Garbagelo wrote:This is the Scott Perry I knew
EXPOSED
yes lets sign an injured player that is old and make the same mistakes from the past.
Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks
Garbagelo wrote:This is the Scott Perry I knew
EXPOSED

god shammgod wrote:dakomish23 wrote:god shammgod wrote:
i think they have 40 mill left
And who are they giving it to
who knows. as long as the contracts are short it doen't matter that much.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
Hes_On_Fire wrote:Taj Gibson can still play but $10 million per year and then going 2 years instead of 1 is laughable.
You're all sitting here yelling at Perry too. This is falling right into Mills' plan to have Perry be the eventual fall guy. A guy like Mills doesn't survive in MSG that long without slithering his way around.

Deeeez Knicks wrote:Stannis wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:You know its bad. Its hour 3 and the knicks are issuing all kinds of PR statements
Where are you seeing all of this?
Deeeez Knicks wrote:Stannis wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:You know its bad. Its hour 3 and the knicks are issuing all kinds of PR statements
Where are you seeing all of this?
mpharris36 wrote:perry can make up for all this with one trade to rip off the t-wolves...one deal changes my whole tune of this offseason...do it you jamoke!
F N 11 wrote:Knicks all in on these kids developing.

Jose7 wrote:the only vet I wanted to give a two year deal two of 20+M was beverly...
meh
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
aq_ua wrote:god shammgod wrote:unless kd regains his mvp form, nothing happened in free agency to change anything much so far. the lakers trade for ad is the only thing that moved the needle.
Depending on where Kawhi ends up, the Bucks are the only team of significance in the east and quite a bit of parity across the board. The tank race will be hot.

Da_Mane_Man wrote:mpharris36 wrote:perry can make up for all this with one trade to rip off the t-wolves...one deal changes my whole tune of this offseason...do it you jamoke!
agreed.
Can anyone explain why you would add a 3rd year to Randle's deal without a team option? If that was the deal breaker, then you let him walk. I don't get it.

mpharris36 wrote:god shammgod wrote:dakomish23 wrote:
And who are they giving it to
who knows. as long as the contracts are short it doen't matter that much.
if does if they keep paying meh role players who will just take time away from our young developing players...like if reggie bullock takes minutes from dotson/frank/rj/knox or the combo of that I will not be pleased.

Stannis wrote:
To me, it sounds like he was ready to offer him the max.