god shammgod wrote:god damn does this team suck without the big 3 though. but with them they're unbeatable. i don't know if this convinces me to go big 3 or not.
GS has had great role players so either way you'd still need high level role players
Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
god shammgod wrote:god damn does this team suck without the big 3 though. but with them they're unbeatable. i don't know if this convinces me to go big 3 or not.
nyknicks8016 wrote:Refs absolutely horrible this gamrle, missing obvious calls then making a bunch of questionable calls. Rewarding lowry flopping all game.
Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:god damn does this team suck without the big 3 though. but with them they're unbeatable. i don't know if this convinces me to go big 3 or not.
GS has had great role players so either way you'd still need high level role players

SelbyCobra wrote:Man, the Raptors have gotten a crazy amount of...not luck...I don't want to imply that because they've been working hard. Maybe "bounces"? There have been a metric ton of bounces go Toronto's way tonight, and combined with them shooting well and the Warriors missing Klay/Kevan, the game is where it is.
But yeah, a lot of out of bounds, loose balls, offensive rebounds were in favor of the Raptors. I'm curious how the Warriors look if it levels out in Game 4.
god shammgod wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:god damn does this team suck without the big 3 though. but with them they're unbeatable. i don't know if this convinces me to go big 3 or not.
GS has had great role players so either way you'd still need high level role players
not this year they don't
Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
GS has had great role players so either way you'd still need high level role players
not this year they don't
Well Iggy and Livingston are probably at the end of their careers and they are not scrubs, but you're right this year GS is not deep
TO however has enough depth and is throwing guys at GS with aggression and wearing on them. It's going to be tough for GS to handle TO's physical D without Klay to space the floor with Curry
god shammgod wrote:SelbyCobra wrote:Man, the Raptors have gotten a crazy amount of...not luck...I don't want to imply that because they've been working hard. Maybe "bounces"? There have been a metric ton of bounces go Toronto's way tonight, and combined with them shooting well and the Warriors missing Klay/Kevan, the game is where it is.
But yeah, a lot of out of bounds, loose balls, offensive rebounds were in favor of the Raptors. I'm curious how the Warriors look if it levels out in Game 4.
it depends who's back or not for the warriors. curry played as best as he could. i don't even know he can do this again, 50 point games in the finals don't happen often.


robillionaire wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:
not this year they don't
Well Iggy and Livingston are probably at the end of their careers and they are not scrubs, but you're right this year GS is not deep
TO however has enough depth and is throwing guys at GS with aggression and wearing on them. It's going to be tough for GS to handle TO's physical D without Klay to space the floor with Curry
toronto essentially played a 7 man lineup with ibaka and vanvleet being the 2 getting minutes off the bench, powell played 6 minutes nobody else really played. GSW played the deeper lineup, even with KD and Klay out they had significantly more minutes off the bench
god shammgod wrote:this will solve itself. drake gonna be busy pouting when the raptors are getting that ass waxed. imagine the warriors losing a game because they had problems containing fred vanvleet. as if.
"drug dealing aside, ghostwriting aside, let's have a heart to heart about losing in 5"


robillionaire wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:god shammgod wrote:
not this year they don't
Well Iggy and Livingston are probably at the end of their careers and they are not scrubs, but you're right this year GS is not deep
TO however has enough depth and is throwing guys at GS with aggression and wearing on them. It's going to be tough for GS to handle TO's physical D without Klay to space the floor with Curry
toronto essentially played a 7 man lineup with ibaka and vanvleet being the 2 getting minutes off the bench, powell played 6 minutes nobody else really played. GSW played the deeper lineup, even with KD and Klay out they had significantly more minutes off the bench
Clyde_Style wrote:robillionaire wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:
Well Iggy and Livingston are probably at the end of their careers and they are not scrubs, but you're right this year GS is not deep
TO however has enough depth and is throwing guys at GS with aggression and wearing on them. It's going to be tough for GS to handle TO's physical D without Klay to space the floor with Curry
toronto essentially played a 7 man lineup with ibaka and vanvleet being the 2 getting minutes off the bench, powell played 6 minutes nobody else really played. GSW played the deeper lineup, even with KD and Klay out they had significantly more minutes off the bench
And 7 guys playing well is a lot more than GS can say for themselves tonight
robillionaire wrote:Clyde_Style wrote:robillionaire wrote:
toronto essentially played a 7 man lineup with ibaka and vanvleet being the 2 getting minutes off the bench, powell played 6 minutes nobody else really played. GSW played the deeper lineup, even with KD and Klay out they had significantly more minutes off the bench
And 7 guys playing well is a lot more than GS can say for themselves tonight
true but my point being the raptors are riding the wheels off their starters and essentially played only 2 dudes off the bench, they aren't playing a crazy deep lineup or anything
SelbyCobra wrote:god shammgod wrote:this will solve itself. drake gonna be busy pouting when the raptors are getting that ass waxed. imagine the warriors losing a game because they had problems containing fred vanvleet. as if.
"drug dealing aside, ghostwriting aside, let's have a heart to heart about losing in 5"
Front page of ESPN.
YOU DID THIS.
