cgmw wrote:TrueWarrior wrote:Clyde Frazier wrote:Definitely a starting caliber center. We're lucky to have him after Mitch went down! Also love this:
I dont want to keep dunking on Mitch while hes injured (again), but it should be obvious by now that Hartenstein is the better long term option at center. Mitch is good at being Mitch but he should be a back up going forward, or he can get traded if hes not cool with that.
Just think if Hartenstein’s jumper ever becomes decent. There is still more potential with him compared to Mitch. He’s also got some solid moves around the basket with his floaters, hooks, up and unders, etc.
Obvious?
Come on, now. Prisoner of the moment much? Neither Mitch nor Hartenstein will ever make an All-Star team, so you're really just being nasty for nastiness sake to rag on Mitch while he's out. Centers are like running backs. I wouldn't get too attached to either longterm, especially with Thibs running a 7-foot, 250+ lbs center like he's Steph Curry, Reggie Miller or Ray Allen.
As long as Thibs is coach, the FO needs to be agile in providing large bodied rim defenders because Thibs will continue to chew them up and spit them out.
Many numbers, like the above, paint Hartenstein as just as good or even better on defense than Mitch. On offense hes clearly better. To me thats obvious yes.
If Hartenstein can ever become a solid shooter then he has All Star potential. Hes already a great defender, rebounder, passer, and has some moves around the rim. Add a Kurt Thomas/Taj Gibson/David Lee jumper, like many players have developed and Hartenstein himself has shown flashes of, then he can be a very good all around starting center. Hes not just some random rim runner. You’re underrating him.