TrueWarrior wrote:god shammgod wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:Sham cant even say "Melo is on the Knicks now and Gallo isnt thats why" [/b]because all last year this dude was jabbing at Gallo and pitchin tents at the thought of Melo.
Everyone has biases and favorites. Who cares. Just admit it.
i was about to say that dammit. guess what though, i don't hate gallo. i'd take him back now. i hate the obsession with him here though. people are acting like this validates him tonight. i guess they're gonna make him an all-star now. oh wait, they're not. he's a good player but not a great one and never will be. that's all.
I kind of agree with that. Gallo will likely top out as a 20/6/4 type of player if he reaches his potential. A borderline All Star who is a very good all around player. He'll never be as talented a scorer as Melo but the question will be who will end up being the better team player, and thus the better winner. No doubt Gallo is the better ball mover, is more efficient, and gives more effort on D. Melo is just going to have to step it up no matter what to prove he was worth what we gave up for him.
Efficiency is pretty huge and often is what separates players because it has a doubling effect on the outcome of the game.
The efficient player gets theirs while allowing for others to contribute and that is a net/net result or a double positive.
An efficient player who is the focal point gets less results relative to their overall effort while taking away from the opportunity of the rest of the players to contribute and that is a double negative.
When the supporting players are not really good, the second scenario often kicks in as it has here, but that does not explain away the primary player's own inefficiency.