spree2kawhi wrote:Deeeez Knicks wrote:TerrenceClarke wrote:
Umm....RJ is not in the same class as Wiggins I would not see them doing the same. Wiggins was an ELITE prospect....In retrospect RJ isnt.
RJ was a top prospect too, maybe not as hyped up as Wiggins. Doesn’t really matter much after a few years in the league anyway.
The comparison is Wiggins thriving as a #3 type guy who does a little bit of everything on the right team. He’s blossoming at age 26/27. Basically learning how to play off the ball, pick his spots while staying aggressive, and doing other things. RJ has a different game but he can be that type of contributor on a winning team, easily.
Nice, so we’ve got our fourth option down. Let’s rock!
It’s sad but he’s probably the best core piece we have.