PG: We survived 4-1
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Reign23
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,688
- And1: 12,457
- Joined: Dec 29, 2014
- Location: Germany.
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
just wanted to stop by and say that the bust aka only 3 and d looked really good.
ah and WE BACK.
have a nice weekend everyone.
ah and WE BACK.
have a nice weekend everyone.
formerly known as knickst4pe
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- DaGawd
- RealGM
- Posts: 38,686
- And1: 51,629
- Joined: Mar 11, 2014
- Location: Queens, NY
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
BigShot Barrett wrote:F N 11 wrote:
Johnnie Bryant got in the lab with RJ on finishes for sure. I did not see them slow dragging feet layups. He just straight took it!
Barrett desperately needs a crossover...
Facts.. upping his handle is what will elevate him. As of now he has a difficult time for the most part getting by his man one on one without a screen
BaF
Washington Wizards
Washington Wizards
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,762
- And1: 2,876
- Joined: Oct 29, 2004
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
GONYK wrote:snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
He's a cream puff for the most part. Solid defender, but name garners more hype than the game.
Lonzo’s been good so far. That may not have been as apparent last night. But he’s been making plays all over the place thus far. Very happy with this signing from our perspective.
With that said, given NYK’s current guard situation, you guys wouldn’t have had much of a need for a player like Lonzo. We do though.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- BKlutch
- RealGM
- Posts: 18,139
- And1: 16,214
- Joined: Jan 11, 2015
- Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Angryfatboy wrote:Kemba is currently shooting 52% from 3
W
T
F
Because, as so many said earlier on, Kemba = Elf!
.
____________________
____________________
* We have a Brunson Burner™ * 
* Make the Knicks Champs Again *
** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** 
____________________
____________________
.
.
____________________
____________________


* Make the Knicks Champs Again *


____________________
____________________
.
.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,558
- And1: 2,140
- Joined: Nov 23, 2005
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,529
- And1: 9,531
- Joined: Dec 09, 2011
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Richard4444 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:DaGawd wrote:SGA would have to force his way here because there would be plenty of suitors.. but he’s definitely someone I’m willing to trade almost anything for
Me too. But, does he make the Knicks championship contenders?
I dont know. But if we trade the farm for a single player. He is our best option.
Thibs is our coach, we cant afford to be trading the farm for anybody that cant play at least as many minutes as randle or barrett if not more. Thats not even taking into account that having a deep team is absolutely essential to a thibs coached team in the playoffs
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- GONYK
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 66,898
- And1: 45,507
- Joined: Jun 27, 2003
- Location: Brunson Gang
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Milk wrote:
The eye test backs it up too. Great positioning, moving his feet really well, using his strength, etc
Add RJ's improvement around the rim so far this season, and we're seeing some significant progress
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- GONYK
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 66,898
- And1: 45,507
- Joined: Jun 27, 2003
- Location: Brunson Gang
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Betta Bulleavit wrote:GONYK wrote:snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
He's a cream puff for the most part. Solid defender, but name garners more hype than the game.
Lonzo’s been good so far. That may not have been as apparent last night. But he’s been making plays all over the place thus far. Very happy with this signing from our perspective.
With that said, given NYK’s current guard situation, you guys wouldn’t have had much of a need for a player like Lonzo. We do though.
Lonzo is undoubtedly a starter on every team in the league, so I have no doubt he provides value.
But everything is contextual with him. He's content to do everything in the margins offensively.
Defensively, I have no issues with him.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Kampuchea
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,321
- And1: 9,251
- Joined: Oct 20, 2010
- Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrFOb_f7ubw
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
Not so sure. A 3&D player that will also get you 5 rebounds and 5 assists a game is pretty valuable. And his defense seemed even above normal 3&D status, elite defense.
He didn’t shoot well against us and will have a tough time against good defense, he seems worthy the contract though. Not overpaid or underpaid, valued just right.

Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,395
- And1: 95,073
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Betta Bulleavit wrote:GONYK wrote:snadler wrote:So glad knicks didn't sign Ball
He's a cream puff for the most part. Solid defender, but name garners more hype than the game.
Lonzo’s been good so far. That may not have been as apparent last night. But he’s been making plays all over the place thus far. Very happy with this signing from our perspective.
With that said, given NYK’s current guard situation, you guys wouldn’t have had much of a need for a player like Lonzo. We do though.
There were people here who wanted him BEFORE Kemba became the option.
Even though Fournier would have mitigated the need for a penetrating PG some, don't think Ball is what the Knicks could have used, even though I'm a fan and actually kind of wanted the Knicks to sign him.
Also, seems like the Knicks are eyeing moves either this year or next and committing to 4 years of Ball on top of 3 of Fournier messes up with some plan the Knicks FO seems to be working on, or hoping for.

Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Deeeez Knicks
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 49,240
- And1: 55,141
- Joined: Nov 12, 2004
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
GONYK wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:Milk wrote:
The eye test backs it up too. Great positioning, moving his feet really well, using his strength, etc
Add RJ's improvement around the rim so far this season, and we're seeing some significant progress
He has been getting some good midrange looks over the first few games and got some to go down. Hit a few floaters in this one. Can see him piecing it together for sure and getting better.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- Senior
- Posts: 719
- And1: 203
- Joined: Sep 17, 2019
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Forget trading for anybody. Let this homegrown team improve every game. We continue to draft well which will make it tougher this off season on who will be cut because we are going to wind up with two or three new players from the draft.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Tron Carter
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,534
- And1: 20,138
- Joined: Jul 20, 2012
- Location: NBA Purgatory
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Love the delusional bulls fans acting like this is some moral victory for them. As if the Knicks didn’t dominate them for the majority of the game (on the road no less) and didn’t need an epic choke job to let them back in it at the end.
Their paint defense is non existent. I don’t think I saw Vuc contest one shot or fight for a single rebound, dude is a charmin soft big.
Lonzo is still allergic to layups. Passing out of wide open driving lanes because he’s a shot finisher at the rim. He’s not a point guard.
Derozan with his typical net negative plus/minus night. Trash ass signing.
Their paint defense is non existent. I don’t think I saw Vuc contest one shot or fight for a single rebound, dude is a charmin soft big.
Lonzo is still allergic to layups. Passing out of wide open driving lanes because he’s a shot finisher at the rim. He’s not a point guard.
Derozan with his typical net negative plus/minus night. Trash ass signing.

R.I.P Black Mamba
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,368
- And1: 7,156
- Joined: Dec 28, 2018
- Location: São Paulo, Brasil
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Oscirus wrote:Richard4444 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Me too. But, does he make the Knicks championship contenders?
I dont know. But if we trade the farm for a single player. He is our best option.
Thibs is our coach, we cant afford to be trading the farm for anybody that cant play at least as many minutes as randle or barrett if not more. Thats not even taking into account that having a deep team is absolutely essential to a thibs coached team in the playoffs
SGA averages 34 minutes and I think he could play even more minutes. And the team can stay deep even if we had to trade RJ, Obi and IQ plus Noel and Knox as fillers. You only need to get some vets, buyouts to complete the rotation.
The problem in getting SGA is it will make our wing defense even weaker assuming will give RJ in a trade.
Kemba/Rose
SGA/Grimes
Fournier/?
Randle/?
Mitch/Taj
Maybe we can be even more competitive getting a wing defender like Grant while keeping RJ.
BAF Brooklyn - Pre-Season NBA 2K Simulation 2023 Champions.
Brunson/Nembhard/Micic
IQ/Strus/Ben Sheppard
Butler/Nesmith/Watford
Batum/Boucher/Morris/
Embiid/Plumlee/Landale/
Brunson/Nembhard/Micic
IQ/Strus/Ben Sheppard
Butler/Nesmith/Watford
Batum/Boucher/Morris/
Embiid/Plumlee/Landale/
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Tron Carter
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,534
- And1: 20,138
- Joined: Jul 20, 2012
- Location: NBA Purgatory
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Lavine also makes Kemba Walker look like Gary Payton on defense. Hard pass on that fraud. Let the Bulls max him out.

R.I.P Black Mamba
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 94,962
- And1: 136,063
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- NYKnickerbocker
- RealGM
- Posts: 19,842
- And1: 14,248
- Joined: Oct 10, 2012
- Location: Queens
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
He can take Fournier spot with ease for me lolTron Carter wrote:Lavine also makes Kemba Walker look like Gary Payton on defense. Hard pass on that fraud. Let the Bulls max him out.
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,529
- And1: 9,531
- Joined: Dec 09, 2011
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Richard4444 wrote:Oscirus wrote:Richard4444 wrote:
I dont know. But if we trade the farm for a single player. He is our best option.
Thibs is our coach, we cant afford to be trading the farm for anybody that cant play at least as many minutes as randle or barrett if not more. Thats not even taking into account that having a deep team is absolutely essential to a thibs coached team in the playoffs
SGA averages 34 minutes and I think he could play even more minutes. And the team can stay deep even if we had to trade RJ, Obi and IQ plus Noel and Knox as fillers. You only need to get some vets, buyouts to complete the rotation.
The problem in getting SGA is it will make our wing defense even weaker assuming will give RJ in a trade.
Kemba/Rose
SGA/Grimes
Fournier/?
Randle/?
Mitch/Taj
Maybe we can be even more competitive getting a wing defender like Grant while keeping RJ.
We not getting an elite player for what would amount to a starter, a rotation player, a trash heap center, an on/off shooter and a tenth man. It starts rj obi fournier robinson and alot of firsts, dont know where it ends. Regardless it would destroy our depth.
Jimmit79 wrote:At this point I want RJ to get paid
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
- Im Coming Home
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,516
- And1: 20,214
- Joined: Dec 08, 2009
- Location: The Island
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Gotta love some of the posts on the Bulls board..
'calls went the other way' says the guy whos team was getting gifted calls the last 3 mins to even make that comeback possible while the Knicks were getting hacked and no-call OKAYYYYYYYYY
Bulls Fan #1 wrote:We're better than the Knicks. Shots didn't fall, calls went the other way, we missed many defensive rotations and gave up offensive rebounds, and still only lost by one.
On to the next game.










'calls went the other way' says the guy whos team was getting gifted calls the last 3 mins to even make that comeback possible while the Knicks were getting hacked and no-call OKAYYYYYYYYY
RGM Knicks BAF- Houston Rockets

PG: Cunningham | Small | Ja. Butler
SG: Au. Thompson | Ja. Butler |
SF: B.Ingram | Bullock | LaRavia
PF: Porter Jr. | GG Jackson | Love
C: Jackson Jr. | Eubanks

PG: Cunningham | Small | Ja. Butler
SG: Au. Thompson | Ja. Butler |
SF: B.Ingram | Bullock | LaRavia
PF: Porter Jr. | GG Jackson | Love
C: Jackson Jr. | Eubanks
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,115
- And1: 6,247
- Joined: Oct 31, 2014
-
Re: PG: We survived 4-1
Im Coming Home wrote:Gotta love some of the posts on the Bulls board..Bulls Fan #1 wrote:We're better than the Knicks. Shots didn't fall, calls went the other way, we missed many defensive rotations and gave up offensive rebounds, and still only lost by one.
On to the next game.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
'calls went the other way' says the guy whos team was getting gifted calls the last 3 mins to even make that comeback possible while the Knicks were getting hacked and no-call OKAYYYYYYYYY
Im definitely not touching the Bulls board lol but yes there’s no way you can watch that game and think the Bulls are definitively better especially since it took a collapse at the end to even make it a game. It was very much a Knicks dominating performance for most of the game.