cgmw wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:cgmw wrote:Team "No" here
1) Generally in life it's better to set low expectations so you're pleasantly surprised if/when things go better; and:
2) Difference maker from/to what exactly? The Leon Rose years are a gigantic waste of time and have virtually zero path to Division Champ, let alone Conference or World Champ. Even if Brunson has a good individual year, the best we can hope for is that somehow Leon trades for a Donovan-Mitchell, Carmelo-Anthony, Stephon-Marbury level borderline top-20 player who also won't be able to be a "difference maker" because the franchise is being run as a generational joke with 0 hope or chance. Pinning "difference maker" on Brunson is unfair, unrealistic, and just begging for outrage/disappointment later.
Ah yes, the championship or completely suck argument. Oh well, 28 teams wasting their time in the NBA right now.
The OKC Thunder have no chance of a championship in 2023. But they sure look like decent favorites for championship contention in the next decade. The same can be said for about half the teams in the league, who at least HAVE A POTENTIAL PATH to contention.
The Knicks have 0% chance of a championship this year, next year, the year after that, and every year during at least the next decade. That's a very different scenario than the "other 28 teams" who pretty much all at least attempt to value taking shots at the top of the draft.
The difference is ownership, who insisted on hiring a player agent as POBO with the explicit strategy of trading for or signing CAA cronies in FA. Newsflash: That ain't happening. Leon Rose has 0 way of making the Knicks into contenders.
I'm saying Jalen Brunson isn't a difference maker because he's simply not good enough to overcome the unbelievably stupid and rotting dysfunction of MSG.
Yeah, not saying most of what you say isn't true, but it took the topic of "if Brunson makes a difference on the court" and spins into the larger point of "what's the use", which wasn't exactly the question.
It's a larger version of the reply "Well, Brunson doesn't catapult the Knicks into deep playoff or championship contention, so no"
I think he makes the team better and the current produce more watchable and it's pretty hard to deny that, Legler's Knicks for clicks BS notwithstanding.
Are the Knicks going anywhere except maybe a bottom seed playoff team as a result - no.
I'd still have added Brunson - if there's ANY chance for the Knicks to do anything and build off whatever they've done, then they had to address the position in some way and I think Brunson, at his price (ignoring having to clear FA mistakes etc out of the equation) is a worthy player.
I don't believe this FO or any FO under Dolan has the ability to take the next steps towards proper contention/legitimacy, but that's another argument.