FutureKnicksGM wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:FutureKnicksGM wrote:
Its this years. But last year Randle was 'touching the ball' to much and still 'inefficient' and all that stuff you have figured out. But fine divert away.
We're 11-9. What's our record end up this season, if we can get rid of the guy who you say is making us worse on both sides of the ball?
So it's not last year? I gave you numbers from this year, do you have anything to say about those? The less Randle has the ball this year has worked out for us, when he's been on the court this year we have been an inefficient offensive team that barely plays defense. Do you have anything to refute the numbers from this year?
You don't win basketball games or championships by individual ratings. Clearly there is minimal context applied.
You think Randle makes us a worse team. Translate whatever rating/count you want that into the most simple (and important stat) - wins.
Without Randle holding us back, how many more wins do we get in comparison to a team with Juilius. This year. It really is a simple question.

We're not winning a championship with Randle, and you do win basketball games by going after highly efficient players. Your argument is basically throw out all the stats because you don't like them, instead lets go with a question that can't be answered.