Tron Carter wrote:lmao miles got schooled
So you saying this was Perry after he watched it?

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Tron Carter wrote:lmao miles got schooled


K-DOT wrote:I like how people make it sound so easy
"Oh the Knicks shoulda tanked, the dummies"
Like, we won 22 games with healthy KP, 7 games after he went down (and really, the last one was against the Cavs end of bench guys, so I don't know how we're supposed to lose that one)
We won more games with KP than the Suns won all year, and the same amount as the Grizzlies
KP is literally the only reason we don't have a top 3 pick right now

god shammgod wrote:most picks disappoint no matter what their age. if you're not at the very top of the draft it's always very risky.
GEOLINK wrote:

Juco24 wrote:Is it me or does it seem that SGA is going in the top 10

Nyk_Fatboy wrote:GEOLINK wrote:
These youngstas becoming more and more diva like. This would of been an honor to play for the grizz if it was wendell speaking

Fury wrote:Nyk_Fatboy wrote:GEOLINK wrote:
These youngstas becoming more and more diva like. This would of been an honor to play for the grizz if it was wendell speaking
Lol and kobe wasn’t
KnixinSix wrote:Based on reports my latest Knicks Big Board:
1. Ayrton Chance at #9 -0%
2. Doncic Chance at #9 -0% (chance in top 4 -50%/ possible trade up option?)
3. Begley Chance at #9 -0%
4. JJJ Chance at #9 -0%
5. Porter Chance at #9 – 20% (could be off the Knicks board entirely with injury drama stuff)
6. Young Chance at #9 -25% (interest Hawks #3, Magic #6, Bulls #7,Cleveland #8)
7. Wendell Carter Chance at #9- 40%
8. Bamba Chance at #9-30% (down this low due to limited offensive upside, Knicks may not want him)
9. Knox Chance at 9- 70% (interest Magic #6, Bulls #7)
10. Sexton Chance at 9- 70% (Magic #6)
11. Lonnie Walker Chance at #9-85%
?
HarthorneWingo wrote:god shammgod wrote:most picks disappoint no matter what their age. if you're not at the very top of the draft it's always very risky.
I know what you mean. If we only had been bad enough to draft Fultz.
HarthorneWingo wrote:god shammgod wrote:most picks disappoint no matter what their age. if you're not at the very top of the draft it's always very risky.
I know what you mean. If we only had been bad enough to draft Fultz.
reub wrote:FrontOfficeEye wrote:
Was watching live but was worried about losing the stream, otherwise I would have posted it.
fatalogic wrote:I hope he drops, he doesn't deserve to suffer with the Kings or Suns.
If only the Knicks could have tanked better.
I would trade our #9, next year's first, THJr or Lee plus take Chandler Parsons off of their hands for Doncic. No one will beat that trade offer and Doncic's worth it.

god shammgod wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:god shammgod wrote:most picks disappoint no matter what their age. if you're not at the very top of the draft it's always very risky.
I know what you mean. If we only had been bad enough to draft Fultz.
you're on this mission to prove it doesn't matter where you pick when you know it's not true. there's mistakes everywhere. but as i explained multiple times now, the odds are better higher. between 1 and 9 the chance of getting someone special drops significantly. there's no arguing this.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
god shammgod wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:god shammgod wrote:most picks disappoint no matter what their age. if you're not at the very top of the draft it's always very risky.
I know what you mean. If we only had been bad enough to draft Fultz.
you're on this mission to prove it doesn't matter where you pick when you know it's not true. there's mistakes everywhere. but as i explained multiple times now, the odds are better higher. between 1 and 9 the chance of getting someone special drops significantly. there's no arguing this.
dakomish23 wrote:god shammgod wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
I know what you mean. If we only had been bad enough to draft Fultz.
you're on this mission to prove it doesn't matter where you pick when you know it's not true. there's mistakes everywhere. but as i explained multiple times now, the odds are better higher. between 1 and 9 the chance of getting someone special drops significantly. there's no arguing this.
It wasn't KP & the kids that won us these games. It was KP & the vets. The vets filled in the gaps. It's a formula that we've seen before in other places as they prioritized getting low seed playoff experience over potentially adding a long term piece. See NOP.
Even then we weren't going to make the playoffs but this organization would of gladly taken the 35 wins and worse pick IMO.
HW if the Knicks were picking first would you say I don't want the #1 pick b/c all stars can be picked anywhere?

K-DOT wrote:I like how people make it sound so easy
"Oh the Knicks shoulda tanked, the dummies"
Like, we won 22 games with healthy KP, 7 games after he went down (and really, the last one was against the Cavs end of bench guys, so I don't know how we're supposed to lose that one)
We won more games with KP than the Suns won all year, and the same amount as the Grizzlies
KP is literally the only reason we don't have a top 3 pick right now