Milk wrote:
The eye test backs it up too. Great positioning, moving his feet really well, using his strength, etc
Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi
Milk wrote:
RHODEY wrote:NYK Dolemite wrote:RHODEY wrote:
Well you make you own luck. They seemed to want it more. We are considerably more talented though. It was a road win versus a tough team. Ill take it. Ill say one thing..we are just skimming our full potential...
Rhodey, I agree with all this. But what do you think is going on? I mean this team preaches about loving the Thibs style, but they play West 4th street ball down the stretch all the time with boneheaded long passes and shots early in the shot, clock. It’s like they are failing at the easiest part of the game, having situational awareness and being energetic.
Just seems like weird symptoms for a Thibs team.
a) 40% of your starting lineup is new - time should help this.
.
Richard4444 wrote:RHODEY wrote:NYK Dolemite wrote:
Rhodey, I agree with all this. But what do you think is going on? I mean this team preaches about loving the Thibs style, but they play West 4th street ball down the stretch all the time with boneheaded long passes and shots early in the shot, clock. It’s like they are failing at the easiest part of the game, having situational awareness and being energetic.
Just seems like weird symptoms for a Thibs team.
a) 40% of your starting lineup is new - time should help this.
.
I would say 60% because Mitch barely played last season.
DaGawd wrote:KnicksGod wrote:RJ should be converting most of you by now. He's a grinder who shows up. The other guy is a fumbler who disappears.
Cut it out. There have been plenty of games I forget RJ is even on the floor.. no one on this team is perfect
RHODEY wrote:NYK Dolemite wrote:RHODEY wrote:
Well you make you own luck. They seemed to want it more. We are considerably more talented though. It was a road win versus a tough team. Ill take it. Ill say one thing..we are just skimming our full potential...
If he was a little more self aware and had a tad less ego he would know when to defer. He's not fully there yet. Forget about squandering the lead. When we had a decent lead - I think we were up by 12pts or something- Chicago missed a shot Julius go the rebound and decides to make this kinda difficult pass cross court to RJ . He botched the pass and overthrows RJ.
Its plays like that where I see the ego and lack of knowing his limitations, knowing the flow of the game. Hes a good passer but dude you aint cp3 or Magic Johnson. That pass was totally unnecessary, we had numbers either way and would have easily gone up by 14 or 15 if he'd had just been smarter or should I say "cooler". He's excitable sometimes.... .
There was a wall of bodies behind him.F N 11 wrote:Lonzo held his own in the post against Randle. That was weird. Was Julius tired?
BingoblueNorange wrote:KnixinSix wrote:omerome wrote:Dame is going to suck the life out of the team because POR is going to want everything in return.
I'd love to have him, but he's too rich for us to get.
Not too rich. The remaining roster will still be deep and strong and a whole lot better with him than without.
no it won't, no stop bringing your dumb ideas into this thread.
you have your own thread for this garbage.
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
It's a good scheme against a post up. Send the double from the baseline on the dribble leaving the corner shooter open. Now Julius can't hit the open man immediately. There should be some action to get that corner out there into Julius' line of sight.Gravy wrote:It was like deja vu how the Bulls actually copied the Hawks defense against Randle in the playoffs. It had a similar effect on him too but this time he had more help and we had a 10 point lead most of the game. It's good that the team saw that defense again so early in the season so they have an idea what to expect
F N 11 wrote:
Johnnie Bryant got in the lab with RJ on finishes for sure. I did not see them slow dragging feet layups. He just straight took it!
Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
prophet_of_rage wrote:It's a good scheme against a post up. Send the double from the baseline on the dribble leaving the corner shooter open. Now Julius can't hit the open man immediately. There should be some action to get that corner out there into Julius' line of sight.Gravy wrote:It was like deja vu how the Bulls actually copied the Hawks defense against Randle in the playoffs. It had a similar effect on him too but this time he had more help and we had a 10 point lead most of the game. It's good that the team saw that defense again so early in the season so they have an idea what to expect
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
robillionaire wrote:Angryfatboy wrote:Kemba is currently shooting 52% from 3
W
T
F
that was before this game and he was 5-6 tonight. He's 58% now
thebuzzardman wrote:DaGawd wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Where is the path to upgrade the Knicks?
Which position should it happen at or which player?
Let's assume the Knicks are a middle of the pack playoff team right now. Might be a little generous, but just go with that.
Which position/piece/player takes them to the next level.
For instance, I'm a fan of SGA. Find myself hoping that OKC decides to move on from his money after all. Probably not. But other than age, his he THAT much of an upgrade over Rose/Kemba? I mean, next level upgrade?
I know the Knicks have to solve PG long term
RJ is the homegrown draft pick, but he's not a star, not now, maybe never.
Fournier is good, but not dominant.
Mitch is very good defensively but a role player offensively.
There's even an argument for moving Randle for the right guys.
SGA? KAT? Booker? Ignoring that these players are under contract.
I'll pass on Beal.
Dame is a great player but he's 31, gets paid a ton, will cost even more.
I'm going to assume the upgrade happens at the wing and sends Fournier or RJ to 6th man status.
SGA would have to force his way here because there would be plenty of suitors.. but he’s definitely someone I’m willing to trade almost anything for
Me too. But, does he make the Knicks championship contenders?