post game - that sucked
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: post game - that sucked
- stuporman
- RealGM
- Posts: 32,000
- And1: 20,994
- Joined: Nov 27, 2005
- Location: optimistic skeptical realist
Re: post game - that sucked
They unveiled a statue in NY in honor of RJ's last shot..... it's what every Knicks fan looked like after it.
If you'd rather see your team fail so you can be right
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.
?
Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
...you are a fan of your opinion not the team.

Knowledge is just information stuffed into a mental bag
Wisdom is knowing what to pull out of the bag to do the job
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,090
- And1: 14,457
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: post game - that sucked
GONYK wrote:cgf wrote:GONYK wrote:
What if its just 2 years of DD?
I just don't like the idea of putting DeRozan in RJ's way next year because they would get in each others way too much unless we restricted RJ to an offball-shooting role. And I don't like that idea because we don't want RJ starting to learn how to create when we're ready to make deep runs, we want him to have already figured that out by then so that all we have to worry about when we add that final piece, is establishing chemistry.
Lowry on a two-year deal at least makes sense to me cause he wouldn't be getting in anyone's way, but signing Demar just feels counter-productive.
If we're lucky enough to have the choice between Lowry and DD for 2 years, I agree Lowry is the better option.
I don't think we'll have the choice.
Me neither as I think both will get longer offers, but I didn't wanna be obstinant & tried to answer the question assuming that hypothetical did present itself to us.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: post game - that sucked
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 137,890
- And1: 136,216
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: post game - that sucked
GONYK wrote:cgf wrote:GONYK wrote:
What if its just 2 years of DD?
I just don't like the idea of putting DeRozan in RJ's way next year because they would get in each others way too much unless we restricted RJ to an offball-shooting role. And I don't like that idea because we don't want RJ starting to learn how to create when we're ready to make deep runs, we want him to have already figured that out by then so that all we have to worry about when we add that final piece, is establishing chemistry.
Lowry on a two-year deal at least makes sense to me cause he wouldn't be getting in anyone's way, but signing Demar just feels counter-productive.
If we're lucky enough to have the choice between Lowry and DD for 2 years, I agree Lowry is the better option.
I don't think we'll have the choice.
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again

Re: post game - that sucked
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,081
- And1: 14,565
- Joined: Jun 14, 2012
-
Re: post game - that sucked
prophet_of_rage wrote:It's not Coach Carter fantasy. That play was fine. It was just poorly executed. Thibs over relies on one on one creation and one on one rim protection throughout the game.Knicksfan1992 wrote:god shammgod wrote:
most competitive games end in your best player isoing
Yeah people have this like Coach Carter fantasy that the coach draws up a magical play that gets you the perfect shot but 95 times out of 100 it doesn't work like that lol.
I think Thibs thought he had enough time to cause rotation on the defense to get Julius attacking a scrambling defense or if Rose could get his push shot off in P&R then he would live with it and hope Taj could get another opp if he missed. Timing was off and Rose shouldn't have picked up his dribble. Then gave it to RJ in a tough spot. Is what it is.
But in a game decided by 6 points or fewer that's on coaching. 10 points or more is on the players. 7-9 you just lost.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
Is it over-reliance or him coaching to the personnel he's given? I'm leaning towards the latter as I think any reasonable person would suggest because blaming this game on Thibs is pure madness to me lol. The only thing you can really ding him for is Payton which I don't feel like beating a dead horse about...
Re: post game - that sucked
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 137,890
- And1: 136,216
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: post game - that sucked
i just watched the end of regulation and rj not boxing out matthews was worse than the shot in ot. yeah, blame him. lol
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,090
- And1: 14,457
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: post game - that sucked
thebuzzardman wrote:cgf wrote:GONYK wrote:
What if its just 2 years of DD?
I just don't like the idea of putting DeRozan in RJ's way next year because they would get in each others way too much unless we restricted RJ to an offball-shooting role. And I don't like that idea because we don't want RJ starting to learn how to create when we're ready to make deep runs, we want him to have already figured that out by then so that all we have to worry about when we add that final piece, is establishing chemistry.
Lowry on a two-year deal at least makes sense to me cause he wouldn't be getting in anyone's way, but signing Demar just feels counter-productive.
How much do Pandemic P and Kawhi get in each other's way?
Only a little, but Pandemic P & Kawhi aren't also playing off of Julius. If they did have some bigger star that both had to play off of, they would get in each other's way quite a bit more.
Plus neither George nor Kawhi is still developing, and both are much bigger threats from outside than Demar.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,845
- And1: 9,493
- Joined: Jan 10, 2019
-
Re: post game - that sucked
3toheadmelo wrote:Zenzibar wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:i might just be all in on derozan. we really need another creator next to Randle. if derozan is the best we can get then go for it.
Hold out for:
i don’t see the Knicks waiting another year for him
I think as part of the 5 year plan to compete in the Finals, they'll wait. There's still alot of work to do with the salary cap this year, incorporating Luca if he's as good as advertised and Mitch, IQ and RJ's development.
Getting to the playoffs was a bonus this year, a possible second round entry a HUGE surprise and perhaps a year 2 goal.
Derozan is not the guy you want to tie up your cap with, you know better.
Stop All Genocides
Re: post game - that sucked
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 137,890
- And1: 136,216
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: post game - that sucked
rj can wait 2 years and show he deserves more than being in the corner
Re: post game - that sucked
- 3toheadmelo
- RealGM
- Posts: 94,985
- And1: 136,089
- Joined: Feb 15, 2015
-
Re: post game - that sucked
god shammgod wrote:GONYK wrote:cgf wrote:I just don't like the idea of putting DeRozan in RJ's way next year because they would get in each others way too much unless we restricted RJ to an offball-shooting role. And I don't like that idea because we don't want RJ starting to learn how to create when we're ready to make deep runs, we want him to have already figured that out by then so that all we have to worry about when we add that final piece, is establishing chemistry.
Lowry on a two-year deal at least makes sense to me cause he wouldn't be getting in anyone's way, but signing Demar just feels counter-productive.
If we're lucky enough to have the choice between Lowry and DD for 2 years, I agree Lowry is the better option.
I don't think we'll have the choice.
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again
Lowry is going to Philly or Miami. if he goes to Miami, we might be able to get Kendrick Nunn off them. would you go after him? i wouldn’t mind him

It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,090
- And1: 14,457
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: post game - that sucked
god shammgod wrote:GONYK wrote:cgf wrote:I just don't like the idea of putting DeRozan in RJ's way next year because they would get in each others way too much unless we restricted RJ to an offball-shooting role. And I don't like that idea because we don't want RJ starting to learn how to create when we're ready to make deep runs, we want him to have already figured that out by then so that all we have to worry about when we add that final piece, is establishing chemistry.
Lowry on a two-year deal at least makes sense to me cause he wouldn't be getting in anyone's way, but signing Demar just feels counter-productive.
If we're lucky enough to have the choice between Lowry and DD for 2 years, I agree Lowry is the better option.
I don't think we'll have the choice.
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again
...thus why I suggest Lonzo or Schröder instead

Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: post game - that sucked
- GONYK
- Forum Mod - Knicks
- Posts: 66,901
- And1: 45,514
- Joined: Jun 27, 2003
- Location: Brunson Gang
-
Re: post game - that sucked
Knicksfan1992 wrote:prophet_of_rage wrote:It's not Coach Carter fantasy. That play was fine. It was just poorly executed. Thibs over relies on one on one creation and one on one rim protection throughout the game.Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Yeah people have this like Coach Carter fantasy that the coach draws up a magical play that gets you the perfect shot but 95 times out of 100 it doesn't work like that lol.
I think Thibs thought he had enough time to cause rotation on the defense to get Julius attacking a scrambling defense or if Rose could get his push shot off in P&R then he would live with it and hope Taj could get another opp if he missed. Timing was off and Rose shouldn't have picked up his dribble. Then gave it to RJ in a tough spot. Is what it is.
But in a game decided by 6 points or fewer that's on coaching. 10 points or more is on the players. 7-9 you just lost.
Sent from my SM-N970W using Tapatalk
Is it over-reliance or him coaching to the personnel he's given? I'm leaning towards the latter as I think any reasonable person would suggest because blaming this game on Thibs is pure madness to me lol. The only thing you can really ding him for is Payton which I don't feel like beating a dead horse about...
I'm not blaming Thibs for the loss. I'm blaming Thibs for not being less predictable.
There are a lot of issues that led to the loss, with rebounding being the main one. We're light in the pants up front.
Re: post game - that sucked
- god shammgod
- RealGM
- Posts: 137,890
- And1: 136,216
- Joined: Feb 18, 2006
Re: post game - that sucked
3toheadmelo wrote:god shammgod wrote:GONYK wrote:
If we're lucky enough to have the choice between Lowry and DD for 2 years, I agree Lowry is the better option.
I don't think we'll have the choice.
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again
Lowry is going to Philly or Miami. if he goes to Miami, we might be able to get Kendrick Nunn off them. would you go after him? i wouldn’t mind him
they still might match. lowry only has so long before it's over.
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,081
- And1: 14,565
- Joined: Jun 14, 2012
-
Re: post game - that sucked
3toheadmelo wrote:god shammgod wrote:GONYK wrote:
If we're lucky enough to have the choice between Lowry and DD for 2 years, I agree Lowry is the better option.
I don't think we'll have the choice.
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again
Lowry is going to Philly or Miami. if he goes to Miami, we might be able to get Kendrick Nunn off them. would you go after him? i wouldn’t mind him
Depends though. Are they willing to pay over 30 million? I doubt it. If the Knick want Lowry they can bowl him over with money way more than any other team can unless they want to gut their roster in a sign and trade
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 35,090
- And1: 14,457
- Joined: Jul 01, 2008
-
Re: post game - that sucked
Zenzibar wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Zenzibar wrote:
Hold out for:
i don’t see the Knicks waiting another year for him
I think as part of the 5 year plan to compete in the Finals, they'll wait. There's still alot of work to do with the salary cap this year, incorporating Luca if he's as good as advertised and Mitch, IQ and RJ's development.
Getting to the playoffs was a bonus this year, a possible second round entry a HUGE surprise and perhaps a year 2 goal.
Derozan is not the guy you want to tie up your cap with, you know better.
I wouldn't be banking on anything from Luca until he shows he can (at least) fill Burks' shoes.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,845
- And1: 9,493
- Joined: Jan 10, 2019
-
Re: post game - that sucked
Phish Tank wrote:People need to realize that the Lakers intentionally gameplanned to shut down RJ & Bullock. This effectively resulted in the Knicks playing 1v5 on offense with the starting lineup and 2v5 when Elf sat. That's really what it boiled down to.
And yes - Randle's carried us this season. But he's not just a walking bucket like Dame Lillard who can get his own easily. The Lakers gameplanned against him and adjusted in the 2nd half and OT. Those turnovers he had were the result of tight defense because no one else was even remotely open.
Again - this all boils down to a lack of talent in most regards, especially having THAT guy who can easily get his own when need be. The Knicks remarkably did well keeping AD at bay... just took a huge THT 3 and Wes putback to kill us.
Exactly. The Lakers are #1 in defense for a reason. Look at the final score 101-99 unheard of for an overtime game in this era of 3pt offensive focus.
Both teams are defensively legit.
Stop All Genocides
Re: post game - that sucked
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,424
- And1: 95,102
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: post game - that sucked
god shammgod wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:god shammgod wrote:
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again
Lowry is going to Philly or Miami. if he goes to Miami, we might be able to get Kendrick Nunn off them. would you go after him? i wouldn’t mind him
they still might match. lowry only has so long before it's over.
Over looked like happened this season, for Lowry

Re: post game - that sucked
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,987
- And1: 2,274
- Joined: Nov 21, 2007
Re: post game - that sucked
thebuzzardman wrote:RJ gonna have to work much harder at sucking to catch up to the gold, silver and bronze bust medalists of Knox, Frank and Obi.
Obi's been improving, though. He used to look completely lost out there, but he seems to have found a role lately.
Still commits boneheaded fouls every so often, but he can work on that.
'Every night ending in 'Y' is a rock fight when you're playing the New York Knicks.' - World Wide Wob
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,041
- And1: 8,090
- Joined: Dec 25, 2016
- Location: Bridgeport, NY
- Contact:
-
Re: post game - that sucked
KnixtapeH20 wrote:nedleeds wrote:Fake covid season reality show continues. Payton with the -8 in 13 minutes, clutching the pics of Leon Rose in a Thai brothel. We're a Trae sprained ankle, Giannis day off and 3 protocol violations from the 10th seed.
Don't understand the last sentence?
There have been so many crazy circumstances, and games lost by opponents early when we had no covid absences at the start of the year. We hit a bunch of teams who just didn't play their players (Bucks), Trae sprains his ankle and we come back to win a key head to head. So much opponents bad shooting luck this year. I think we're a very fake 4-5 seed. Now the injury luck isn't going our way with Mitch, now Quickly and Burks. In a normal 82 game season assuming Randle and RJs progress was the same I think we'd be lucky to be an 8th seed in the East.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
Re: post game - that sucked
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,041
- And1: 8,090
- Joined: Dec 25, 2016
- Location: Bridgeport, NY
- Contact:
-
Re: post game - that sucked
Knicksfan1992 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:god shammgod wrote:
the only way lowry comes is if he decides he wants to play with derozan again
Lowry is going to Philly or Miami. if he goes to Miami, we might be able to get Kendrick Nunn off them. would you go after him? i wouldn’t mind him
Depends though. Are they willing to pay over 30 million? I doubt it. If the Knick want Lowry they can bowl him over with money way more than any other team can unless they want to gut their roster in a sign and trade
They can bowl him over with a buffet he's fat as **** this season.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
Re: post game - that sucked
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 81,424
- And1: 95,102
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: post game - that sucked
makeitstop wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:RJ gonna have to work much harder at sucking to catch up to the gold, silver and bronze bust medalists of Knox, Frank and Obi.
Obi's been improving, though. He used to look completely lost out there, but he seems to have found a role lately.
Still commits boneheaded fouls every so often, but he can work on that.
That's why he's only a bronze medalist!

