SkyMason21 wrote:WargamesX wrote:It’s crazy to me that the Knicks rather fight to sneak into the playin instead of add talent to a team that still needs it. It stinks of Dolan’s pig faced demands.
The only thing going in their favor is they have such a tough slate of games coming up they might not be able to mess this up.
It will work itself out. For this team to make the play-in with the schedule we have it will take our best players putting it together and finding ways to be effective despite our very obvious PG and wing productivity issues, or some combination of duece, IQ, and Cam fixing them. And would that really be upsetting?
Add in the big pile of not clear upgrades that is this draft class, it makes it hard for me to care. I don't really love any of the PG talent more than I did Duece for us heading into last years draft, and we still got Rokas possibly coming in soon (and somehow he's now arguably as well regarded as any pg prospect in this draft). I'll love it if we can get high enough for Ivey, and I'll probably find a way to be equally excited for w.e. guy we'd get at 12 after getting bounced in the play-in. Unless its Patrick Baldwin

.
Yes, the team needs to draft a PG and I do think guys like Ivey, Dyson, Sharpe, and TyTy are better than what we have on the roster now in the backcourt.. might be gone by pick 10. Also, players like Ivey or Sharpe might drop as well.
For a team that not only needs talents. but has clear holes to fix in its roster and no cap room. With two more weak FA ahead of them as well.
The idea that they will pull off a temporary miracle to get into either a one-game elimination series they could easily lose, or a first round playoff series they will almost lose is abhorrent.
Only 3-4 wins can be the difference between drafting 9th and like 3rd. for example, in 2018 the Knicks won 29 games and took Kevin Knox. In that same draft, the hawks/Mavs won 24 games and took Trae Young and Doncic, respectively.