ImageImageImageImageImage

Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd

Moderators: HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi

ophdog
Rookie
Posts: 1,086
And1: 764
Joined: May 03, 2010

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#541 » by ophdog » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:00 am

GONYK wrote:
ophdog wrote:
GONYK wrote:Yes, you expressing this sentiment every 2 mins in every thread has made that clear.


I’m sorry for honest engagement from a 40 year fan and 15 year participant here. I’m giving my honest thoughts and venting. I thought this was the place for that. Good to hear shade from a forum mod for using this for its intended purpose


It's not engagement. It's screaming basically the same post into every void you can find.

It's a rough night for everyone but this isn't the way to use this forum.


Ok won’t use it no problem
ophdog
Rookie
Posts: 1,086
And1: 764
Joined: May 03, 2010

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#542 » by ophdog » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:04 am

GONYK wrote:
ophdog wrote:
GONYK wrote:Yes, you expressing this sentiment every 2 mins in every thread has made that clear.


I’m sorry for honest engagement from a 40 year fan and 15 year participant here. I’m giving my honest thoughts and venting. I thought this was the place for that. Good to hear shade from a forum mod for using this for its intended purpose


It's not engagement. It's screaming basically the same post into every void you can find.

It's a rough night for everyone but this isn't the way to use this forum.


Deleting now your as soft as KAT
User avatar
GONYK
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 66,887
And1: 45,500
Joined: Jun 27, 2003
Location: Brunson Gang
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#543 » by GONYK » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:05 am

ophdog wrote:
GONYK wrote:
ophdog wrote:
I’m sorry for honest engagement from a 40 year fan and 15 year participant here. I’m giving my honest thoughts and venting. I thought this was the place for that. Good to hear shade from a forum mod for using this for its intended purpose


It's not engagement. It's screaming basically the same post into every void you can find.

It's a rough night for everyone but this isn't the way to use this forum.


Deleting now your as soft as KAT


Night night
B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,562
And1: 6,397
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#544 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:23 am

WargamesX wrote:
JayTWill wrote:Wasn't really a huge fan of the team they put together but I would give them another year before making any major changes. Personally I would look to flip Mitch in a package for another big wing/4 to move OG down to the 3 and Hart to the bench and maybe look for another ball handler for the 2nd unit.

Mitch has been solid since his return but he is entering the last year of his deal and i'm not sure I would want to extend an injury prone big heading towards 30 years old. Rim runner types can lose their usefulness as their athleticism declines.


He might be the best defensive center in the league. He did things these playoffs no other center is doing defensively. Trading him for KAT to be the permanent replacement at Center seems like a mistake.

Well it's obviously him or Rudy.

I mean I'm high on Hukporti's potential. But I don't see the Knicks trading Mitch and not picking up a centre to block Huk's development if Thibs is still the coach.

Again, my question is what can you get as a big wing/4 for under $13m?

And, backtracking, yes Lonzo is theoretically interesting. But what faith does one have in his durability?
JayTWill
Starter
Posts: 2,433
And1: 1,611
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#545 » by JayTWill » Sun Jun 1, 2025 6:43 am

B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
JayTWill wrote:Wasn't really a huge fan of the team they put together but I would give them another year before making any major changes. Personally I would look to flip Mitch in a package for another big wing/4 to move OG down to the 3 and Hart to the bench and maybe look for another ball handler for the 2nd unit.

Mitch has been solid since his return but he is entering the last year of his deal and i'm not sure I would want to extend an injury prone big heading towards 30 years old. Rim runner types can lose their usefulness as their athleticism declines.


He might be the best defensive center in the league. He did things these playoffs no other center is doing defensively. Trading him for KAT to be the permanent replacement at Center seems like a mistake.

Well it's obviously him or Rudy.

I mean I'm high on Hukporti's potential. But I don't see the Knicks trading Mitch and not picking up a centre to block Huk's development of Thibs is still the coach.

Again, my question is what can you get as a big wing/4 for under $13m?

And, backtracking, yes Lonzo is theoretically interesting. But what faith does one have in his durability?


Honestly at this point I wouldn't even mind taking a chance in the draft to get a big wing/4 if someone was willing to give up a decent pick for a package of Mitch and maybe the Wizard protected pick. I know many people always seem to think we can't waste a player like Brunson's prime while developing young players but the Knicks have struggled with younger more athletic teams all year. I wouldn't mind an injection of youth, energy and athleticism.

It may be a gamble the team needs to make to get a potential difference maker since no team will likely give the Knicks a quality starter for the limited assets they want to offer unless the Knicks want to continue to make major changes to the core of the roster but at some point they just need to settle on a group an attempt to build some chemistry and continuity.
B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,562
And1: 6,397
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#546 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Sun Jun 1, 2025 7:28 am

JayTWill wrote:
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
He might be the best defensive center in the league. He did things these playoffs no other center is doing defensively. Trading him for KAT to be the permanent replacement at Center seems like a mistake.

Well it's obviously him or Rudy.

I mean I'm high on Hukporti's potential. But I don't see the Knicks trading Mitch and not picking up a centre to block Huk's development of Thibs is still the coach.

Again, my question is what can you get as a big wing/4 for under $13m?

And, backtracking, yes Lonzo is theoretically interesting. But what faith does one have in his durability?


Honestly at this point I wouldn't even mind taking a chance in the draft to get a big wing/4 if someone was willing to give up a decent pick for a package of Mitch and maybe the Wizard protected pick. I know many people always seem to think we can't waste a player like Brunson's prime while developing young players but the Knicks have struggled with younger more athletic teams all year. I wouldn't mind an injection of youth, energy and athleticism.

It may be a gamble the team needs to make to get a potential difference maker since no team will likely give the Knicks a quality starter for the limited assets they want to offer unless the Knicks want to continue to make major changes to the core of the roster but at some point they just need to settle on a group an attempt to build some chemistry and continuity.

Ok. I understand that point of view. But the Knicks already have Dadiet and McCullars .... who are good, going to be second year - just out of being dragged, big-wings/small-4s. So ... do you really need to draft another one. For Thibs to also not play and develop?

And give up Mitch for that opportunity?

I really don't think so.
KnixinSix
Head Coach
Posts: 7,122
And1: 3,786
Joined: Jul 27, 2013
Location: In the Spirit
       

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#547 » by KnixinSix » Sun Jun 1, 2025 8:30 am

Five top scenarios I can think of so far.....

1.Memphis wants to blow it up. Bridges still has strong value and was misused here. KAT finished top 10 in mvp even with the warts and is not a great fit with Brunson(from a defensive standpoint)

JJJ/Bane & Clark (for salary matching) for KAT/Bridges

JJJ/Mitch
OG/JJJ
Hart/OG
Bane/McBride
Brunson/Wright

Thats a much better lineup to assemble around Brunson.

OR

2. Giannis and Kuzma for KAT and Bridges and 3 FRP swaps and Wash 1st.

3.Bill Simmons suggested a 3 way deal with KAT and Spur picks going to Milwaukee, Giannis to NY and Bridges to Spurs

4. Would Phx be willing to move Dev Booker for KAT? Both have the EXACT same salary both in annual salary as well as total contract amount.

5. If Minny wants to resign Randle.....Mikal Bridges (24.9) and Kolek (2.1) for DDV (11.99) and Naz Reid (15M opted in player option)
New reality of Son ship!
All who receive and believe in Jesus, given the right to become children of God. Not born of flesh, but born of Spirit. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us. Glory that came from the Father, full of grace and truth.
-John 1
LookToShoot
Analyst
Posts: 3,107
And1: 1,679
Joined: Jun 22, 2014
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#548 » by LookToShoot » Sun Jun 1, 2025 11:07 am

KnixinSix wrote:Five top scenarios I can think of so far.....

1.Memphis wants to blow it up. Bridges still has strong value and was misused here. KAT finished top 10 in mvp even with the warts and is not a great fit with Brunson(from a defensive standpoint)

JJJ/Bane & Clark (for salary matching) for KAT/Bridges

JJJ/Mitch
OG/JJJ
Hart/OG
Bane/McBride
Brunson/Wright

Thats a much better lineup to assemble around Brunson.

OR

2. Giannis and Kuzma for KAT and Bridges and 3 FRP swaps and Wash 1st.

3.Bill Simmons suggested a 3 way deal with KAT and Spur picks going to Milwaukee, Giannis to NY and Bridges to Spurs

4. Would Phx be willing to move Dev Booker for KAT? Both have the EXACT same salary both in annual salary as well as total contract amount.

5. If Minny wants to resign Randle.....Mikal Bridges (24.9) and Kolek (2.1) for DDV (11.99) and Naz Reid (15M opted in player option)


Brunson is terrible and you’re still talking about building around him? Jaren Jackson is another soft big man who jacks up threes.

It’s Giannis or bust.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#549 » by WargamesX » Sun Jun 1, 2025 11:18 am

Here just an idea

Knicks trade: KAT, Dadiet, Kolek
Knicks get: Herb Jones, RJ Barrett, Yvissi Missi, LAL 2027 2nd rounder

Pelicans trade: CJ McCollum, Herb Jones, Yvissi Missi, 2026 Indy draft pick
Pelicans get: KAT, Kolek

Raptors trade: RJ Barrett,
Raptors get: CJ McCollum, Dadiet, Indiana 2026 first rounder (owned by Pelicans)

Knicks get under the luxury tax and use some seconds to trade for DDV. Now there are 10 guys Thibs will play, and 3 defensive centers on the roster to avoid overplaying Mitch. Pelicans get a team that can hopefully get into the playoffs with. Raptors get a backup Guard who brings outside scoring and potentially can play PG behind IQ.

Knicks roster:
Brunson/DDV
RJ/Mcbride
Bridges/Hart
OG/Herb Jones
Mitch/Missi/Huk

There is a version of this that could lead to the Knicks getting Bobby Portis by trading the Bucks Herb Jones, but honestly who knows what the bucks will do. They might also want draft compensation for Portis.

The most notable thing is mathematically KAT being traded could bring back 4 players. That is how expensive his contract is.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
Knicks218
Starter
Posts: 2,010
And1: 153
Joined: Aug 24, 2003
Location: Spanish Harlem NYC
       

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#550 » by Knicks218 » Sun Jun 1, 2025 11:34 am

OG, Bridges, Mitch, Duce. For Giannis, Dame. Works in Trade Machine. Sign Bruce Brown.

PG- Brunson/Dame
SG-Brown
SF-Hart
PF-Giannis
C-Towns
Men Lie, Women Lie, STAT's Don't. STAT & MELO!! (Jesus Christ Saves)
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,712
And1: 4,933
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#551 » by seren » Sun Jun 1, 2025 11:39 am

Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,841
And1: 8,099
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#552 » by WargamesX » Sun Jun 1, 2025 12:09 pm

seren wrote:Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.

2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,944
And1: 6,003
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Trade OG 

Post#553 » by R-DAWG » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:09 pm

TKKnicks1 wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
TKKnicks1 wrote:You don't trade players like OG. He's top 5 defensive player and his offense has been coming along nicely. He's the ultimate type of player to have on a championship team.


Are we talking about a 3rd year player who’s becoming extension eligible or an 8 year vet on a max contract entering his age 28 season.

I’m all for selling high on OG - even though he’s a better player than Bridges


Derrick White
Aaron Gordon

I might even put Miles Turner in that conversation

No one is putting OG as option 1 or 2 on this team. He's excellent as an option 3. In fact you won't find a better two way player than him as an option 3 in the NBA.
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,944
And1: 6,003
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Trade OG 

Post#554 » by R-DAWG » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:09 pm

TKKnicks1 wrote:
R-DAWG wrote:
TKKnicks1 wrote:You don't trade players like OG. He's top 5 defensive player and his offense has been coming along nicely. He's the ultimate type of player to have on a championship team.


Are we talking about a 3rd year player who’s becoming extension eligible or an 8 year vet on a max contract entering his age 28 season.

I’m all for selling high on OG - even though he’s a better player than

No one is putting OG as option 1 or 2 on this team. He's excellent as an option 3. In fact you won't find a better two way player than him as an option 3 in the NBA.


Derick White
R-DAWG
RealGM
Posts: 19,944
And1: 6,003
Joined: Nov 07, 2003

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#555 » by R-DAWG » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:10 pm

WargamesX wrote:
seren wrote:Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.

2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.


Same with Anunoby

And Bridges extension is going to also be in that discussion
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,712
And1: 4,933
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#556 » by seren » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:18 pm

R-DAWG wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
seren wrote:Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.

2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.


Same with Anunoby

And Bridges extension is going to also be in that discussion


I don’t think they do a trade and end up getting less talent. And getting more talent will be tough given 2nd apron. Just checked Giannis and KD contracts. Both make more than KAT. We can’t get them and stay over the 2nd apron. If you get either, we will also have to trade bunch of other players to third teams to stay under apron.
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,412
And1: 6,350
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#557 » by 8516knicks » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:35 pm

WargamesX wrote:
seren wrote:Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.

2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.


KAT and Thibs for 2025-26 means we are not likely to ever again reach the ECF. One or both have to go. Yesterday was like the Pacers on ice skates and the Knicks stuck in cement. For a reported D coach, Thibs screwed the pooch. And that's not even getting into the pound 17 seconds for an iso offense. That worked well yesterday, didn't it? If this was baseball, KAT would be the designated hitter. And valuable. But it's basketball. :nonono:
LookToShoot
Analyst
Posts: 3,107
And1: 1,679
Joined: Jun 22, 2014
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#558 » by LookToShoot » Sun Jun 1, 2025 1:47 pm

WargamesX wrote:
seren wrote:Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.

2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.


Scapegoating KAT when he just got there. Brunson should be traded along with the Villanova famailia.
8516knicks
General Manager
Posts: 8,412
And1: 6,350
Joined: May 18, 2017
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#559 » by 8516knicks » Sun Jun 1, 2025 2:00 pm

LookToShoot wrote:
WargamesX wrote:
seren wrote:Honestly with the second apron rules, I don’t see any big trade for us. If something happens, it would involve Hart or Bridges and bring back a similar smaller contract, not Giannis or KD size one. I am hoping they use the minimum contracts a bit wiser. Given Philly, Milwaukee, and Boston are not expected to get better and Cleveland may struggle to keep the roster together, I think we can be right back where we are next year.

2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.


Scapegoating KAT when he just got there. Brunson should be traded along with the Villanova famailia.


Because you miss Fizdale?
LookToShoot
Analyst
Posts: 3,107
And1: 1,679
Joined: Jun 22, 2014
   

Re: Trades and Transactions Thread - 2025 Cont'd 

Post#560 » by LookToShoot » Sun Jun 1, 2025 2:02 pm

8516knicks wrote:
LookToShoot wrote:
WargamesX wrote:2nd apron rules is another reason they should trade KAT. He’s making too much money based on his production and liabilities.


Scapegoating KAT when he just got there. Brunson should be traded along with the Villanova famailia.


Because you miss Fizdale?


I don’t see the correlation. Do you own a Brunson jersey and don’t want to buy a new one?

Return to New York Knicks