[Build A Team 4.0] Discussion Thread

ctorres · Post #421 » by **ctorres** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 3:39 pm

Jstarks3 wrote:
swisscheeseD wrote:#25 up for grabs...heading out on a few appointments, be back to pull the trigger on a solid offer or to make my selection.

Forward all offers to ChrisJSmith36@gmail.com

Be back in a few hours!

wait, didnt you trade your 25th to dallas?

Dude, swiss is Dallas, I'm Houston!

LJ4pointplay · Post #422 » by **LJ4pointplay** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 3:56 pm

I want 2 upcoming picks. I have two 2nd rounders (#11 and #16). I would like to package them separately for two different upcoming picks. I have my eye on two players that I want to build around together. I won't be in all day, but I will be available by e-mail.

LJ4pointplay@gmail.com

Posting on this is a pain from my phone, so e-mail is easier.

Post #423 » by **magnumt** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:18 pm

In the chat now for anyone who...well, wants to chat. :lol:

--Mags

Mecca · Post #424 » by **Mecca** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:28 pm

Am I the only one that doesn't like a Nash/Roy duo? Roy needs the ball to be efficient, and Nash is one of the best playmakers in the NBA. I would have went for a top big man, imo.

2010 · Post #425 » by **2010** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:31 pm

xKLNx Phenom wrote:Am I the only one that doesn't like a Nash/Roy duo? Roy needs the ball to be efficient, and Nash is one of the best playmakers in the NBA. I would have went for a top big man, imo.

I agree with you. I was thinking the same exact thing. I just cannot picture Roy playing off the ball like some catch & shoot 2G. He is at his best as a facilitator and with Nash that will be nearly impossible. Nice names in that backcourt but not sure if the chemistry would mesh.

Subway Token · Post #426 » by **Subway Token** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:32 pm

xKLNx Phenom wrote:Am I the only one that doesn't like a Nash/Roy duo? Roy needs the ball to be efficient, and Nash is one of the best playmakers in the NBA. I would have went for a top big man, imo.

+1

ctorres · Post #427 » by **ctorres** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:40 pm

I think with Roy, Nash would play more off the ball as a shooter.

Rich2Hassan · Post #428 » by **Rich2Hassan** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:44 pm

ctorres wrote:I think with Roy, Nash would play more off the ball as a shooter.

Yeah. Roy & Nash is an ok combo, 2K2 just gotta surround them with the right pieces. but i thought for sure he would go big with that pick.

swisscheeseD · Post #429 » by **swisscheeseD** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:47 pm

2k2....if you want to make up for your mistake (:wink:) I'll take Nash off your hands. I got #25 upcoming!

2010 · Post #430 » by **2010** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:54 pm

ctorres wrote:I think with Roy, Nash would play more off the ball as a shooter.

So you'd marginalize Nash's biggest asset (playmaking ability as an assist man) by having him on the wing as a shooter? Makes no sense!

Jstarks3 · Post #431 » by **Jstarks3** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 4:55 pm

agree with 2010. no need for basically 2 premium facilitators on one team.

Post #432 » by **moocow007** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 5:09 pm

Ok I updated the "original" draft orders for rounds 5 throuh 13. So at least now we have a full chart. Have not had a chance to update the list based on trades. So until then, you guys need to know who is picking when. If you forget and a GM that you got the pick from picks...well...you're screwed. So please PLEASE make sure you know which picks are actually yours until a mod gets a chance to update the full list to reflect all trades.

EDIT: I'm off by 10 in the later rounds, will correct later. Also started updating that monstrosity of a trade between Dallas and Houston (I hate you both).

swisscheeseD · Post #433 » by **swisscheeseD** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 6:59 pm

Last chance to get your bids in on #25.

ChrisJSmith36@gmail.com

ctorres · Post #434 » by **ctorres** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 7:29 pm

My picks are going to kick so much ass. It was well worth it to acquire the late/early consecutive picks.

Post #435 » by **moocow007** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 8:05 pm

OK. EVERYTHING is updated. Please double check if there's any mistakes.

bishnykfan · Post #436 » by **bishnykfan** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 8:06 pm

The Spurs will continue fielding offers for their early second round pick, #38 overall. Ideally looking to trade down lower in the second round, but all offers will be considered.

Post #437 » by **moocow007** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 8:07 pm

bishnykfan wrote:The Spurs will continue fielding offers for their early second round pick, #38 overall. Ideally looking to trade down lower in the second round, but all offers will be considered.

Hit me up somewhere around the 34th or 35th picks if you're interested in anything from me. If I get the feel that the players I'm focusing on is still on the board, I'd be interested.

swisscheeseD · Post #438 » by **swisscheeseD** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 8:13 pm

moocow007 wrote:OK. EVERYTHING is updated. Please double check if there's any mistakes.

Thanks for the update! I know my trade with ctorres was a bitch, sorry Moo.

Just one thing...You didn't update the remainder of my trade with KLN. The Mavs should have (172+232) and his Kings should have (276+390).

Thanks Moo!

Rich2Hassan · Post #439 » by **Rich2Hassan** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 8:15 pm

Moocow, you didn't update the 7th & 10th round of the Hawks & Wolves trade.

bishnykfan · Post #440 » by **bishnykfan** » Mon Aug 2, 2010 8:16 pm

moocow007 wrote:
bishnykfan wrote:The Spurs will continue fielding offers for their early second round pick, #38 overall. Ideally looking to trade down lower in the second round, but all offers will be considered.

Hit me up somewhere around the 34th or 35th picks if you're interested in anything from me. If I get the feel that the players I'm focusing on is still on the board, I'd be interested.

No problem, I will be on the road a lot of the day tomorrow, but will check my email throughout the day. If it is getting around that time, and your player(s) are still on the board, email me and I will get back to you.