HarthorneWingo wrote:jvsimonetti0514 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
Lonzo played even worse against us during the season than Huerter did in the playoffs. And we saw what Huerter did to the Sixers in their series. Huerter can get to the rim too. Maybe the Hawks will be forced to trade him this off season or before the deadline next season for cap reasons?
I get that part of Lonzo being a secondary facilitator, outside shooter, and defender. Frank can fill that role and do so at a much cheaper cost. Frank was close to 90th percentile on catch and shoot 3s. We know he can play defense, even better than Lonzo.
Huerter is averaging 11.6 ppg in the playoffs on slightly better percentages during the regular season. This is who this kid is and that's a solid role player, I don't think we should overreact for a couple good games in the playoffs. If you look at his career numbers they're pretty much the same from Huerter first year with slight improvements in efficiency. Lonzo has made dramatic improvements with his efficiency and scoring. I mean that's how we ended up signing Jerome James to some crazy contract cuz of an overreaction to some playoff games. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't hate bringing in Huerter if the price was right but Idk if I see as much upside there as I do in Lonzo.
Frank can't fill that role cuz Frank isn't an NBA player and playing him more would not make us a better offensive team. Marci had a bunch of advanced stats showing the Lonzo made his team better. Frank's not even an upgrade for Bullock. If he was, Thibs would have played him in the rotation instead of being situational. We need to try to upgrade our startling line up, not make it worse.
Lonzo vs. Knicks
'20-'21:
- 27+ minutes, TS% .278 (lowest of all starters), 2-9 FGs (22%), 1-5 3P FGs (20%), 3 assists.
yes and? Why should those three games be weighed over the other 68?