mpharris36 wrote:GONYK wrote:mpharris36 wrote:
I get what your saying but you don't consider that damning on the coach?
It certainly will be if it doesn't work.
Your basically saying he has be intentionally hurting our defense for over 4 months now because he is waiting on one injury prone player to return and hopefully change our defense. Which most recent metrics suggest Mitch will help nominally but not overhaul our defense either. He also is going to be handled with kid cloves probably...do you ever see mitch playing over 20 minutes in a game this year? Probably not.
That's not exactly what I'm saying. I'm saying his defensive system is what it is and he doesn't really want to have to half-ass one version of it for 70% of the season when he had a good feeling he was getting his defensive anchor back and will want to play a certain way in the playoffs.
The argument that he's hurting our defense or overall performance is speculative, at best, given our record.
I don't know that is like saying an NFL drafted a top mobile QB and a coach is so stubborn he refuses to adapt and run more RPO's and bootlegs to get him outside the pocket. Top tier coaches adj there scheme to there personnel.
Is this hypothetical coach producing a top 5 team in the league?
And we are top 5 in the league simply because of our talent. We are 20th in DEF which is pretty damning if you ask me. Especially if he knows KAT isn't good at drop but continues to run it because he hopes that Mitch will come back after over 4 months off and save the day?
This remains to be seen. Like I said, it's the bet he wants to make. What is clear is that he has no interest in optimizing for the regular season. He wants to optimize for what he wants to do in the playoffs.
I guess my overall response to your responses is you are satisfied where we are at. I think the record is good but overall the disappointing performances against the top teams is the cloud over the season right now. Because at the end of the day...the moves we made weren't made to win a round in the playoffs...I guess so projection is involved with my concern because we will have to play CLE or BOS in round 2 if we make it that far...and if we have a poor showing (like in the regular season) do you think they move off him. I'm not even saying we have to beat CLE or BOS in a series...this is the first year but we need to be way more competitive in a series. If we aren't...I don't see anyway you can bring him back especially if we continue to get exposed on the defensive end and don't try to adj the scheme.
Well, there's sort of three questions/inferences here. I'll answer them as I see them:
1. Am I satisfied with this season?: Overall yes, but I wasn't expecting a title this year. I saw this year as information gathering now that we went from a Volvo to a Jaguar. I think the feedback is pretty clear where we stand.
2. Does the gap between us and the top 3 teams in the league concern me?: For this season...no. But I do think seeing what we're capable of with Mitch is important because, sink or swim, a playing Mitch is our most tradeable asset. We need to know if we keep him, need to trade for a younger/healthier version of him, or if we don't need him at all and should reinvest his salary slot into a different archetype of player. It's all part of the process.
3. Do I think Thibs should and will be fired if we get blown out by CLE/BOS in the 2nd round?: Depends. If we play Mitch and play his defense at full strength and still get crushed, then yes, he should be fired. Mainly because that proves that we need to maximize KAT at the 5 and need to get a coach who can do that.
Will he get fired? I don't know. They may give him a chance into the new season to see if he can adapt. Depends on who is available, TBH.