ITGM wrote:

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23
Mr_Perfect wrote:Shemy wrote:before we get started Id like to point out that
"Melo has the worst playoff record in NBA history"
Can't argue with facts.
Thugger HBC wrote:This deal is pretty much the same as Fields.
Teams are trying to save ourselves from ourselves.
RHODEY wrote:i'll repeat my sentiments again...I don't understand why, after a contract to be matched has been signed between the Rockets and Lin, they can - at the 11th hour, no less - replace that contract with a new one that is more impervious to being matched by the Knicks. Seems underhanded to me on the part of both the Rockets and Lin. Given that Lin is a Harvard graduate, I'm sure that he is smart enough to understand the disloyal, misleading, calculated aspects of his maneuvering in collaboration with the Rockets.
Do we really want to outlay that much money for a player who apparently doesn't want to be a NYK and who apparently behaved deceptively during the negotiations?
In any sport, if I'm a coach, manager or GM, I'd want players who have enthusiasm for playing for the team I coach or manage in some capacity. I also think that Lin has already undermined his camaraderie with his fellow Knicks. The Knicks are now an older team for the most part, but they have players who want to be Knicks.
I see no reason why Lin who agreed to the original Houston offer and was fully aware that it was in the best interest of the Knicks didn't insist on that original offer being honored. He had cash in hand either way. The original offer *for sure* kept him in NY.
For a guy from Harvard did he really think that the new contract that totally hoses the Knicks payroll going forward would somehow be way better than the love and respect he earned in NY? Did he think he wouldn't make up that money in the first few months of a NY contract?
Lin, no matter what the numbers say, was in NO danger of not making huge endorsement money that render the contract numbers quaint.
barborous wrote:so anyone up for a game of rock paper scissors?
GONYK wrote:adjacent2bench wrote:How is it that every damn summer, the Knicks have to be in the middle of some damn controversy. I was happy last year after Paul went to L.A, that the Knicks could just have a chill summer. Honestly don't see that happening any time soon, especially with all these "20 _ _ Free Agency" plans.
This really isnt a controversy. It's a simple process of matching a RFA. It happens every offseason, multiple times an offseason.
Realmatic wrote:Can we call kevin willis out of retirement?
Grinditout wrote:
Thugger HBC wrote:This deal is pretty much the same as Fields.
Teams are trying to save ourselves from ourselves.
Knicks80_20 wrote:barborous wrote:so anyone up for a game of rock paper scissors?
I got rock.
Knicks80_20 wrote:barborous wrote:so anyone up for a game of rock paper scissors?
I got rock.
CoolKids wrote:Knicks80_20 wrote:barborous wrote:so anyone up for a game of rock paper scissors?
I got rock.
Paper. Boom.
Knicks80_20 wrote:Thugger HBC wrote:This deal is pretty much the same as Fields.
Teams are trying to save ourselves from ourselves.
Because Lin = Fields, amirite?
Lightning25 wrote:If NYK doesn't match Lin's contract.