i don't care much for them either way.


rebuilding wouldn't be that difficult if it's done right.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
jdm_dc_fan
Senior
Posts: 639
And1: 402
Joined: Sep 08, 2012

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3791 » by jdm_dc_fan » Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:22 am

Marty McFly wrote:
jdm_dc_fan wrote:The only players worth anything is melo, jr, chandler and shump to an extent. Melo if traded means rebuild with little assets unless danny throws his picks our way, which he wont. Tim looks like a good developing player but like I said still developing. his value is mostly educated speculation. Chandler is only valuable to teams on the brink of a top playoff team. It's a shame he's getting paid too much or calls would be coming in for him every day. Chandler on miami would lock them in for championships for years to come. On okc, spurs etc. Now shumpert his stock is at an all time low. He had a better rookie season then this years season after an injury? And the secretiveness of his knee? all signs show that shumpert has something going on.


1. I'm not interested in trading tim jr at all. he's young, cheap has some upside.

2. you don't need alot of assets to rebuild. not to start anyway. I'm in favor of doing everything we can to get our pick(s) back from the nuggets by moving whatever assets we get from whatever team(s) we trade melo and chandler to the nuggets. if that's not a possibility, then you try to make it work with some other team (the hawks just lost horford, maybe they'd take melo for those net picks) that might have a pick projected in the lottery worth trade melo and chandler for. if that's not possible then you look to some team that wants to be put over the hump in the pla offs and has good young player(s) the knicks may want to piece together their team with.

we'll have our pick in 2015 (so we tank) and capsace (you gun for kyrie) in 2015.

the rest maybe key playoff teams would be interested in those other ones. i don't care much for them either way.


rebuilding wouldn't be that difficult if it's done right.

Your plan is too reliant on other teams doing things that would be considered highly unlikely.
User avatar
Marty McFly
RealGM
Posts: 26,636
And1: 9,348
Joined: Sep 15, 2009
     

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3792 » by Marty McFly » Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:40 am

jdm_dc_fan wrote:
Marty McFly wrote:
jdm_dc_fan wrote:The only players worth anything is melo, jr, chandler and shump to an extent. Melo if traded means rebuild with little assets unless danny throws his picks our way, which he wont. Tim looks like a good developing player but like I said still developing. his value is mostly educated speculation. Chandler is only valuable to teams on the brink of a top playoff team. It's a shame he's getting paid too much or calls would be coming in for him every day. Chandler on miami would lock them in for championships for years to come. On okc, spurs etc. Now shumpert his stock is at an all time low. He had a better rookie season then this years season after an injury? And the secretiveness of his knee? all signs show that shumpert has something going on.


1. I'm not interested in trading tim jr at all. he's young, cheap has some upside.

2. you don't need alot of assets to rebuild. not to start anyway. I'm in favor of doing everything we can to get our pick(s) back from the nuggets by moving whatever assets we get from whatever team(s) we trade melo and chandler to the nuggets. if that's not a possibility, then you try to make it work with some other team (the hawks just lost horford, maybe they'd take melo for those net picks) that might have a pick projected in the lottery worth trade melo and chandler for. if that's not possible then you look to some team that wants to be put over the hump in the pla offs and has good young player(s) the knicks may want to piece together their team with.

we'll have our pick in 2015 (so we tank) and capsace (you gun for kyrie) in 2015.

the rest maybe key playoff teams would be interested in those other ones. i don't care much for them either way.


rebuilding wouldn't be that difficult if it's done right.

Your plan is too reliant on other teams doing things that would be considered highly unlikely.


as if anything we talk about in this thread are anymore likely. point is, there are options.
Guano wrote:Fourni3r forgetting he has Bob cousy handles

Woodsanity wrote:Imagine trusting a team with World B Flat on it without Lebron keeping him in check.
NOOB77
General Manager
Posts: 9,165
And1: 3,288
Joined: Aug 17, 2007
   

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3793 » by NOOB77 » Sat Dec 28, 2013 3:11 am

Call up Portland and offer them Tyson for Robin Lopez, Thomas Robinson and CJ McCollum....

Do you think Portland says yes?
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,821
And1: 15,321
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3794 » by ibraheim718 » Sat Dec 28, 2013 3:49 am

NYKfan77 wrote:Call up Portland and offer them Tyson for Robin Lopez, Thomas Robinson and CJ McCollum....

Do you think Portland says yes?


They say hell no. Lopez is having a good year and he's younger and more durable and McCollum was their lottery pick.
Mars_Blackmon
Banned User
Posts: 6,098
And1: 2,263
Joined: Apr 17, 2013

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3795 » by Mars_Blackmon » Sat Dec 28, 2013 3:58 am

Trade Tyson to a team trying to win now, get back a young guy and a pick
Trade Melo to LAC for Blake, flip Blake for picks/youth
Trade JR to a team in need of scoring
Trade Felton to a team needing a back up PG get back a 2nd rounder
Flip Shumpert for a young guy struggling who needs a change of scenery(Shump for Kidd-Gilchrist maybe)

Let everyone else expire

I'm gonna put something together now
navyblue
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,687
And1: 5,885
Joined: Nov 04, 2013

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3796 » by navyblue » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:09 am

Mars_Blackmon wrote:Trade Tyson to a team trying to win now, get back a young guy and a pick
Trade Melo to LAC for Blake, flip Blake for picks/youth
Trade JR to a team in need of scoring
Trade Felton to a team needing a back up PG get back a 2nd rounder
Flip Shumpert for a young guy struggling who needs a change of scenery(Shump for Kidd-Gilchrist maybe)

Let everyone else expire

I'm gonna put something together now

everything except the shump trade is unlikely.

what winning team would be willing to mess up thier roster for tyson? thats what they will have to do to match up his 14 mil salary. very few good teams have dead salary on thier roster.
i have said this before and will say it again, melo for blake is a pipe dream, blake is a Need for them, melo is a nice to have.
the headcase, ball hog jr smith, shooting 35% with 2 years left after this, and a trade kicker to boot.
felton sucks, feltons contracts sucks more.
shump trade for another rebuild project is likely.

not saying that chandler, jr smith, felton are untradeable. instead saying not to expect much. more along the lines of one garbage for another.
Mars_Blackmon
Banned User
Posts: 6,098
And1: 2,263
Joined: Apr 17, 2013

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3797 » by Mars_Blackmon » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:25 am

navyblue wrote:
Mars_Blackmon wrote:Trade Tyson to a team trying to win now, get back a young guy and a pick
Trade Melo to LAC for Blake, flip Blake for picks/youth
Trade JR to a team in need of scoring
Trade Felton to a team needing a back up PG get back a 2nd rounder
Flip Shumpert for a young guy struggling who needs a change of scenery(Shump for Kidd-Gilchrist maybe)

Let everyone else expire

I'm gonna put something together now

everything except the shump trade is unlikely.

what winning team would be willing to mess up thier roster for tyson? thats what they will have to do to match up his 14 mil salary. very few good teams have dead salary on thier roster.
i have said this before and will say it again, melo for blake is a pipe dream, blake is a Need for them, melo is a nice to have.
the headcase, ball hog jr smith, shooting 35% with 2 years left after this, and a trade kicker to boot.
felton sucks, feltons contracts sucks more.
shump trade for another rebuild project is likely.

not saying that chandler, jr smith, felton are untradeable. instead saying not to expect much. more along the lines of one garbage for another.


You would trade Tyson to a team who needs a Center if they are trying to win now
Felton would be a good back up, think GSW
Blake is good but Melo makes more sense for LAC, last nights game down the stretch is was all Paul and they lost because Blake is too limited offensively
JR has a bad rep around here but a strong head coach will keep him in check and make sure he plays better
Shumpert needs a change of scenery bad
jdm_dc_fan
Senior
Posts: 639
And1: 402
Joined: Sep 08, 2012

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3798 » by jdm_dc_fan » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:49 am

NYKfan77 wrote:Call up Portland and offer them Tyson for Robin Lopez, Thomas Robinson and CJ McCollum....

Do you think Portland says yes?

Throw in hardaway and they would entertain it for sure. CJ can be a better player than tim.
User avatar
Rasho Brezec
RealGM
Posts: 61,962
And1: 18,589
Joined: Mar 12, 2008
Contact:
   

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3799 » by Rasho Brezec » Sat Dec 28, 2013 1:22 pm

Tyson to OKC for Perkins and Adams is the only trade that makes sense.
Image
NOOB77
General Manager
Posts: 9,165
And1: 3,288
Joined: Aug 17, 2007
   

Re: Knicks-Related Trade "THOUGHTS" Thread 

Post#3800 » by NOOB77 » Sat Dec 28, 2013 5:21 pm

STAT for Bynum. How much did they sign him for??

Return to New York Knicks