KnixinSix wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:KnixinSix wrote:
It may impact the full package of what we would give up overall.But two years for a player that could be key as a final piece to a championship run is worth it
We're better off just keeping Mitch if the other option is to trade multiple picks for a backup. At the end of the day, he would be KAT's backup.
Kessler nor Poeltl make any sense for this team, trading for a starting center to be a backup when there's an all-star MVP caliber center already on the team, with 3 backups makes no sense.
We will agree to disagree then.
The only decision this FO has to make is whether or not they believe Mitch can stay healthy or not.
If he can, he's the # 1 offensive rebounder in the league and a menace in the paint on defense. You do not need to nor should you want to replace healthy Mitch.
If the FO believes Mitch can get healthy, you keep him. If not, you trade him.































