Fat Kat wrote:
And OG did this so quietly and efficiently. And this is what we get at the end of the game. Nice.
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully
Fat Kat wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:Monk1718 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:he would have to give up bam though which i don't ever see him doing
A trade around bam could probably beat every offer. I think they would do it for embiid.
eh idk. pat talks about bam in the same light as alonzo mourning and d wade. i think they rather get a perimeter star next to butler and bam. that's why they were trying to get donovan mitchell.
web123888 wrote:No Knicks fan but with the bright young future and Brunson's rise to elite status, Embiid could put you over the top as championship favorites. Even though he's not the most popular man in New York, he should request a trade to NY and it would mean a great chance at a ring.
Stannis wrote:web123888 wrote:No Knicks fan but with the bright young future and Brunson's rise to elite status, Embiid could put you over the top as championship favorites. Even though he's not the most popular man in New York, he should request a trade to NY and it would mean a great chance at a ring.
I'll be honest, I think an Embiid trade is quite risky. His body just looks like it has a lot of mileage.
I wouldn't be surprised if he trade all the picks for him and he just gets totaled on arrival. Antonio McDyess style. Or maybe just give us 1 good year and become our new Amar'e.

Monk1718 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Monk1718 wrote:A trade around bam could probably beat every offer. I think they would do it for embiid.
eh idk. pat talks about bam in the same light as alonzo mourning and d wade. i think they rather get a perimeter star next to butler and bam. that's why they were trying to get donovan mitchell.
Who do you see them giving up to get Mitchell without adding bam or jimmy? You think they have the assets to get something like that done? Not a rhetorical question I’m just not much up on Miami’s situation.

Context wrote:Stannis wrote:web123888 wrote:No Knicks fan but with the bright young future and Brunson's rise to elite status, Embiid could put you over the top as championship favorites. Even though he's not the most popular man in New York, he should request a trade to NY and it would mean a great chance at a ring.
I'll be honest, I think an Embiid trade is quite risky. His body just looks like it has a lot of mileage.
I wouldn't be surprised if he trade all the picks for him and he just gets totaled on arrival. Antonio McDyess style. Or maybe just give us 1 good year and become our new Amar'e.
I think Embiid is older than 30...
Fat Kat wrote:


KnicksGadfly wrote:Josh Hart had one of the most impactful 0-7 score lines I’ve ever seen.
Embiid hurt Mitch and then had to deal with Precious and OG. Plus they played him 44 minutes and they still lost.
Give Brunson his props. Got too much hate after two games.
Finish them off at home.

3toheadmelo wrote:i don't see philly asking for randle but if they did for embiid, i would do it. a core of brunson/og/embiid would win a ring. one of the few guys i would be fine with trading randle away for.
sol537 wrote:7-man rotation makes us better but no more margin for error… hopefully Mitch and Bogs can get healthy and we close them out in 5.
Wolfgang630 wrote:There’s a pathway to the ECF

3toheadmelo wrote:i don't see philly asking for randle but if they did for embiid, i would do it. a core of brunson/og/embiid would win a ring. one of the few guys i would be fine with trading randle away for.