KnixinSix wrote:aggo wrote:Chanel Bomber wrote:That's ridiculous.
Dame will be 31 in two weeks. He hasn't played a single Finals game, or won a single game in the Conference Finals.
This is the sort of trade that just spells doom for a franchise.
For a 27 year-old Dame? Why not. For a 31 year-old Dame, it's malpractice. Imo.
I would trade for Lillard in a heartbeat but that's too much.
The entire purpose of trading for Lillard is so that we can pair him with RJ and Randle. RJ can always be traded later for another player but not for Lillard as we truly wouldn't have any assets remaining and would be street begging UFAs to sign with the team.
Obi + 4FRPs + 3 FRP swaps is what I'd offer. It's comparable to the James Harden trade.
They also gave up Jarrett Allen and Prince. I would keep Quickley but give up RJ,Obi,Knox , 3-4FRPs
yeah they did that to help balance contracts though. we dont need to do that, plus I think we all can agree that Harden >> Lillard
Obi +4frps + 3 swaps is a fair offer in absolute terms. If we would require IQ thrown in, is that really a deal breaker for instance? no....
























