ImageImageImageImageImage

Randle's Future

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

What would you do with Randle?

Poll ended at Sun Aug 4, 2024 1:01 pm

Keep him for this season, then let him walk
11
12%
Extend him now (Aug 3 deadline)
53
57%
Trade him now (add details in comments)
16
17%
Other (please put in comments)
13
14%
 
Total votes: 93

Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,178
And1: 3,129
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#461 » by Nazrmohamed » Tue Aug 27, 2024 2:21 am

Iron Mantis wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
MadGrinch wrote:trade him now for a 4 & 5

with the depth the team has they really only need defense and shooting .

trade ideas

randle for Avdija and robert williams

randle for ayton who believes he’s capable of playing 4 and did it in his 2nd season

randle for jonathan isaac and wendell carter

y’all on a mission to make us worse…

Randle for Ayton doesn't make us worse. He's a very good player, still has upside, and is youthy.

That would slide OG to the 4 and give us a more modern lineup to take out the Celtics.


You must mean Josh Hart because OG isn't a 4. Neither is Josh Hart but at least he'll rebound. And before you get started go look at what we did while Julius was out. When given the chance we kept OG at SF and played Hart at the 4. That's why before you go making your Julius trades you better figure out how we get true PF production at the 4.

Now with that said, there are certain situations where who gives a damn. And that would be if that C were a world beater C. Can Ayton be that guy? Offensively he's got the potential but he can't defend a wet paper bag. Idk. For a guy like Embiid I'd say it don't matter.
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,451
And1: 28,282
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#462 » by Iron Mantis » Tue Aug 27, 2024 3:41 am

Nazrmohamed wrote:
Iron Mantis wrote:
DaGawd wrote:y’all on a mission to make us worse…

Randle for Ayton doesn't make us worse. He's a very good player, still has upside, and is youthy.

That would slide OG to the 4 and give us a more modern lineup to take out the Celtics.


You must mean Josh Hart because OG isn't a 4. Neither is Josh Hart but at least he'll rebound. And before you get started go look at what we did while Julius was out. When given the chance we kept OG at SF and played Hart at the 4. That's why before you go making your Julius trades you better figure out how we get true PF production at the 4.

Now with that said, there are certain situations where who gives a damn. And that would be if that C were a world beater C. Can Ayton be that guy? Offensively he's got the potential but he can't defend a wet paper bag. Idk. For a guy like Embiid I'd say it don't matter.

Meh. Ayton is a top rebounder in the league. He would average a career high in rebounds on the Knicks who will be a top defensive team.

Either way, OG has rebounding ability. See the playoffs.

Yes, you can also put Josh out there at times with Ayton, Mikal, OG, Brunson. That lineup would push the pace on rebounds.

Overall, today's NBA it's more important that your PF is a strong, mobile, and versatile defender as opposed to being a strong rebounder.
Image
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#463 » by Clyde_Style » Tue Aug 27, 2024 4:27 am

Iron Mantis wrote:
Wildcat wrote:
Iron Mantis wrote:He'd share that role with Mikal. "Superstar trade package" Mikal needs to step up and do his thing.

I remember OG claiming he wanted a bigger offensive role as well, but I think that was cap....he just wanted to audition for a contract. With his lucrative extension, he's likely cool with the 3&D role at PF.


Let me just debunk this offensive thing because hack writer took a Nurse quote and ran that **** to ground and other outlets didn't bother to source it out.

This thing came from Nurse at the end of the 21-22 season. OG never said he wanted a bigger role. He said he wanted to be included more in the offense, which translated to having more plays called for him. And that's exactly what Nurse did in the following season. The exact quote was, "He wants to be more a part of the offense, so I certainly can help him with that... but it's kind of a working relationship that he's got to go take some of that."

OG has never said he wanted a bigger offensive role in NY. This offensive thing was just regurgitated from an old quote.


I reject this explanation.

I like mines better and the narrative is more logical.


You need to try that rebuttal the next time you get pulled over for a moving violation.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,200
And1: 96,139
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#464 » by thebuzzardman » Tue Aug 27, 2024 10:24 am

Image
Image
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,451
And1: 28,282
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#465 » by Iron Mantis » Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:07 am

Clyde_Style wrote:
Iron Mantis wrote:
Wildcat wrote:
Let me just debunk this offensive thing because hack writer took a Nurse quote and ran that **** to ground and other outlets didn't bother to source it out.

This thing came from Nurse at the end of the 21-22 season. OG never said he wanted a bigger role. He said he wanted to be included more in the offense, which translated to having more plays called for him. And that's exactly what Nurse did in the following season. The exact quote was, "He wants to be more a part of the offense, so I certainly can help him with that... but it's kind of a working relationship that he's got to go take some of that."

OG has never said he wanted a bigger offensive role in NY. This offensive thing was just regurgitated from an old quote.


I reject this explanation.

I like mines better and the narrative is more logical.


You need to try that rebuttal the next time you get pulled over for a moving violation.

I always do. Works every time. Jedi mind trick style.

Officer: "you know what???? you're right!! :o .. your explanation certainly IS more logical. I'm sorry I pulled you over, good citizen.. in fact, I'll write MYSELF a ticket now. Have a good day, sir"
Image
User avatar
Guano
RealGM
Posts: 39,504
And1: 66,824
Joined: Dec 16, 2010
Location: any port

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#466 » by Guano » Tue Aug 27, 2024 2:34 pm

KnicksGadfly wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:Yet Randle has been All NBA twice in the past 4 years. Meaning he was top 15 by the end of two seasons and had he played enougg gsmes was going to be All NBA again.

Randle isn't the problem. How people perceive Randle is the problem.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


Several issues.
1 - All NBA is a regular season award.
2- NBA is voted by media members.
3 - All NBA is not a top 15 player ranking. That’s an NYKMentality type of argument. That's because All NBA is also affected by injuries and opportunity, and in the past, things like positional designations, and the fact that players have some incentive to stat pad because it affects future salaries (Tyrese Haliburton). I even trust the General Board top rankings more if we want to do the top players of the NBA.

Randle won an All NBA in 22-23. Does that mean he was better than Brunson that season? Even if people didn't see it in the regular season, anyone who watched the playoffs that season could have told you that Brunson was much better, even without the All NBA. Similarly, Brunson didn’t need the validation of an All NBA this year to prove he was better than Randle. He already was. Period.

What it does tell us, though, is that he was very productive in the regular season. Not all players can do that. But that's not the bar for top 15. To be honest, if we're debating Randle's place on the top 50 rankings, we need to move beyond the regular season. That should be the bottom line at most for all the guys on the top 50 - they shouldn't need to prove themselves in the regular season and most of them should already be getting paid big bucks because of that. A lot of those guys should be playing for reputation, legacy, playoff victories, and more.

The good thing, though, is that Randle can really change how people perceive him. It's all in his control. I've always said that he had way more to give, and only himself to blame. There's no reason this board should be this divided on him. We should all be lining up behind him, like we do with Brunson, but Randle needs to change how he's perceived through action to make that happen.


how do you invalidate your whole point then proceed to write a couple paragraphs :noway:
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,802
And1: 19,363
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#467 » by KnicksGadfly » Tue Aug 27, 2024 2:52 pm

Guano wrote:
KnicksGadfly wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:Yet Randle has been All NBA twice in the past 4 years. Meaning he was top 15 by the end of two seasons and had he played enougg gsmes was going to be All NBA again.

Randle isn't the problem. How people perceive Randle is the problem.

Sent from my SM-S9080 using RealGM mobile app


Several issues.
1 - All NBA is a regular season award.
2- NBA is voted by media members.
3 - All NBA is not a top 15 player ranking. That’s an NYKMentality type of argument. That's because All NBA is also affected by injuries and opportunity, and in the past, things like positional designations, and the fact that players have some incentive to stat pad because it affects future salaries (Tyrese Haliburton). I even trust the General Board top rankings more if we want to do the top players of the NBA.

Randle won an All NBA in 22-23. Does that mean he was better than Brunson that season? Even if people didn't see it in the regular season, anyone who watched the playoffs that season could have told you that Brunson was much better, even without the All NBA. Similarly, Brunson didn’t need the validation of an All NBA this year to prove he was better than Randle. He already was. Period.

What it does tell us, though, is that he was very productive in the regular season. Not all players can do that. But that's not the bar for top 15. To be honest, if we're debating Randle's place on the top 50 rankings, we need to move beyond the regular season. That should be the bottom line at most for all the guys on the top 50 - they shouldn't need to prove themselves in the regular season and most of them should already be getting paid big bucks because of that. A lot of those guys should be playing for reputation, legacy, playoff victories, and more.

The good thing, though, is that Randle can really change how people perceive him. It's all in his control. I've always said that he had way more to give, and only himself to blame. There's no reason this board should be this divided on him. We should all be lining up behind him, like we do with Brunson, but Randle needs to change how he's perceived through action to make that happen.


how do you invalidate your whole point then proceed to write a couple paragraphs :noway:


lol I don’t know if that was an invalidation, but maybe a bit of an exaggeration.

I do feel arguing with NYKMentality was a bit of a waste, considering the type of arguments he was using. Similarly, I think just using All NBA to support Randle as a “top 15 player”, without the full context, is something he would do. It’s also how he ended up telling us RJ Barrett was gonna be better than Jordan.
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#468 » by aggo » Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:49 pm

stop using popularity awards to support your arguments.


its embarrassing.
aggo
RealGM
Posts: 16,358
And1: 8,481
Joined: Mar 14, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#469 » by aggo » Tue Aug 27, 2024 11:58 pm

the nba players associations shamed voters and literally campaigned publicly for months to ensure Jaylen brown would get voted in as all-nba so that he could qualify for the supermax.

and now

all-nba selections are position less. this is done so that even more players can be selected based on popularity or contract bonuses, whichever is more convenient in the moment for whichever new player.



quite frankly, using all-nba now as an argument is on the same level as unironically chanting "MVP !!" for Julius randle at the garden.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#470 » by Clyde_Style » Wed Aug 28, 2024 1:16 am

KnicksGadfly wrote:I do feel arguing with NYKMentality was a bit of a waste, considering the type of arguments he was using. Similarly, I think just using All NBA to support Randle as a “top 15 player”, without the full context, is something he would do. It’s also how he ended up telling us RJ Barrett was gonna be better than Jordan.


Are you off your rocker? Image
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,257
And1: 25,714
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#471 » by moocow007 » Wed Aug 28, 2024 8:53 pm

Guys still trying to trade Randle for either: a) a young potential superstar or b) a bucket of bolts. You guys never fail to deliver.
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#472 » by Clyde_Style » Thu Aug 29, 2024 12:02 am

This thread will outlive Randle or his future
StlHawksFan
Junior
Posts: 395
And1: 247
Joined: Apr 26, 2024

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#473 » by StlHawksFan » Thu Aug 29, 2024 12:42 am

Nazrmohamed wrote:
Iron Mantis wrote:
DaGawd wrote:y’all on a mission to make us worse…

Randle for Ayton doesn't make us worse. He's a very good player, still has upside, and is youthy.

That would slide OG to the 4 and give us a more modern lineup to take out the Celtics.


You must mean Josh Hart because OG isn't a 4. Neither is Josh Hart but at least he'll rebound. And before you get started go look at what we did while Julius was out. When given the chance we kept OG at SF and played Hart at the 4. That's why before you go making your Julius trades you better figure out how we get true PF production at the 4.

Now with that said, there are certain situations where who gives a damn. And that would be if that C were a world beater C. Can Ayton be that guy? Offensively he's got the potential but he can't defend a wet paper bag. Idk. For a guy like Embiid I'd say it don't matter.


Ayton would drive Thibs crazy
User avatar
GettinitDone
General Manager
Posts: 7,561
And1: 4,668
Joined: Feb 09, 2012

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#474 » by GettinitDone » Thu Aug 29, 2024 5:47 am

Read on Twitter


Strange release but not bad
User avatar
BKlutch
RealGM
Posts: 18,401
And1: 16,573
Joined: Jan 11, 2015
Location: A magical land of rainbows and cotton candy trees where the Knicks D gonna F you up
   

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#475 » by BKlutch » Thu Aug 29, 2024 1:06 pm

GettinitDone wrote:
Read on Twitter


Strange release but not bad

Strange video LOL - had to watch it in the mirror.
.

____________________
____________________


:basketball: _______ M U C K A_________ :basketball:
*Make Us Champion Knicks Again*
:basketball: ** GO NY GO NY GO NY GO! ** :basketball:
____________________
____________________

.
.
User avatar
Synciere
General Manager
Posts: 8,533
And1: 5,640
Joined: Jun 08, 2004
     

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#476 » by Synciere » Fri Aug 30, 2024 10:44 am

GettinitDone wrote:
Read on Twitter


Strange release but not bad


LOL Who asked for that? Were people clamoring for Julius Randle as a righty videos?
User avatar
Wildcat
RealGM
Posts: 14,936
And1: 4,722
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Astoria, NY
 

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#477 » by Wildcat » Fri Aug 30, 2024 1:58 pm

Synciere wrote:
GettinitDone wrote:
Read on Twitter


Strange release but not bad


LOL Who asked for that? Were people clamoring for Julius Randle as a righty videos?


Up next: What if Julius was Molasses: A Slow-mo Cut. Followed by What if Julius Played in Reverse to complete the trilogy.
User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 38,845
And1: 51,867
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#478 » by DaGawd » Fri Aug 30, 2024 4:37 pm

GettinitDone wrote:
Read on Twitter


Strange release but not bad

crazy the difference in handedness can make a player look totally different
BaF
Washington Wizards
User avatar
Iron Mantis
RealGM
Posts: 27,451
And1: 28,282
Joined: Aug 12, 2006

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#479 » by Iron Mantis » Fri Aug 30, 2024 5:07 pm

I don't give a hobo's hat about a right, under, or middle-handed Randle.

If I don't get some meaningful New York Knicks news soon I'm going to lose it.

Any new Tweets of our guys with some scrimmage or pickup game footage? Throw me somethin'... I'm desperate...

Image
Image
Clyde_Style
RealGM
Posts: 71,855
And1: 69,930
Joined: Jul 12, 2009

Re: Randle's Future 

Post#480 » by Clyde_Style » Fri Aug 30, 2024 10:31 pm

Iron Mantis wrote:I don't give a hobo's hat about a right, under, or middle-handed Randle.

If I don't get some meaningful New York Knicks news soon I'm going to lose it.

Any new Tweets of our guys with some scrimmage or pickup game footage? Throw me somethin'... I'm desperate...

Image


TWEET:

Knicks Front Office Announces Plans to Use
Regenerative DNA and Random Body Parts to
Reanimate Baren Davids in Bid to Create
Deepest Contending Roster in the NBA


Image

Return to New York Knicks