Or better yet, go ask Toronto fans what they think of the following statements regarding Calderon & Rubio:
knicksnyk wrote:jose is the better ball handler

knicksnyk wrote:better passer

knicksnyk wrote:less turnover prone
Sorry, but here it gets pretty clear that you're just not looking at the whole situation logically.
The reason why Calderon has less turnovers is because he rarely even tries doing any serious passes, most of his passes are safe simple ones that rarely even create anything for his teammate. A whole bunch of his assists come after he pounds the ball for a big portion of the possession (because he doesn't have the creativity and/or vision to put his teammates in nice spots, so he needs to wait and wait and wait for a chance to do one of his safe simple ones), then passes to one of his teams' scorers, who then shoots over the defender (and since very often there are only a couple seconds left, the guy just has to shoot), and/or makes a few individual moves to get open, after which Calderon only gets credited for an assist because of very loose NBA assist-awarding rules.
Rubio, on the other hand, is much more talented, a MUCH better passer, with a MUCH better vision, so he makes quick decisions, with plenty of time left on the clock. Also, unlike Calderon, he often makes tough passes right under the basket, which lead to either easy points or a foul (no assist credited). On the other hand, Calderon's passes rarely lead to fouls as his teammate mostly needs to pull up for a long jump-shot.
All-in-all, Calderon is basically the perfect example of an "empty stats" PG (but don't get me wrong, he's still a very solid PG who would make a great backup on a contender, or at least pretender), while Rubio's numbers have a lot more substance to them.