ImageImageImageImageImage

Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

jvsimonetti0514
General Manager
Posts: 9,458
And1: 9,675
Joined: Dec 22, 2015
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#521 » by jvsimonetti0514 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:54 pm

HarthorneWingo wrote:
jvsimonetti0514 wrote:
HarthorneWingo wrote:
Lonzo played even worse against us during the season than Huerter did in the playoffs. And we saw what Huerter did to the Sixers in their series. Huerter can get to the rim too. Maybe the Hawks will be forced to trade him this off season or before the deadline next season for cap reasons?

I get that part of Lonzo being a secondary facilitator, outside shooter, and defender. Frank can fill that role and do so at a much cheaper cost. Frank was close to 90th percentile on catch and shoot 3s. We know he can play defense, even better than Lonzo.


Huerter is averaging 11.6 ppg in the playoffs on slightly better percentages during the regular season. This is who this kid is and that's a solid role player, I don't think we should overreact for a couple good games in the playoffs. If you look at his career numbers they're pretty much the same from Huerter first year with slight improvements in efficiency. Lonzo has made dramatic improvements with his efficiency and scoring. I mean that's how we ended up signing Jerome James to some crazy contract cuz of an overreaction to some playoff games. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't hate bringing in Huerter if the price was right but Idk if I see as much upside there as I do in Lonzo.

Frank can't fill that role cuz Frank isn't an NBA player and playing him more would not make us a better offensive team. Marci had a bunch of advanced stats showing the Lonzo made his team better. Frank's not even an upgrade for Bullock. If he was, Thibs would have played him in the rotation instead of being situational. We need to try to upgrade our startling line up, not make it worse.


Lonzo vs. Knicks

'20-'21:

- 27+ minutes, TS% .278 (lowest of all starters), 2-9 FGs (22%), 1-5 3P FGs (20%), 3 assists.


yes and? Why should those three games be weighed over the other 68?
I'm apart of a Knicks podcast! You Should check it out!
youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWW9GUVpNULS97PyptXXU4w
Knicksfan1992
RealGM
Posts: 14,081
And1: 14,565
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
         

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#522 » by Knicksfan1992 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:01 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Deeeez Knicks wrote:
If we are being serious, its our best backcourt in years with Rose/Quickley off the bench. It's hard to go from worst backcourt to a top backcourt. Sometimes you gotta upgrade more slowly. Else, we will end up with Payton again.


Also you can start IQ with those guys.. RJ and Lonzo both are big enough to handle most wings in the league.

Quickley can add the more dynamic punch. People, in general, on this forum are sleeping on Quickley's offensive potential.


Lonzo
IQ
RJ
Randle
Mitch

Who, besides no one, except maybe Randle, can create and make a layup, in that lineup?


IQ actually drives at a pretty good rate. The question with him is more decision making based when he drives. He tends to avoid going for contact layups and put up inefficient floaters or make some questionable passing decisions RJ and Randle both drive to the hoop over 10 times a game. Same with Rose. IQ is at 6, but if you prorate his minutes out to starter minutes he would be close to that amount too.

At some point, this comes down to the Knicks development staff actually doing their jobs for once :lol: We need RJ to start converting more of his layups. Quickley to continue to improve in all facets and Randle to learn from the playoffs and come back an even more efficient and smarter player next year than he was this year.

I feel like a lot of the board has PTSD and is basically discounting our young guys getting better because they seemingly never do lol. But I'm actually fairly confident that we have a competent development staff in place and I think that showed this year with the jumps players made throughout the roster. That's why i'm more inclined to take a shot on Lonzo than maybe other people are
Knicksfan1992
RealGM
Posts: 14,081
And1: 14,565
Joined: Jun 14, 2012
         

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#523 » by Knicksfan1992 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:02 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Also you can start IQ with those guys.. RJ and Lonzo both are big enough to handle most wings in the league.

Quickley can add the more dynamic punch. People, in general, on this forum are sleeping on Quickley's offensive potential.


Lonzo
IQ
RJ
Randle
Mitch

Who, besides no one, except maybe Randle, can create and make a layup, in that lineup?

That line-up would be a disaster waiting to happen.


You're subbing out Bullock and IQ for upgrades and better shooting. It's not a disaster in the least bit.

Swap IQ with Elf and our starting lineup killed teams this year
User avatar
Besart19
RealGM
Posts: 13,765
And1: 5,040
Joined: Feb 12, 2012
Location: Dibra, Albania
   

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#524 » by Besart19 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:17 pm

Quickley / Rose / Vildoza
Oladipo / Burks / Ntilikina
Leonard / Bullock / Knox
Randle / Toppin / Anthony
Robinson / Gasol / Gibson
Strength and Honour!
User avatar
phuqtup1
Freshman
Posts: 73
And1: 38
Joined: Jan 24, 2018
       

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#525 » by phuqtup1 » Mon Jun 21, 2021 10:31 pm

Why the hell anyone on this board would want Simmons(trainwreck)33, 35, 37 and 40 million due the next 4 years. Some people on this board need professional help.
VirginiaKnickFan
RealGM
Posts: 12,612
And1: 3,547
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Location: Virginia

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#526 » by VirginiaKnickFan » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:26 pm

Besart19 wrote:Quickley / Rose / Vildoza
Oladipo / Burks / Ntilikina
Leonard / Bullock / Knox
Randle / Toppin / Anthony
Robinson / Gasol / Gibson


Leonard? Not happening.
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,373
And1: 95,049
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#527 » by thebuzzardman » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:37 pm

Knicksfan1992 wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Also you can start IQ with those guys.. RJ and Lonzo both are big enough to handle most wings in the league.

Quickley can add the more dynamic punch. People, in general, on this forum are sleeping on Quickley's offensive potential.


Lonzo
IQ
RJ
Randle
Mitch

Who, besides no one, except maybe Randle, can create and make a layup, in that lineup?


IQ actually drives at a pretty good rate. The question with him is more decision making based when he drives. He tends to avoid going for contact layups and put up inefficient floaters or make some questionable passing decisions RJ and Randle both drive to the hoop over 10 times a game. Same with Rose. IQ is at 6, but if you prorate his minutes out to starter minutes he would be close to that amount too.

At some point, this comes down to the Knicks development staff actually doing their jobs for once :lol: We need RJ to start converting more of his layups. Quickley to continue to improve in all facets and Randle to learn from the playoffs and come back an even more efficient and smarter player next year than he was this year.

I feel like a lot of the board has PTSD and is basically discounting our young guys getting better because they seemingly never do lol. But I'm actually fairly confident that we have a competent development staff in place and I think that showed this year with the jumps players made throughout the roster. That's why i'm more inclined to take a shot on Lonzo than maybe other people are


IQ stopped hitting floaters about halfway through the season when he got scouted.
His layups remind me of Greg Anthony and that's not a good thing.

He's a good player. He's really nice IF there is some wing on the team who can drive the ball whenever they want, not RJ who needs a screen and/or an obvious bad player on him.

It's a big "if" if IQ gets better or RJ does. They both seem to have the work ethic to do so, so I'd bet on it. I think I'd want them both to benefit from having a guy who can break down the defense 48 mpg for them (Rose + ? = 48 minutes) so they don't have their confidence shattered by defenses taking away the couple of things they do well right now.
Image
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#528 » by WargamesX » Mon Jun 21, 2021 11:55 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
rickxdel wrote:
Adelheid wrote:Dinwiddie decline PO, does the Knicks go after him?


I think Knicks need to strongly consider going after him. He will be cheaper than Lonzo and Spencer is a dynamic scoring threat and can actually run some plays in the half court whereas Lonzo is best in transition, which in the playoffs doesn't matter as much.


I don't like him, but at least he'll attempt layups. With Ball, it's more a wish.

Ball + Lavine though, I'd be for.

I think that is what the bulls are going to do

Coby White for Ball works pretty well. If the Pelicans pull that trade even with Coby injured Chicago would look like.

Ball
Lavine
Pat Will
Young
Vucevic

Is still a bit ugly on paper but I think they’ll mesh and do better this year. They should be able to hide Zach defensively most possessions and let him and Vucevic focus on scoring.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
Deeeez Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 49,239
And1: 55,141
Joined: Nov 12, 2004

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#529 » by Deeeez Knicks » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:00 am

thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Also you can start IQ with those guys.. RJ and Lonzo both are big enough to handle most wings in the league.

Quickley can add the more dynamic punch. People, in general, on this forum are sleeping on Quickley's offensive potential.


Lonzo
IQ
RJ
Randle
Mitch

Who, besides no one, except maybe Randle, can create and make a layup, in that lineup?


Lonzo, IQ, RJ, Rose can do a little bit of everything combined. It's not winning a title but its an upgrade and we still have a lot of room to keep improving the roster.

But if you look at the Hawks, Bucks, Sixers...how many guys on those teams are great at creating offense? Basically its Trae, Embiid, and Giannis...Middlton, Jrue a little bit. By defintion of a lot of people those guys arent even good enough either to be guys creating offnese. Atl is led by Trae, but it also helps that they have a bunch of good, solid, quality non-star players that all fit a role. Players like Lonzo who would fit in to exactly the type of players they brought in to help. Sometimes those players add up.

People are just getting carried away with players that can create or bust mentality. Now of course if it comes down to it give me a star over a role player like Ball. But you still need players like Ball and the good ones get underrated. We don't want Mikal, we don't want Haliburton, we dont want Middleton, Jrue...but then these guys end up being critical pieces to there teams. Sometimes you can't always build a team with 3 superstars and bums. Its not always that easy. Sometimes you just got to keep adding quality players when you can even if they dont solve all our problems.

Basically we need $100, and we find a $20 bill you take the $20 and hope to find the rest later.
Mavs
C: Horford | Goga | Paul Reed |
PF: Lauri Markkanen | Randle | Tucker
SF: Trey Murphy | Trent | Anderson | Simone
SG: Vassell | Trent | Livingston
PG: Spida | Mann | Deuce
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,373
And1: 95,049
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#530 » by thebuzzardman » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:05 am

Deeeez Knicks wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicksfan1992 wrote:
Also you can start IQ with those guys.. RJ and Lonzo both are big enough to handle most wings in the league.

Quickley can add the more dynamic punch. People, in general, on this forum are sleeping on Quickley's offensive potential.


Lonzo
IQ
RJ
Randle
Mitch

Who, besides no one, except maybe Randle, can create and make a layup, in that lineup?


Lonzo, IQ, RJ, Rose can do a little bit of everything combined. It's not winning a title but its an upgrade and we still have a lot of room to keep improving the roster.

But if you look at the Hawks, Bucks, Sixers...how many guys on those teams are great at creating offense? Basically its Trae, Embiid, and Giannis...Middlton, Jrue a little bit. By defintion of a lot of people those guys arent even good enough either to be guys creating offnese. Atl is led by Trae, but it also helps that they have a bunch of good, solid, quality non-star players that all fit a role. Players like Lonzo who would fit in to exactly the type of players they brought in to help. Sometimes those players add up.

People are just getting carried away with players that can create or bust mentality. Now of course if it comes down to it give me a star over a role player like Ball. But you still need players like Ball and the good ones get underrated. We don't want Mikal, we don't want Haliburton, we dont want Middleton, Jrue...but then these guys end up being critical pieces to there teams. Sometimes you can't always build a team with 3 superstars and bums. Its not always that easy. Sometimes you just got to keep adding quality players when you can even if they dont solve all our problems.

Basically we need $100, and we find a $20 bill you take the $20 and hope to find the rest later.


I've said plenty of times I don't mind Lonzo. As long as it's:
a) To take Bullocks spot and then a place holder PG who doesn't completely suck is signed to split the 48 with Rose
or
b)The Knicks have some WWW info completely knowing they'll get a wing who can create to put alongside RJ/Ball

If the Knicks walk away this offseason signing Ball, but not upgrading PG or wing in terms of another player who can penetrate, then the team is only slightly better than the current version - maybe. And I don't think the Knicks were really a 4th seed, more a bubble 8th seed that got somewhat lucky.

They'll have to do better than just Ball. Nothing wrong with him, but alone, it's not enough. And then next year Randle asks for the supermax.

*edit - I'm not scoffing at Ball. I think he helps most any team. I wanted Haliburton etc - I know you are addressing the board. I'm just wondering if Ball is the best fit, if that's the only place the money is going to go.
Image
User avatar
newyorker4ever
RealGM
Posts: 10,412
And1: 4,671
Joined: Jan 03, 2012
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#531 » by newyorker4ever » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:24 am

ADeP7 wrote:Norman Powell is the move. And move up for a guard in the draft.
Bring back rose and bullock off the bench

Giddey/ rose / Luca
Barrett/quick
Powell/ bullock
Randle / toppin
Mitch / Noel ?

Kick the cap can down to 22 with Beal lavine and maybe some other RFA


I'm definitely down with N.Powell and Giddey but if not Giddey then Davion Mitchell or N.Hyland/J.Butler/T.Mann. I'm also a big M.McBride fan.
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,138
And1: 11,822
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#532 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:37 am

WargamesX wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
rickxdel wrote:
I think Knicks need to strongly consider going after him. He will be cheaper than Lonzo and Spencer is a dynamic scoring threat and can actually run some plays in the half court whereas Lonzo is best in transition, which in the playoffs doesn't matter as much.


I don't like him, but at least he'll attempt layups. With Ball, it's more a wish.

Ball + Lavine though, I'd be for.

I think that is what the bulls are going to do

Coby White for Ball works pretty well. If the Pelicans pull that trade even with Coby injured Chicago would look like.

Ball
Lavine
Pat Will
Young
Vucevic

Is still a bit ugly on paper but I think they’ll mesh and do better this year. They should be able to hide Zach defensively most possessions and let him and Vucevic focus on scoring.


I think we bring Theis back or sign someone else. Young is not a starter and falls apart if he plays more than 24 minutes.
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,873
And1: 35,585
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#533 » by Fat Kat » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:46 am

Prepare yourself for an Eric Bledsoe + picks salary dump.
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#534 » by WargamesX » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:47 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
I don't like him, but at least he'll attempt layups. With Ball, it's more a wish.

Ball + Lavine though, I'd be for.

I think that is what the bulls are going to do

Coby White for Ball works pretty well. If the Pelicans pull that trade even with Coby injured Chicago would look like.

Ball
Lavine
Pat Will
Young
Vucevic

Is still a bit ugly on paper but I think they’ll mesh and do better this year. They should be able to hide Zach defensively most possessions and let him and Vucevic focus on scoring.


I think we bring Theis back or sign someone else. Young is not a starter and falls apart if he plays more than 24 minutes.

Fair enough, I still think you guys do better than you look on paper.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,138
And1: 11,822
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#535 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:51 am

WargamesX wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
WargamesX wrote:I think that is what the bulls are going to do

Coby White for Ball works pretty well. If the Pelicans pull that trade even with Coby injured Chicago would look like.

Ball
Lavine
Pat Will
Young
Vucevic

Is still a bit ugly on paper but I think they’ll mesh and do better this year. They should be able to hide Zach defensively most possessions and let him and Vucevic focus on scoring.


I think we bring Theis back or sign someone else. Young is not a starter and falls apart if he plays more than 24 minutes.

Fair enough, I still think you guys do better than you look on paper.


My expectation is be .500 or better. I think it is doable if they make good moves this off-season and stay healthy. Coby White not being able to train all off-season with the labrum tear makes me think we have to go hard for a starting PG.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#536 » by WargamesX » Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:57 am

WindyCityBorn wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
I think we bring Theis back or sign someone else. Young is not a starter and falls apart if he plays more than 24 minutes.

Fair enough, I still think you guys do better than you look on paper.


My expectation is be .500 or better. I think it is doable if they make good moves this off-season and stay healthy. Coby White not being able to train all off-season with the labrum tear makes me think we have to go hard for a starting PG.


Before that tear I was pretty sure ya’ll were going to trade him for Lonzo, but I am not sure Griffin pulls the trigger now. Coby will be back in December right? If the Pelicans have another slow start they might fire him. The best move would be for you guys to keep your pick
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
WindyCityBorn
RealGM
Posts: 22,138
And1: 11,822
Joined: Jun 26, 2014
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#537 » by WindyCityBorn » Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:03 am

WargamesX wrote:
WindyCityBorn wrote:
WargamesX wrote:Fair enough, I still think you guys do better than you look on paper.


My expectation is be .500 or better. I think it is doable if they make good moves this off-season and stay healthy. Coby White not being able to train all off-season with the labrum tear makes me think we have to go hard for a starting PG.


Before that tear I was pretty sure ya’ll were going to trade him for Lonzo, but I am not sure Griffin pulls the trigger now. Coby will be back in December right? If the Pelicans have another slow start they might fire him. The best move would be for you guys to keep your pick


4 to 6 months so he could be back for the start season. Just sucks he won’t be able to work on his game at all. Of course keeping the pick would change everything.
snadler
General Manager
Posts: 7,527
And1: 8,362
Joined: Feb 16, 2009

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#538 » by snadler » Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:05 am

Ball is the perfect settled for guard, he’s an improvement for sure but pretty much anyone would be, he’s not moving the needle for the knicks, but so many fans have been beaten down by past failures they are ok with settling. I’m completely against paying ball 20 plus million a year which is what it will take for him not to return to NO..I’ll pas on the settle candidate..I’d much rather take a shot on a low risk high reward player like dinwiddie
User avatar
KnicksGadfly
RealGM
Posts: 17,650
And1: 19,066
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
   

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#539 » by KnicksGadfly » Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:35 am

Fat Kat wrote:Prepare yourself for an Eric Bledsoe + picks salary dump.


Wouldn’t hate it. Depends on compensation coming back. Wonder if the Knicks would do it for Bledsoe and Ball.
User avatar
Riot Randolph
RealGM
Posts: 10,995
And1: 9,572
Joined: Nov 28, 2011
     

Re: Who will the Knicks Target? Here's a List of REALISTIC Players 

Post#540 » by Riot Randolph » Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:54 am

KnicksGadfly wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:Prepare yourself for an Eric Bledsoe + picks salary dump.


Wouldn’t hate it. Depends on compensation coming back. Wonder if the Knicks would do it for Bledsoe and Ball.

Ball is a rfa...no way am I taking bledsoe for a rfa
Formerly Knicks85

Capn'O wrote:I wonder what Paul Reed's feelings are about metal bats.

Return to New York Knicks