I like Zach because
Moderators: Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85, Capn'O, dakomish23, j4remi, Deeeez Knicks, NoLayupRule, mpharris36, GONYK
-
- Junior
- Posts: 326
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 15, 2007
I like both players but I don't think you can keep both. I think Zach might be more talented but I think I would keep Curry because of his size. I don't think guys like Curry come around very often. However, both of these guys need to play with a 4 or 5 who defends, blocks shots and rebounds. My preference is to keep Curry. I think Zach has better all around skills but the combination of Curry's size and talent are too much to give away. I know about all of Curry's weaknesses.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,852
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 09, 2005
- randomhero423
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,013
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 09, 2006
- Location: Brooklyn, New York
- Contact:
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,852
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 09, 2005
fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Care to explain how I am wrong?
king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
No not really
fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
That's because you can't, take a look at his turnovers. How many does he have thus far tonight?
king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
What that gotta do with Turn Overs ?
???
You said his lateral quickness and help D are better. I said you are wrong, you said you can't look at his turnovers. I said what does turnovers have to do with Help D and Lateral Quickness
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 9,277
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 30, 2004
king_k4life wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
???
You said his lateral quickness and help D are better. I said you are wrong, you said you can't look at his turnovers. I said what does turnovers have to do with Help D and Lateral Quickness
Since when are the two mutually exclusive? I brought in that fact from watching his poor play today. Another reason why Lee is better then Randolph outside of Randolph's atrocious defensive play. Something you have failed to prove at how it is better then Lee.
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 12,852
- And1: 2
- Joined: Jul 09, 2005
fimslim3 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-
Since when are the two mutually exclusive? I brought in that fact from watching his poor play today. Another reason why Lee is better then Randolph outside of Randolph's atrocious defensive play. Something you have failed to prove at how it is better then Lee.
Yo
You said That his Help D Sucks more than Lee
I said False
You said Look at his turnovers ?
F_ck that gotta do with his help D
- randomhero423
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,013
- And1: 1
- Joined: Jul 09, 2006
- Location: Brooklyn, New York
- Contact:
-
- Banned User
- Posts: 9,277
- And1: 1
- Joined: Nov 30, 2004
king_k4life wrote:Yo
You said That his Help D Sucks more than Lee
I said False
You said Look at his turnovers ?
F_ck that gotta do with his help D
Do you know what commas and sentences do? They separate two separate thoughts, I randomly brought in a separate thought to talk about how Lee is better then Randolph outside their individual play on the defensive end, do you follow?
- HKSVIP
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,368
- And1: 107
- Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Are you guys serious? If we had last year's team with Randolph instead of Curry I bet we would be much better than only 33 wins. Curry doesn't play defense either. I think Frye was our best down low defender. If he was here alongside Zach we would be a better team. The only things Curry can do better than Zach is dunk and eat.