ImageImageImageImageImage

2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas

Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks

nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#381 » by nykballa2k4 » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:25 am

8516knicks wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:
HopelessKnick wrote:If there was any chance to get OG at a reasonable or even expensive price he'd already be a knick. He is probably the best wing defender in the NBA and could potentially average 20 points on good %. He will cost a kings ransom. I actually doubt Mitchell costing much more than Anunoby.


I think as we get closer to February, the price will go down. Ultimately, he will determine where he is traded because no one is trading much for him as a UFA. In an ironic twist, he would likely be traded in a way similar to Kawii dealt to TOR. Probably a reasonable deal would be IQ, Grimes, NY '24 (or DAL'24), and two of the cashe (MIL'25, either WAS or DET). Fournier's contract of course attached.

Mitch/iHart
RAndle
OG/Hart
RJ/DD
Brunson/Deuce

OG would obviously be a max contract. 44M for him :oops:

IQ will be demanding 25 and Grimes a year later will be in the 20 range (greater if he makes a leap) so it's not as expensive as it looks, but he'd be the face of the team....


Think I'd rather have Markkanen - we need shooters, especially also a tall one to space things for Randle.[/quote]

You have to consider the price, you know Utah isn't giving him away....
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,522
And1: 6,427
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#382 » by 8516knicks » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:35 am

nykballa2k4 wrote:
8516knicks wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:


I think as we get closer to February, the price will go down. Ultimately, he will determine where he is traded because no one is trading much for him as a UFA. In an ironic twist, he would likely be traded in a way similar to Kawii dealt to TOR. Probably a reasonable deal would be IQ, Grimes, NY '24 (or DAL'24), and two of the cashe (MIL'25, either WAS or DET). Fournier's contract of course attached.

Mitch/iHart
RAndle
OG/Hart
RJ/DD
Brunson/Deuce

OG would obviously be a max contract. 44M for him :oops:

IQ will be demanding 25 and Grimes a year later will be in the 20 range (greater if he makes a leap) so it's not as expensive as it looks, but he'd be the face of the team....


Think I'd rather have Markkanen - we need shooters, especially also a tall one to space things for Randle.


You have to consider the price, you know Utah isn't giving him away....[/quote]

I'm willing to spend as much of Dolan's money as I am able to! :lol:
nykballa2k4
RealGM
Posts: 31,081
And1: 7,451
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Location: Kurt Rhombus is managing the defense...
       

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#383 » by nykballa2k4 » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:40 am

WargamesX wrote:
8516knicks wrote:
nykballa2k4 wrote:


I think as we get closer to February, the price will go down. Ultimately, he will determine where he is traded because no one is trading much for him as a UFA. In an ironic twist, he would likely be traded in a way similar to Kawii dealt to TOR. Probably a reasonable deal would be IQ, Grimes, NY '24 (or DAL'24), and two of the cashe (MIL'25, either WAS or DET). Fournier's contract of course attached.

Mitch/iHart
RAndle
OG/Hart
RJ/DD
Brunson/Deuce

OG would obviously be a max contract. 44M for him :oops:

IQ will be demanding 25 and Grimes a year later will be in the 20 range (greater if he makes a leap) so it's not as expensive as it looks, but he'd be the face of the team....[/quotes]

Think I'd rather have Markkanen - we need shooters, especially also a tall one to space things for Randle.


I don't think Grimes asks for 20 and on the low they can let Fournier expire and will have the money they need for IQ even if he wants 25. The only reason to do a trade is if it doesn't cut into the good players they have, which is why I think OG is a pipe dream. The knicks should be shopping Founier and picks only.


Thibs wants a 9 man rotation

C/C
PF
SF/Util
SG/Util
PG/PG

If we shop Fournier+picks, that means he'd have to play 10 guys (unlikely) or someone will have to go into the abyss (it won't be a Villanovian).

Grimes is currently a starting 3-D wing, his comp is Mikal Bridges plus inflation. SOMEONE will pay 20M for him (assuming he shoots >35% from 3 and plays his usual defense).

If they each play well, Grimes+IQ could easily cost over 50M in two years. We will get to that when we get to that, but I think it's important to think pipeline, and condensing talent.
Numbers don't lie, people who use them do
Stand up to all hate
Stand up to Jewish hate
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,498
And1: 8,474
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#384 » by Skybox » Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:41 pm

Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,764
And1: 95,592
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#385 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:03 pm

Skybox wrote:Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.


Sorry on the 2nd trade. I can't see the Knicks gifting your team Hartenstein when he's the Knicks only viable backup big.
Image
Skybox
RealGM
Posts: 18,498
And1: 8,474
Joined: Jan 21, 2017
 

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#386 » by Skybox » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:19 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Skybox wrote:Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.


Sorry on the 2nd trade. I can't see the Knicks gifting your team Hartenstein when he's the Knicks only viable backup big.


He's certainly not the deal breaker for me. I just figured he's the salary match and he's expiring...mostly, he's unnecessary as WCJ picks up mins at C with Robinson.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,764
And1: 95,592
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#387 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Nov 11, 2023 2:28 pm

Skybox wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Skybox wrote:Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.


Sorry on the 2nd trade. I can't see the Knicks gifting your team Hartenstein when he's the Knicks only viable backup big.


He's certainly not the deal breaker for me. I just figured he's the salary match and he's expiring...mostly, he's unnecessary as WCJ picks up mins at C with Robinson.


WCJ isn't bad. Thibs probably values iShart more though.
Image
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,563
And1: 1,679
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#388 » by JayTWill » Sat Nov 11, 2023 6:23 pm

I previously posted this on the Wizards board
JayTWill wrote:I recently proposed a deal on the Trade board and i'm interested in getting other Wizards fans' opinions. The original proposal was -

Knicks out - Quickley, Fournier, Roby
Knicks in - Avdija, Gallinari, Young, Flynn, 2026 Raptors Second Round Pick

Wizards out - Avdija, Wright, Shamet, Gallinari
Wizards in - Quickley, Fournier, Porter, Roby

Raptors out - Porter, Young, Flynn, 2026 Second Round Pick
Raptors in - Wright, Shamet

Seeing as the Knicks currently have a lawsuit filed against the Raptors and obvious friction I revised the deal to be
Quickley, Fournier, and Roby for Avdija, Gallinari and Shamet

This deal would leave the Wizards thin at the forward spots but maybe the Wizards could make a deal directly with the Raptors offering Wright for one of their many forwards. Most Wizards fans seemed to prefer the potential of Deni over IQ while Knicks fans felt IQ was currently too good of a player to trade and gamble on the upside of a Deni. Thoughts?


Their board's response was once again that they preferred Deni to IQ and that they felt confident with the trades for Poole and Jones filling their backcourt needs for now. Since that post the Jones/Poole backcourt has looked like a disaster in the small sample size but Deni reworked his jumpshot over the summer and his efficiency and confidence have seemed to improve across the board although it is on limited volume. Kuzma is playing well so far and the Wizards just drafted Coulibaly. The top of next year's draft is full of more forwards. Maybe they would be willing to move Deni to improve their backcourt. I would be willing to swap Sims for Roby who has been cut. Sims is behind 2 much more experienced and polished centers and is surprisingly the same age as them. I don't know if he will ever be a rotational level player in this league but the Wizards lack center depth and could take a flyer on him.

As far as the rest of the trade I love what IQ brings to the team outside of his limited point guard skills but the organization seems fully committed to Brunson as the starting point guard and they are content with Grimes in his starting role. IQ will not have the opportunity to fully blossom in his current role and the Knicks have other needs that they should invest in financially. Deni could fill the role as a back up power forward/bigger wing defender while also providing the ability to facilitate while hopefully maintaining his shooting efficiency. I would love to see a lineup of DD/Grimes/Hart/Avdija/IHart. That lineup would provide great defense, energy and ball movement offering the opportunity for Grimes and Donte to get more touches and hopefully be more consistent shooting.

Mostly I just want to swap out one of the many guards for more length. The team's lack of size affects the game in many ways. Defensively watching Grimes trying to defend the Tatum, Ingram or even guys like Middleton and you can just see he is physically over-matched. Randle being on the only power forward and even with his lackadaisical effort being seen as the best defensive matchup against guys like Zion and Giannis is depressing. Seeing Josh Hart close out to a stretch 4/5 like Naz Reid in the preseason was almost comical. Deni would provide more size and defensive versatility. He is like a bigger version of Grimes. Doesn't have great measurements or athleticism but is very fundamentally sound.

And quietly I think the lack of size hurts the offense and specifically Brunson. The roster makeup forces the Knicks to play small much of the time and allows teams to hide their small poor defending guards. Brunson has to deal with longer defenders for much of the game because he is always on the floor with 1,2 or 3 of Grimes/IQ/Hart/DD where teams can hide the Lillards and Trae Youngs while Brunson dominates the ball trying to score against tougher defenders. Providing one more player with size makes it much more difficult to hide small poor defenders. You can't hide Trae Young versus Brunson, Barrett, Deni, Randle, Robinson. Deni is not a dominant scorer but he is skilled enough to take advantage of Young on the interior and would destroy him on the boards. I just feel like Deni would give the team the opportunity to play big or small and he just signed a very reasonable declining contract. Shamet and Gallinari would also provide more depth and shooting when necessary.
User avatar
SelbyCobra
RealGM
Posts: 10,462
And1: 20,552
Joined: May 25, 2011

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#389 » by SelbyCobra » Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:22 pm

Preferring Avdija to Quickley at this point in time is just ignorance and/or outright stupidity. I get that he does some things well (defense) and that he has value, but he's shown nowhere near the offensive ability that IQ has, despite Quickley also having defense as his calling card.

If I'm the Knicks I have no problem holding/re-signing Quick if the centerpiece of a trade return is a Deni Avdija type.
Image
User avatar
NoDopeOnSundays
RealGM
Posts: 27,168
And1: 56,340
Joined: Nov 22, 2005
         

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#390 » by NoDopeOnSundays » Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:12 pm

Read on Twitter



Potential downfall? They've already fallen.
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,424
And1: 62,548
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#391 » by HarthorneWingo » Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:47 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Skybox wrote:Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.


Sorry on the 2nd trade. I can't see the Knicks gifting your team Hartenstein when he's the Knicks only viable backup big.

But we'd be getting Wendell Carter, Jr. who could back up both Mitch and Randle, though I really like the way iHart is playing this season. I still don't know who this "star" we're supposed to be getting is. I would really like a solid backup player at the 3/4 positions. iHart can play some PF if need be depending on what the match-ups are.
Free Palestine
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,764
And1: 95,592
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#392 » by thebuzzardman » Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:08 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Skybox wrote:Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.


Sorry on the 2nd trade. I can't see the Knicks gifting your team Hartenstein when he's the Knicks only viable backup big.

But we'd be getting Wendell Carter, Jr. who could back up both Mitch and Randle, though I really like the way iHart is playing this season. I still don't know who this "star" we're supposed to be getting is. I would really like a solid backup player at the 3/4 positions. iHart can play some PF if need be depending on what the match-ups are.


I think the Knicks should back off the "star" idea and just incrementally improve the team.
If the players acquired in the incremental trades are good and on reasonable contracts, they can be traded along with anyone else on the roster in the eventual big trade.
Image
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,563
And1: 1,679
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#393 » by JayTWill » Sat Nov 11, 2023 10:48 pm

SelbyCobra wrote:Preferring Avdija to Quickley at this point in time is just ignorance and/or outright stupidity. I get that he does some things well (defense) and that he has value, but he's shown nowhere near the offensive ability that IQ has, despite Quickley also having defense as his calling card.

If I'm the Knicks I have no problem holding/re-signing Quick if the centerpiece of a trade return is a Deni Avdija type.


IQ is a superior scorer to Deni but IQ does have holes in his offensive game. IQ generates more assists than Deni because of how much he handles the ball but Deni is much more of a natural facilitator. The team has multiple scorers in Brunson, Randle, Barrett and Quickley. They have ball movers in Grimes, Hart, and DD. The only player on the team that as first option looks to directly facilitate offense for others is Hartenstein. The offense may actually benefit overall with an added facilitator. The ball movement has improved some recently but the top 4 options in the offense all look to score first when they have the ball in their hands. It's an overkill for that type of player. And for all of the talent IQ has as a scorer none of that has translated to the playoffs yet. He receives a very favorable whistle during the regular season that covers up some of his ball pounding and shot hunting. When he is not getting those calls in the playoffs combined with natural inconsistency that comes with 3 point shooting for most players he can struggle.

To IQ's credit he can affect the game positively in other ways but his size limits his and the teams versatility. He is a great rebounder, he plays with great energy, his team defense is incredible and he is man defense is good but obviously bigger players will give him trouble. Deni does all those things also while being 6'9 and filling multiple holes in the team and being locked into a contract that declines from $15 million per to $12 million from ages 23 to 26. Seems like a much better investment than spending $25 million to retain another small guard and another ball dominant player. SIZE MATTERS. If the team had more natural distributors for IQ to play off of more often it would make sense but having 4 guys to take turns scoring the ball seems like a luxury and not a necessity. There are other ways to improve the offense. The complimentary players would benefit from more ball movement, more touches and staying in a better rhythm.

The only reason I would look to retain IQ is because of my concerns with Brunson on his next contract. Maxing out a small ball dominant scorer into his 30's that does not defend or distribute well scares me. The organization seems to be fully committed to the Brunson/Nova world so I have no idea if they could turn back now. If Brunson loses a step for any reason his offense could suffer mightily and that contract could look terrible but then I see the contracts great defensive wings with limited offense are receiving and Deni's contract is worth risk in this trade to me. He is not on the level of someone like OG defensively but OG would cost a lot in assets to acquire and then you probably have to pay him 40-44 million a year to retain him even though he struggles to create, dribble and pass.
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,720
And1: 19,238
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#394 » by KnicksGadfly » Sun Nov 12, 2023 2:26 am

NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Read on Twitter



Potential downfall? They've already fallen.


Their downfall began when they decided Vuc and DeRozan were the missing pieces to their team...this is some Isiah Thomas shyt lol
Ray Williams
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 2,598
Joined: Aug 13, 2001

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#395 » by Ray Williams » Sun Nov 12, 2023 2:37 am

Randle
Quickley
All our protected 1st rounders
Pick swaps for the next 3 years
For Zion

Mitch- Hartenstein
Zion-Sims
RJ- Hart
Brunson- Deuce
Grimes- Donte

NO seems like they’d rather build around Ingram than Zion. RJ will be a good influence on Zion and will bring out the best in him. We need to do what we can while NO is struggling and take advantage of the situation.
Sims would be our 10th man, he and Hartenstein have played well together so he can backup PF when needed, and we free Deuce, he is being wasted now.
User avatar
Ma10
Pro Prospect
Posts: 949
And1: 817
Joined: Feb 11, 2021
Location: Lübeck
 

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#396 » by Ma10 » Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:17 am

Skybox wrote:Let’s say ORL makes it clear that they’re coming hard for IQ in FA, ready to pay $25+ x 4. Is there a point where NY recognizes it’s too much to match for a backup to Brunson? Is there a realistic preemptive deal to be made now- with the understanding that NY is likely to lose him and watch him blow up running his own show (just like Brunson). Meaning…IQ is worth more in ORL than in his likely ceiling in NY.

ORL has expiring salaries to send out if NYK are hunting bigger game this summer. NY doesn’t really have any large bad money as Fournier is TO. Do you still hate RJ? I know NY fans are conflicted, but id love to take him too.

ORL sends: Fultz $17m expiring, DEN 25 frp
NYK sends: Fournier, IQ

Or…
NYK sends: Immanuel Quickley, Fournier, Hartenstein
ORL sends: WCJ, Gary Harris, Cole Anthony, DEN 25 frp
* I didn't think ORL had to add picks until I saw that Evan's deal is a TO-not bad money next season, so add DEN 1st

For NY: Robinson/Randle/WCJ is a very solid versatile youngish big rotation (much improved). WCJ might be the most underrated, versatile big in the NBA, on a great deal. He can impact as a starter or reserve at 4/5 and fortify NY’s playoff depth in a variety of ways. Cole just signed a team-friendly deal and could likely pickup much of what IQ provided at half the price (maybe more offensively & rebounding, without the great D). Cole’s a NYC kid and has zero yips in the bright lights…he could become a major player.

Some NYK fans consider Barrett a bad/negative value contract - I'd be very happy to work him into the deal with IQ, he's playing really well so far, so I don't think that's NY’s angle. But, if NYK had a bigger target in FA, they would want the added cap space of unloading Barrett (IDK who that is - Embiid is winning, Giannis re-upped).

NYK sends: IQ, Barrett
ORL sends: Fultz, Gary Harris, Cole, ORL 24 frp (top 5), DEN 25 frp
NY gets lots of expiring salary for Barrett (not to mention that IQ would’ve forced a $25m match vs Cole’s $13), plus two picks. Again, statistically, Barrett looks great…I dont know how the FO feels about him. Note that G. Harris, while expiring, is no slouch…he’s a very solid 3&D SG, who hangs around 40% from 3 and rarely makes a mistake on either end…so this wouldn’t mean NYK is conceding this season in order to make a bigger ring-chasing splash in the summer.

* remember, these are all based on the idea that NY will be placed in a tight spot with IQ’s upcoming FA and will have to make a tough decision. It doesn’t make a lot of sense to pay IQ $25+ when you’ve got Brunson, for risk of stagnating like POR tying so much up with Dame & CJ. The FO has to consider team composition over individual players’ value.


That's a lot of effort for such a shytty trade idea!
Image
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#397 » by HopelessKnick » Sun Nov 12, 2023 9:47 am

I would consider trading IQ but it would have to be for a very good return. IQ has his weaknesses but he can easily be a perennial 6th man candidate and good starter in spurts as well. He plays both ends of the court and is a great FT shooter. He will also get better. We trade him and after that we'll be looking for someone to come in with the ability to drop 18points and plays both ends. We drafted him, he has improved a lot---I'd definitely keep him around if there isn't a trade for a good 3/4. None of the other guards like DD, Grimes, McBride can even remotely reproduce what IQ is giving us. I feel like some are way underappreciating IQ. I'm very happy to have him here.

If there was a way to snag a young 2-way 3 and D guy that can get you 15+points then you make IQ and a pick available---but not for some rotational players from somewhere.
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#398 » by HopelessKnick » Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:06 am

I think we should kiss the ideas of acquiring Anunoby or Bridges etc. goodbye. Neither of those players is going to end up in a knick uniform.

We should look at the next tier of 3-D wings.....one player I like is PJ Washginton.....he has the size and strength to guard both the 4 and the 3, he can shoot the 3 solidly and he is still young and not injury prone. He has shown the ability to drop 15 + points as well and Charlotte is a team that could be willing to trade with us. Although Washington is more of a 4/5 than 3/4.

Keldon Johnson is another possibility although he is kinda smallish at 6''5 and his 3 point shooting I don't trust as much. But he could also be a good option.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,149
And1: 3,819
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#399 » by KnixinSix » Sun Nov 12, 2023 10:56 am

KnicksGadfly wrote:
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Read on Twitter



Potential downfall? They've already fallen.


Their downfall began when they decided Vuc and DeRozan were the missing pieces to their team...this is some Isiah Thomas shyt lol


The interesting thing if you trade for LaVine is that you could also then flip him for Donovan Mitchell if you wanted.

Either a 3 way deal or if Cleveland is still 'going for it' with Mitchell then you wait the 2 month moratorium and then see if they want to deal by trade deadline or the offseason.

You have Donte Divincenzo now who makes Quickley and Grimes more 'expendable'. Obviously Quickley is the best of the 3 but DD gives you a little of both Grimes and Quick. He has the enough height for a half decent sized shooting guard, he can play point capably in spurts and he is a plus type defender like Quick/Grimes.

So in a deal for another guard , at minumum Quckley or Grimes get traded. Possibly both.
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
HopelessKnick
Analyst
Posts: 3,293
And1: 3,002
Joined: Aug 03, 2021

Re: 2023-24 NY Knicks trade ideas 

Post#400 » by HopelessKnick » Sun Nov 12, 2023 12:43 pm

LaVine stated openly that he doesn't want to join the Knicks. I have no idea why people want him here. A Brunson/LaVine backcourt will be giving up almost every single point that they score on the other end....

Return to New York Knicks