Bargnani?
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, dakomish23, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, HerSports85
Re: Bargnani?
-
Juggynaut
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,947
- And1: 2,817
- Joined: Feb 14, 2010
-
Re: Bargnani?
Gay isn't that bad of a player if he doesn't take all the shots. Reason is he's actually a good defender with his athleticism.

Re: Bargnani?
-
rl2011
- Junior
- Posts: 470
- And1: 96
- Joined: Jan 02, 2012
Re: Bargnani?
raps r making Gay the face of their franchise.... they r not trading him
bargs is a bum, we dont need that loser here
bargs is a bum, we dont need that loser here
Re: Bargnani?
-
TheToothFairy
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,089
- And1: 297
- Joined: Jun 27, 2011
- Location: Under Your Pillow
Re: Bargnani?
I'm sick of these trade Chandler threads.
Y'all must have for gotten what is was like not to have a true Center
Y'all must have for gotten what is was like not to have a true Center
Re: Bargnani?
- DowNY
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,879
- And1: 10,366
- Joined: Dec 19, 2010
- Location: Your mom's crib, NYC
-
Re: Bargnani?
rl2011 wrote:raps r making Gay the face of their franchise.... they r not trading him
bargs is a bum, we dont need that loser here
Says who? They have a new GM & could go to the complete rebuilding/tank route. Keeping only young players with potential & good contracts like Val, Ross & maybe Lowry.
Re: Bargnani?
-
CKamm1
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,790
- And1: 164
- Joined: May 09, 2002
- Contact:
Re: Bargnani?
DowNY wrote:rl2011 wrote:raps r making Gay the face of their franchise.... they r not trading him
bargs is a bum, we dont need that loser here
Says who? They have a new GM & could go to the complete rebuilding/tank route. Keeping only young players with potential & good contracts like Val, Ross & maybe Lowry.
Even if new management want to deal him, his value is about as low as it has been so they shouldn't deal him now. Wait until the deadline or next offseason once he has hopefully put up some numbers and looks more attractive.
Re: Bargnani?
-
seren
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,720
- And1: 4,949
- Joined: Jul 21, 2002
Re: Bargnani?
I am not against taking a shot at Bargnani if nothing else is available. Not for Camby though. That is crazy talk. I'd do Novak+Camby. Works under checker. Saves serious money to Toronto. Doubtful that we will engage with Toronto given we are in the same division.
Re: Bargnani?
- GettinitDone
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,569
- And1: 4,677
- Joined: Feb 09, 2012
Re: Bargnani?
TheToothFairy wrote:I'm sick of these trade Chandler threads.
Y'all must have for gotten what is was like not to have a true Center
Did he play like a true C in the playoffs?
There you go.
It's not what he was, but what he is.
Re: Bargnani?
-
aggo
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,358
- And1: 8,481
- Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Re: Bargnani?
I have no problems taking bargs and other random scraps
the problem is, will they take amare?
if no, just hang up the phone
the problem is, will they take amare?
if no, just hang up the phone
Re: Bargnani?
-
TheToothFairy
- Banned User
- Posts: 6,089
- And1: 297
- Joined: Jun 27, 2011
- Location: Under Your Pillow
Re: Bargnani?
GettinitDone wrote:TheToothFairy wrote:I'm sick of these trade Chandler threads.
Y'all must have for gotten what is was like not to have a true Center
Did he play like a true C in the playoffs?
There you go.
It's not what he was, but what he is.
Yes he did
Bargnani is quoted as saying " I play Basketball, not Rebound Ball"
Re: Bargnani?
- GONYK
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 67,010
- And1: 45,779
- Joined: Jun 27, 2003
- Location: Brunson Gang
-
Re: Bargnani?
GettinitDone wrote:TheToothFairy wrote:I'm sick of these trade Chandler threads.
Y'all must have for gotten what is was like not to have a true Center
Did he play like a true C in the playoffs?
There you go.
It's not what he was, but what he is.
It takes a lot of balls, and significantly less brains, to say this when you are clamoring for Bargnani.
Bargs is a guard
Re: Bargnani?
-
djsunyc
- RealGM
- Posts: 100,246
- And1: 74,119
- Joined: Dec 28, 2003
Re: Bargnani?
would you do bargs + demar for shump + amare?
Re: Bargnani?
-
I_Love_NYK
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 122
- Joined: Aug 01, 2002
- Location: jersey city,nj
- Contact:
Re: Bargnani?
Raptors plan is to build off Gay and DeRozan. They would trade Lowery before Gay or DeRozan.
Re: Bargnani?
-
Thugger HBC
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
-
Re: Bargnani?
djsunyc wrote:would you do bargs + demar for shump + amare?
Our defense takes a massive hit, but the offense improves a decent notch.
The other two are a wash at best.
Toronto might do this since they'd be trading two overpaid players mainly the longer deal in Derozan, so in essence they are trading Derozan for Shump, but they gain a guy who wont play much at all.
it helps them financially for sure.
I might consider, derozan is a good guard, needs to get his defense in order.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Bargnani?
- StephNYKurry
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,669
- And1: 2,198
- Joined: May 11, 2011
Re: Bargnani?
djsunyc wrote:would you do bargs + demar for shump + amare?
Lateral move. Nope.
What do I care...it's rigged anyway
Re: Bargnani?
- GettinitDone
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,569
- And1: 4,677
- Joined: Feb 09, 2012
Re: Bargnani?
GONYK wrote:GettinitDone wrote:TheToothFairy wrote:I'm sick of these trade Chandler threads.
Y'all must have for gotten what is was like not to have a true Center
Did he play like a true C in the playoffs?
There you go.
It's not what he was, but what he is.
It takes a lot of balls, and significantly less brains, to say this when you are clamoring for Bargnani.
Bargs is a guard
The thing is Tyson is no longer good at the things he's supposed to be good at (rebounding and shot blocking), he didn't even challenge shots anymore, encouraging opposing players to drive to the rim.
If he remains bad at scoring, then he doesn't have one thing he's good at.
The point is Barg is at least good about one thing: scoring. When he's on, few can stop him. He had a down year, but he's still young. A little tough love from Woody, and a little legit scoring help from Melo should help bring his cock out.
Re: Bargnani?
-
Thugger HBC
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 49,679
- And1: 18,760
- Joined: Jan 14, 2011
- Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
-
Re: Bargnani?
GettinitDone wrote:GONYK wrote:GettinitDone wrote:
Did he play like a true C in the playoffs?
There you go.
It's not what he was, but what he is.
It takes a lot of balls, and significantly less brains, to say this when you are clamoring for Bargnani.
Bargs is a guard
The thing is Tyson is no longer good at the things he's supposed to be good at (rebounding and shot blocking), he didn't even challenge shots anymore, encouraging opposing players to drive to the rim.
If he remains bad at scoring, then he doesn't have one thing he's good at.
The point is Barg is at least good about one thing: scoring. When he's on, few can stop him. He had a down year, but he's still young. A little tough love from Woody, and a little legit scoring help from Melo should help bring his cock out.
When Bargs is on he hits less than half his shots and it wasn't just one year, it's been three.
He'll also be 28 by camp starting, so he is what he is at this point.
Removing Tyson for Bargs is a pretty silly trade.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Gone, but will never be forgotten
Re: Bargnani?
-
seren
- RealGM
- Posts: 24,720
- And1: 4,949
- Joined: Jul 21, 2002
Re: Bargnani?
the notion that Tyson is "no longer good" after a bad stretch is exaggeration. he had a very solid start to the season. he was an all-star for a reason. felton's injury resulted us using him less and less on the offensive end and his own injuries resulted him decline on defense too. for all I know, Tyson can easily come back as the previous season Tyson next season. would be incredibly stupid to give him up for a bust like Bargnani.
Re: Bargnani?
-
I_Love_NYK
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,836
- And1: 122
- Joined: Aug 01, 2002
- Location: jersey city,nj
- Contact:
Re: Bargnani?
The thought of trading Tyson for Bargiani is stupid. Hibbert would go for 20 and 20 every night, if Bargiani was to guard him.
Re: Bargnani?
- Fat Kat
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,182
- And1: 36,287
- Joined: Apr 19, 2004
-
Re: Bargnani?
BowlRips wrote:cant wait for the bargs for novak and camby trade to go down
Sun Jun 02, 2013
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®













