Gravy wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:KAT getting exposed by all the top contenders is extremely worrisome. He looks like one of the best big men in the league against bad teams and then looks very mid against contenders. Mikal does the same thing too. Very sad we went all in on fake stars.
I've never seen this many excuses and deflection for a star having bad games. Randle would put up 25/10/5 in a win and folks would be furious over one bad defensive play.

KAT went 3-13 so Thibs is making him miss open shots and get stripped under the rim and throw passes out of bounds and not put his hands up on defense
KAT definitely has to be better. I haven't done any analysis but off the top of my head, I feel like the amount of shots he takes against good teams is low. That kills us because he is extremely efficient...he needs his shots, and he adds value through offense, not defense. He's not Mitch. Mitch can take 0 shots a game and it's very plausible that he's done a lot to help the team win.
I don't know why Randle gets brought up as someone who is good against good teams. Man hasn't even shown up in a playoffs series ever, whether on the court or in previous years, even being available. We had to move on. There wasn't any way we could build a winning team with him. Even that imaginary scenario

it's more likely Randle would have had meltdowns, turnovers and bad defense.
Just because there are dudes defending KAT, doesn't mean that Randle didn't deserve criticism. Actually, I'd even argue guys gave him way too much leeway here. Dudes were frothing at the teeth to extend him last year. New York is a lot nicer to their players than people give credit for. My entire point: there's no sense of injustice anyone should be feeling on Randle's behalf.
Maybe that's a discussion that needs to be had in the Cap thread.