Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
I like what Derek Harper has to say about him. Harper was a solid player and now covers the Mavs so he knows Brunson’s game well. I respect Harper’s opinion and he’s very high on this guy.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Bob Ross
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,128
- And1: 7,517
- Joined: Nov 28, 2011
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
I'm pretty excited about Brunson
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- DowNY
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,879
- And1: 10,366
- Joined: Dec 19, 2010
- Location: Your mom's crib, NYC
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
rajajackal wrote:knicks94 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Brunson best Knick PG under the age of 30 since ?
Raymond Felton
that would imply that raymond felton was better for us than jeremy lin was
Well we went to the playoffs with Felton, not the 2 weeks of Lin.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Besart19
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,787
- And1: 5,055
- Joined: Feb 12, 2012
- Location: Dibra, Albania
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Mitch / Sims / Gibson
Durant / Toppin / Melo
Full MLE/ Reddish / Kels
Barrett / Quickley / Grimes
Brunson / Rose / McBride
Durant / Toppin / Melo
Full MLE/ Reddish / Kels
Barrett / Quickley / Grimes
Brunson / Rose / McBride
Strength and Honour!
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Guano
- RealGM
- Posts: 39,307
- And1: 66,548
- Joined: Dec 16, 2010
- Location: any port
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
KnicksGod wrote:He has guts as a player and guts to come to NYC in our present, long-lasting state especially. I'm good with it.
This is where I'm at with it.
When you're ugly and desperate you're forced to love the ones that want you.
Chanel Bomber wrote:This board really is full of bad people.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Guano wrote:KnicksGod wrote:He has guts as a player and guts to come to NYC in our present, long-lasting state especially. I'm good with it.
This is where I'm at with it.
When you're ugly and desperate you're forced to love the ones that want you.
Was that a roundabout way of soliciting a hug?
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- rajajackal
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,653
- And1: 9,780
- Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
DowNY wrote:rajajackal wrote:knicks94 wrote:Raymond Felton
that would imply that raymond felton was better for us than jeremy lin was
Well we went to the playoffs with Felton, not the 2 weeks of Lin.
my understanding is that we're talking about best point guard play, not present-for-melo's-big-year-with-kidd/sheed/thomas-leading-the-locker-room
also we did go to the playoffs with lin. then he didn't play at "85%" and that was basically the writing on the wall for his time here in new york
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- rajajackal
- General Manager
- Posts: 7,653
- And1: 9,780
- Joined: Nov 04, 2013
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Besart19 wrote:Mitch / Sims / Gibson
Durant / Toppin / Melo
Full MLE/ Reddish / Kels
Barrett / Quickley / Grimes
Brunson / Rose / McBride
1. what did we trade to acquire durant here? randle, fournier, and picks? lmao
2. melo is not coming home to ride the pine. he'd be a rotation player
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Polk377
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,518
- And1: 5,916
- Joined: Apr 19, 2002
- Location: Medford, NY
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
rajajackal wrote:DowNY wrote:rajajackal wrote:that would imply that raymond felton was better for us than jeremy lin was
Well we went to the playoffs with Felton, not the 2 weeks of Lin.
my understanding is that we're talking about best point guard play, not present-for-melo's-big-year-with-kidd/sheed/thomas-leading-the-locker-room
also we did go to the playoffs with lin. then he didn't play at "85%" and that was basically the writing on the wall for his time here in new york
It was more that ridiculous poison pill contract Houston gave him which he never lived up to. They did him a favor because if he came back and couldn't repeat that run we would have killed him in here
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Besart19
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,787
- And1: 5,055
- Joined: Feb 12, 2012
- Location: Dibra, Albania
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
rajajackal wrote:Besart19 wrote:Mitch / Sims / Gibson
Durant / Toppin / Melo
Full MLE/ Reddish / Kels
Barrett / Quickley / Grimes
Brunson / Rose / McBride
1. what did we trade to acquire durant here? randle, fournier, and picks? lmao
2. melo is not coming home to ride the pine. he'd be a rotation player
Neither Durant nor the Nets have any leverage!
This is Jimmy Butler and Paul George kind of situation when the formers asked out of Chicago and Indiana respectively
Fournier has only one year remaining and Randle with Irving will be Derron Williams with Brook Lopez part Twei
Strength and Honour!
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
knicks512
- Junior
- Posts: 282
- And1: 1,144
- Joined: Dec 24, 2014
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks Byke wrote:Oscirus wrote:I think you mean the heat. Melo had to bring the ball up that game
I remember that, man was shook.
I was at the Lakers game where he dropped 38
Special night at MSG.
I was at the Mavs game and he dunked. Was awesome. Went to eat and came back to the Garden for the Ranger game that night and they won in overtime. Amazing day.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- Besart19
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,787
- And1: 5,055
- Joined: Feb 12, 2012
- Location: Dibra, Albania
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
DOT wrote:R-DAWG wrote:DOT wrote:I don't think you can call it "ideal, team-friendly" if the player gets to decide to skip out on the least-expensive year.
It's team friendly that the numbers decline as the cap increases which (a) provides more cap flexibility and (b) brings the contract closer to market rate for an average starting PG as the deal gets shorter.
Actually, it's kind of the opposite
It raises the AAV slightly because it becomes a 3 year deal for $80 million instead of 4/104
That's player friendly, because he can opt out for a bigger bag in 3 years while still getting the largest yearly payday
It would only be team friendly in the way you think if the last year was a team option, not a player option. It would be more team friendly if it were an increasing deal
Because the first 2 years will be more expensive than if it were increasing, and we're only gonna save like $2 million (if that) in his 3rd year vs an increasing, then we have to re-sign him in year 4 for more than he would have made, which more than offsets any gains
It's really not team friendly, it's very player friendly.
If he performs that well that he wont mind opting out than its still a great deal plus you shall have the full bird rights after three full seasons
Strength and Honour!
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Polk377
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,518
- And1: 5,916
- Joined: Apr 19, 2002
- Location: Medford, NY
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Besart19 wrote:DOT wrote:R-DAWG wrote:
It's team friendly that the numbers decline as the cap increases which (a) provides more cap flexibility and (b) brings the contract closer to market rate for an average starting PG as the deal gets shorter.
Actually, it's kind of the opposite
It raises the AAV slightly because it becomes a 3 year deal for $80 million instead of 4/104
That's player friendly, because he can opt out for a bigger bag in 3 years while still getting the largest yearly payday
It would only be team friendly in the way you think if the last year was a team option, not a player option. It would be more team friendly if it were an increasing deal
Because the first 2 years will be more expensive than if it were increasing, and we're only gonna save like $2 million (if that) in his 3rd year vs an increasing, then we have to re-sign him in year 4 for more than he would have made, which more than offsets any gains
It's really not team friendly, it's very player friendly.
If he performs that well that he wont mind opting out than its still a great deal plus you shall have the full bird rights after three full seasons
By next off season the deal will already be a steal based on these max extensions the younger guys are getting. By the time the last year of his contract comes around, he will be getting paid the same as high end bench PGs.
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,788
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
rajajackal wrote:DowNY wrote:rajajackal wrote:that would imply that raymond felton was better for us than jeremy lin was
Well we went to the playoffs with Felton, not the 2 weeks of Lin.
my understanding is that we're talking about best point guard play, not present-for-melo's-big-year-with-kidd/sheed/thomas-leading-the-locker-room
also we did go to the playoffs with lin. then he didn't play at "85%" and that was basically the writing on the wall for his time here in new york
If memory serves correct, we were out of the playoffs (11th) when Lin & Amare went down. Then Melo went on that ridiculous tear to end 11-12 - quite possibly his best basketball of his career. Then we finished in 7th.
I was a huge Lin supporter and wanted to re-sign him. Made no sense to me that we let him go for free. Keep him, make him the 6th man with JR, then trade him if there’s too big of a glut.
We desperately needed a guard who could finish in that IND series.
Anyway, time marches on
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,788
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
knicks512 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Knicks Byke wrote:
I remember that, man was shook.
I was at the Lakers game where he dropped 38
Special night at MSG.
I was at the Mavs game and he dunked. Was awesome. Went to eat and came back to the Garden for the Ranger game that night and they won in overtime. Amazing day.
I was at the CHI Easter game.
And I’ve been a Melo apologist ever since
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,105
- And1: 96,062
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
Well, coach Eric says the Knicks suck and play iso ball so signing Jalen was kind of pointless.
I agree. Knicks should empty the roster and promote Westchester to the NBA, since none of the current players are bringing in a championship.
I agree. Knicks should empty the roster and promote Westchester to the NBA, since none of the current players are bringing in a championship.

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,788
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
nedleeds wrote:Brunson was the highest efficiency pick and roll player in the league among players with at least 4 pnr's a game who played at least 50 games.
I'm certain playing with chuckers like _ulius and R_ will get him to the bottom of the league in no time.
RJ 3PT % when set up - 36.6% w/ 26.2% frequency
Julius 3PT % when set up - 29.2% w/ 19.6% frequency
Just some of the numbers available here
https://go.nba.com/9y6m3
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- dakomish23
- Forum Mod - Knicks

- Posts: 58,788
- And1: 48,762
- Joined: Sep 22, 2013
- Location: Empire State
-
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
thebuzzardman wrote:Well, coach Eric says the Knicks suck and play iso ball so signing Jalen was kind of pointless.
I agree. Knicks should empty the roster and promote Westchester to the NBA, since none of the current players are bringing in a championship.
Feels good to talk so much and particularly, talk highly, about a player all year and then actually get him.
We rarely get what we want
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
#FreeJimmit
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
- thebuzzardman
- RealGM
- Posts: 82,105
- And1: 96,062
- Joined: Jun 24, 2006
- Location: Villanovknicks
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
dakomish23 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Well, coach Eric says the Knicks suck and play iso ball so signing Jalen was kind of pointless.
I agree. Knicks should empty the roster and promote Westchester to the NBA, since none of the current players are bringing in a championship.
Feels good to talk so much and particularly, talk highly, about a player all year and then actually get him.
We rarely get what we want
The best part is not even being allowed to feel good about it.
1/2 the media sh*ts on it.
Even some coaching vids dufus craps on it
1/2 the board hates it or is mad some fictional move didn't happen
Another large segment mad it wasn't a championship move.
Elf should have come back on a 4 year deal

Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
-
Clyde_Style
- RealGM
- Posts: 71,855
- And1: 69,930
- Joined: Jul 12, 2009
Re: Shams: Jalen Brunson to New York on 4 year/$104m deal
thebuzzardman wrote:dakomish23 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Well, coach Eric says the Knicks suck and play iso ball so signing Jalen was kind of pointless.
I agree. Knicks should empty the roster and promote Westchester to the NBA, since none of the current players are bringing in a championship.
Feels good to talk so much and particularly, talk highly, about a player all year and then actually get him.
We rarely get what we want
The best part is not even being allowed to feel good about it.
1/2 the media sh*ts on it.
Even some coaching vids dufus craps on it
1/2 the board hates it or is mad some fictional move didn't happen
Another large segment mad it wasn't a championship move.
Elf should have come back on a 4 year deal
I’ll give you crackers and water and an extra hour in the yard if you say something positive












