Ravenxvirall wrote:Damn does espn really have the pacers at a 53 percent chance to win the series? We got home court and still dogs?
At this point, let them have their moment. We know who's gonna win. Bet accordingly.
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Ravenxvirall wrote:Damn does espn really have the pacers at a 53 percent chance to win the series? We got home court and still dogs?
HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HEZI wrote:Indiana is a very efficient scoring team. Best in the playoffs. Their offense is a well oiled machine so if we are able to slow them down that would say a lot about how far our defense has come. They are probably a better offensive team than Boston. They will be the toughest matchup because they have so many different weapons but defensively they might be the weakest matchup so we should be able to get our offense going too.
Look at who they've played, the best perimeter defender they've seen so far is Dean Wade or Max Struss![]()
It's easy to look like a well oiled machine when you're playing injured teams. A healthy Boston team had a better ORTG then them on the seaso, and a better ORTG while playing a better defensive team in the Magic in the first round.
Their offense is more balanced than Boston so they are harder to defend. Boston only spams 3 pointers so they will shoot themselves out of games as we’ve seen. Indiana moves the ball well and has a balanced inside out attack. I doubt we can keep them under 100 three times like with Boston
Ravenxvirall wrote:Damn does espn really have the pacers at a 53 percent chance to win the series? We got home court and still dogs?
TheGreenArrow wrote:Letss go Twolves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NoDopeOnSundays wrote:HEZI wrote:NoDopeOnSundays wrote:
Look at who they've played, the best perimeter defender they've seen so far is Dean Wade or Max Struss![]()
It's easy to look like a well oiled machine when you're playing injured teams. A healthy Boston team had a better ORTG then them on the seaso, and a better ORTG while playing a better defensive team in the Magic in the first round.
Their offense is more balanced than Boston so they are harder to defend. Boston only spams 3 pointers so they will shoot themselves out of games as we’ve seen. Indiana moves the ball well and has a balanced inside out attack. I doubt we can keep them under 100 three times like with Boston
The rely on pushing pace, they would have more trouble scoring in the half court than the Celtics have. If we get sucked into playing their game then yeah they're more balanced but they also have more things that can go wrong, like what happens if we can switch and contain in the half court, then what? They don't have any tier 1 scorers to fall back on. The Celtics can get stupid at times with the threes but there's just a lot more pressure their offense can put on a team in the half court because there's 4 different guys that can attack closeouts, 2 high level creators and 2 decent to good playmakers with those guys.


TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
Iron Mantis wrote:Y'all do realize this is the Knicks vs Pacers thread right?
mpharris36 wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
dude get this **** out of the Knicks thread...put it in all around the NBA

TheGreenArrow wrote:mpharris36 wrote:TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
dude get this **** out of the Knicks thread...put it in all around the NBA
Relax Mp it was a mistake!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It happens!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I’ll be better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


TheGreenArrow wrote:Wrong thread!!!!!!!!!!!