ImageImageImageImageImage

Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle

Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully

nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,055
And1: 8,098
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#61 » by nedleeds » Sat Oct 21, 2023 3:38 pm

Gravy wrote:Some fans, usually the hardcore tankers preferred the bad years over this. You could get excited at draft time that maybe we got the next Lebron or Wemby. A homegrown star to root for is what they really want, even more than wins sometimes.

Hoping your 2nd round team which was the youngest left in the playoffs gets worse instead to the ecf so you can be right is some real hating lol


Who cares if you are "youngest" left if none of your young player project to be top 25 players? Lets sign a **** fetus so we can brag about our young roster, of young rotation / league average starter players.

We lost to Cleveland, nobody here wouldn't swap our roster for theirs in a heartbeat. They have a top 15 player, Garland and Mobley are worlds better than our road apples under 24.

There are no hardcore tankers because we've never tanked, that's a lie. We had a few bad seasons but ownership immediately begins jerking their meat for a mid-tier playoff team as soon as the hat is on our draft pick. We have less top 5 picks (three) than any franchise in the league and we have zero titles in that time period.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,120
And1: 9,611
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#62 » by Gravy » Sat Oct 21, 2023 3:46 pm

nedleeds wrote:
Gravy wrote:Some fans, usually the hardcore tankers preferred the bad years over this. You could get excited at draft time that maybe we got the next Lebron or Wemby. A homegrown star to root for is what they really want, even more than wins sometimes.

Hoping your 2nd round team which was the youngest left in the playoffs gets worse instead to the ecf so you can be right is some real hating lol


Who cares if you are "youngest" left if none of your young player project to be top 25 players? Lets sign a **** fetus so we can brag about our young roster, of young rotation / league average starter players.

We lost to Cleveland, nobody here wouldn't swap our roster for theirs in a heartbeat. They have a top 15 player, Garland and Mobley are worlds better than our road apples under 24.

There are no hardcore tankers because we've never tanked, that's a lie. We had a few bad seasons but ownership immediately begins jerking their meat for a mid-tier playoff team as soon as the hat is on our draft pick. We have less top 5 picks (three) than any franchise in the league and we have zero titles in that time period.

We beat Cleveland. I'd rather be the team that won

Your list of top 5 teams is incredibly misleading. How many of those teams with multiple top 5 picks had that pick lead them to a championship? How many times did they move up in the lottery to get to the top 5 while we moved down?
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,620
And1: 27,343
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#63 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 22, 2023 3:47 pm

DaGawd wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
KnixtapeH20 wrote:Ask me at the deadline or after Thibs pisses me off the first of a hundred thousand


I am all for a proper tank for a generational star but, it will never happen. Not while Dolan lives and breathes.

we did it for zion and ended up with rj… even if we did it there’s no guarantee


We didn't get a generational star...so...we should have tanked again until we did. I know it's no guarantee.
:beer: RIP mags
User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,120
And1: 9,611
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#64 » by Gravy » Sun Oct 22, 2023 6:05 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
DaGawd wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
I am all for a proper tank for a generational star but, it will never happen. Not while Dolan lives and breathes.

we did it for zion and ended up with rj… even if we did it there’s no guarantee


We didn't get a generational star...so...we should have tanked again until we did. I know it's no guarantee.

How long does it take to find out if a young player is a generational star? Some fans are still waiting for RJ :D
User avatar
DaGawd
RealGM
Posts: 38,906
And1: 51,937
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
Location: Queens, NY
     

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#65 » by DaGawd » Sun Oct 22, 2023 6:14 pm

Gravy wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
DaGawd wrote:we did it for zion and ended up with rj… even if we did it there’s no guarantee


We didn't get a generational star...so...we should have tanked again until we did. I know it's no guarantee.

How long does it take to find out if a young player is a generational star? Some fans are still waiting for RJ :D

yeah this is asking for a multi year process type tank which is alil different than saying the knicks will never tank under dolan.. that’s def something that won’t happen
BaF
Washington Wizards
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 82,608
And1: 96,658
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#66 » by thebuzzardman » Sun Oct 22, 2023 7:38 pm

Jacob Toppin is Jerricho Slim
Image
User avatar
Gravy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,120
And1: 9,611
Joined: Jun 25, 2015
     

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#67 » by Gravy » Sun Oct 22, 2023 7:46 pm

DaGawd wrote:
Gravy wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
We didn't get a generational star...so...we should have tanked again until we did. I know it's no guarantee.

How long does it take to find out if a young player is a generational star? Some fans are still waiting for RJ :D

yeah this is asking for a multi year process type tank which is alil different than saying the knicks will never tank under dolan.. that’s def something that won’t happen

Pat Riley hasn't tanked since 2008 when they got Michael Beasley and he's still considered one of the best gms. Knicks should have gave him the keys when we had the chance.
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,620
And1: 27,343
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#68 » by Jalen Bluntson » Sun Oct 22, 2023 8:01 pm

Gravy wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:
DaGawd wrote:we did it for zion and ended up with rj… even if we did it there’s no guarantee


We didn't get a generational star...so...we should have tanked again until we did. I know it's no guarantee.

How long does it take to find out if a young player is a generational star? Some fans are still waiting for RJ :D


I'm not implying that a tank will guarantee anything. I just would have gone full youth movement, live in the draft a few years when we drafted RJ. It didn't happen. That's what I'm talking about. Not one year and move on. I mean, had we hit on the picks we did have at any point since Phil stopped trading them...we are not having this discussion. We missed a few gems in recent years.
:beer: RIP mags
KNICKS007
Sophomore
Posts: 249
And1: 158
Joined: Jan 03, 2017
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#69 » by KNICKS007 » Sun Oct 22, 2023 8:05 pm

nedleeds wrote:
KNICKS007 wrote:
Jose7 wrote:
Ive earned my stripes. I can leave for regular season and come back for a playoff run.

I am definitely hoping for a blow up though. Brunson's great. Us locking into the randle stuff not trading him several times over is just a waste of time.

And RJ stinks too.



Unless you just became a Knicks fan in the last 22 months and Missed the countless years of Tanking and trying to build through the draft and ended up with Frank, RJ, and KP.


We've never tanked. In fact the number of picks the Knicks have had in the top 5 is pathetic since Ewing. The exact opposite of everything you are saying is true.

Since Ewing we've had THREE god damn top 5 picks. Kenny Walker. KP. R_ Barrett.

Since Ewing here's every team that won a championship and their number of top 5 picks.

Heat have 4 and didn't exist in 1986.
Celts have 5 and one dropped dead.
Cleveland have 9.
GSW have 6. (and Curry and Klay 7 and 11)
Spurs have 4.
Lakers had 4.
Mil had 4.
Raps have 7.
Detroit have 5.
Mavs had 4. (and Dirk at 6)
Hou at 4.
Chi has 8.
Den has 6.

You are either 6 years old or lying.


How many 50+ loss season have we had.

Besides that, every Knick Regime has fumble the ball on draft night, always leaving the better player on the boards. So there's no way you can confidently support building through the draft.

A combination of trades, FA, Picks is what it takes, It just seems that every regime we have can only do 1 out of the 3 well
WargamesX
RealGM
Posts: 10,850
And1: 8,102
Joined: Apr 10, 2017
   

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#70 » by WargamesX » Sun Oct 22, 2023 11:39 pm

Idk where to put this but isn’t tomorrow the last day they can extend IQ?
Matthew 6:5
Luke 15:3-7
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,017
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#71 » by Chanel Bomber » Mon Oct 23, 2023 12:11 am

nedleeds wrote:
KNICKS007 wrote:
Jose7 wrote:
Ive earned my stripes. I can leave for regular season and come back for a playoff run.

I am definitely hoping for a blow up though. Brunson's great. Us locking into the randle stuff not trading him several times over is just a waste of time.

And RJ stinks too.



Unless you just became a Knicks fan in the last 22 months and Missed the countless years of Tanking and trying to build through the draft and ended up with Frank, RJ, and KP.


We've never tanked. In fact the number of picks the Knicks have had in the top 5 is pathetic since Ewing. The exact opposite of everything you are saying is true.

Since Ewing we've had THREE god damn top 5 picks. Kenny Walker. KP. R_ Barrett.

Since Ewing here's every team that won a championship and their number of top 5 picks.

Heat have 4 and didn't exist in 1986.
Celts have 5 and one dropped dead.
Cleveland have 9.
GSW have 6. (and Curry and Klay 7 and 11)
Spurs have 4.
Lakers had 4.
Mil had 4.
Raps have 7.
Detroit have 5.
Mavs had 4. (and Dirk at 6)
Hou at 4.
Chi has 8.
Den has 6.

You are either 6 years old or lying.

More often than not agree with you but we did tank in 2018-19. That season was an incredible tank job.

One could argue they also tanked in 2014-15 but they botched it in the end by putting themselves in a position to lose the tiebreaker.

Also the prize was KAT who hasn't exactly blossomed into the superstar he was expected to become. A fair question regarding that is would you be fine having KAT on his current contract on the team or would you view him in the same way you view Brunson and Randle?

To Gravy's point, we tend to over-fantasize about draft position but tanking is far from fail-proof because - Wembies and LeBrons aside - scouting and sheer luck also play a huge role in picking the right player.

Passing on Haliburton in 2020 was a far bigger crime, and that occurred outside the top 5.
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,055
And1: 8,098
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#72 » by nedleeds » Mon Oct 23, 2023 1:11 am

Chanel Bomber wrote:
nedleeds wrote:
KNICKS007 wrote:

Unless you just became a Knicks fan in the last 22 months and Missed the countless years of Tanking and trying to build through the draft and ended up with Frank, RJ, and KP.


We've never tanked. In fact the number of picks the Knicks have had in the top 5 is pathetic since Ewing. The exact opposite of everything you are saying is true.

Since Ewing we've had THREE god damn top 5 picks. Kenny Walker. KP. R_ Barrett.

Since Ewing here's every team that won a championship and their number of top 5 picks.

Heat have 4 and didn't exist in 1986.
Celts have 5 and one dropped dead.
Cleveland have 9.
GSW have 6. (and Curry and Klay 7 and 11)
Spurs have 4.
Lakers had 4.
Mil had 4.
Raps have 7.
Detroit have 5.
Mavs had 4. (and Dirk at 6)
Hou at 4.
Chi has 8.
Den has 6.

You are either 6 years old or lying.

More often than not agree with you but we did tank in 2018-19. That season was an incredible tank job.

One could argue they also tanked in 2014-15 but they botched it in the end by putting themselves in a position to lose the tiebreaker.

Also the prize was KAT who hasn't exactly blossomed into the superstar he was expected to become. A fair question regarding that is would you be fine having KAT on his current contract on the team or would you view him in the same way you view Brunson and Randle?

To Gravy's point, we tend to over-fantasize about draft position but tanking is far from fail-proof because - Wembies and LeBrons aside - scouting and sheer luck also play a huge role in picking the right player.

Passing on Haliburton in 2020 was a far bigger crime, and that occurred outside the top 5.


Depends on your definition of a tanking franchise but sure. We tanked for 1 year, got RJ and should have just continued tanking. After year 2 it was obvious RJ was never going to be a top 25 player. Instead we signed rotation players like Randle and Morris and won 6 too many games and picked 8th.

When we got KP in the 2015 draft again we should have continued the tank by trying get a 1st for Melo, who played 72 games the following year. Granted Toronto (?) had our pick but still 32-50 is not tanking it's literally the worst place to be in the NBA. I know Melo had a no trade, etc. but again we take the short cut and think we can compete for ... what? Dolans playoff revenue.

I'm looking at this franchise through old 47 year old eyes. We never, ever, tank and bottom out for long enough to get enough swings to find Dirk, or Steph, or get lucky enough to get #1 the year Tim Duncan or LeFlop is available.

We quite literally have the fewest picks in the top 5 in the **** league and it shows in the futility.

As for the KP draft and could we have KAT instead, I think in general it would be a wash, KAT would have been a tank commander, I guess not blown his knee out in year 2? He's have played with Melo that rookie year when Melo was checked out and not playing defense already under Phil / Derek Failure. I think think it's less about KAT/KP or Deangelo Russell than they didn't trade Melo for a 1st and flotsam.

I don't masturbate over the draft, but when you have no top 25 player and no young player that projects to the top 15 what are you doing if you aren't trying in the draft? Treadmilling to mostly no where. Could we have found Kawhi instead of Grimes, Dirk instead of Obi ... sure. Scouting matters but sometimes just lots of picks from 1 to 15 is the other way. Look at what Phoenix had to do just to get Booker, Philly just to get Embiid, Bucks just to get Giannis ... You forget the Bucks picked Jabari Parker, Jimmer, John Henson in that span.

The Knicks plan is an absolute 100% shot to neither

a) get to the Finals
b) get a top 5 pick

and this is why we fail.

Image
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,017
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#73 » by Chanel Bomber » Mon Oct 23, 2023 1:31 am

nedleeds wrote:
Chanel Bomber wrote:
nedleeds wrote:
We've never tanked. In fact the number of picks the Knicks have had in the top 5 is pathetic since Ewing. The exact opposite of everything you are saying is true.

Since Ewing we've had THREE god damn top 5 picks. Kenny Walker. KP. R_ Barrett.

Since Ewing here's every team that won a championship and their number of top 5 picks.

Heat have 4 and didn't exist in 1986.
Celts have 5 and one dropped dead.
Cleveland have 9.
GSW have 6. (and Curry and Klay 7 and 11)
Spurs have 4.
Lakers had 4.
Mil had 4.
Raps have 7.
Detroit have 5.
Mavs had 4. (and Dirk at 6)
Hou at 4.
Chi has 8.
Den has 6.

You are either 6 years old or lying.

More often than not agree with you but we did tank in 2018-19. That season was an incredible tank job.

One could argue they also tanked in 2014-15 but they botched it in the end by putting themselves in a position to lose the tiebreaker.

Also the prize was KAT who hasn't exactly blossomed into the superstar he was expected to become. A fair question regarding that is would you be fine having KAT on his current contract on the team or would you view him in the same way you view Brunson and Randle?

To Gravy's point, we tend to over-fantasize about draft position but tanking is far from fail-proof because - Wembies and LeBrons aside - scouting and sheer luck also play a huge role in picking the right player.

Passing on Haliburton in 2020 was a far bigger crime, and that occurred outside the top 5.


Depends on your definition of a tanking franchise but sure. We tanked for 1 year, got RJ and should have just continued tanking. After year 2 it was obvious RJ was never going to be a top 25 player. Instead we signed rotation players like Randle and Morris and won 6 too many games and picked 8th.

When we got KP in the 2015 draft again we should have continued the tank by trying get a 1st for Melo, who played 72 games the following year. Granted Toronto (?) had our pick but still 32-50 is not tanking it's literally the worst place to be in the NBA. I know Melo had a no trade, etc. but again we take the short cut and think we can compete for ... what? Dolans playoff revenue.

I'm looking at this franchise through old 47 year old eyes. We never, ever, tank and bottom out for long enough to get enough swings to find Dirk, or Steph, or get lucky enough to get #1 the year Tim Duncan or LeFlop is available.

We quite literally have the fewest picks in the top 5 in the **** league and it shows in the futility.

As for the KP draft and could we have KAT instead, I think in general it would be a wash, KAT would have been a tank commander, I guess not blown his knee out in year 2? He's have played with Melo that rookie year when Melo was checked out and not playing defense already under Phil / Derek Failure. I think think it's less about KAT/KP or Deangelo Russell than they didn't trade Melo for a 1st and flotsam.

I don't masturbate over the draft, but when you have no top 25 player and no young player that projects to the top 15 what are you doing if you aren't trying in the draft? Treadmilling to mostly no where. Could we have found Kawhi instead of Grimes, Dirk instead of Obi ... sure. Scouting matters but sometimes just lots of picks from 1 to 15 is the other way. Look at what Phoenix had to do just to get Booker, Philly just to get Embiid, Bucks just to get Giannis ... You forget the Bucks picked Jabari Parker, Jimmer, John Henson in that span.

The Knicks plan is an absolute 100% shot to neither

a) get to the Finals
b) get a top 5 pick

and this is why we fail.

Image

Well, they are 100% making things harder for themselves by punting on the draft recently.

But while I get where you're coming from about the endemic failure of this franchise to get top picks since the 1980s, I still think you overvalue the "top 5" pick in this debate. Denver built their core outside the top 5, as did Toronto and Golden State before them.

Scouting and luck play a huge role. Luck is out of your control, but the poor scouting over the years has been more damaging to this franchise than the general unwillingness to tank in my opinion. Because it permeates through every significant decision, such as drafting RJ over Garland, or Obi over Haliburton.

Case in point, if we believe those reports to be true, the Knicks were rumored to like Wiseman at the top of the 2020 draft, if I remember correctly. Winning the lottery only to draft him would have been a disaster. But even if they'd been in a position to land Edwards and make the right call, I still view Haliburton is the better talent, and they had the ability to select him where they were. They didn't.
User avatar
nykfan42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,346
And1: 3,150
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Location: long island

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#74 » by nykfan42 » Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:20 pm

What a mindless thread haha. The team is moving in the right direction after a good year last year with a nice foundational player in Brunson with good young talent as well. Using a Pre-Season game to speak negatively about them is just lazy. Almost all of the time this how the team plays does not translate to regular season good or bad. It's a scrimmage, means nothing.
Make the Knicks great again!
User avatar
nykfan42
Head Coach
Posts: 6,346
And1: 3,150
Joined: Mar 18, 2009
Location: long island

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#75 » by nykfan42 » Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:23 pm

Jose7 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
Jose7 wrote:Watched 4 minutes of the Timberwolves game and saw all I need to see about this team. this year Thibs and Leon will force feed up with Point randle again.its very obvious.

For the second year in a row, I will be box score watching. I've watched the worst of the worst. Randolph Morris, Ime Udoka,Qyntel Woods, Jamison Brewer, Moochie Norris.etc..etc

brunson is too good to let this team be bad unfortunately.. but I am really hoping this team severely under achieves leading to a blow up and rebuild the correct way.

enjoy


I don’t want to see you around here during the playoffs

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewforum.php?f=17


Ive earned my stripes. I can leave for regular season and come back for a playoff run.

I am definitely hoping for a blow up though. Brunson's great. Us locking into the randle stuff not trading him several times over is just a waste of time.

And RJ stinks too.

Watch the Nets bro. Watch a real team that is going NOWHERE.
Make the Knicks great again!
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,055
And1: 8,098
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#76 » by nedleeds » Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:40 pm

Chanel Bomber wrote:Well, they are 100% making things harder for themselves by punting on the draft recently.

But while I get where you're coming from about the endemic failure of this franchise to get top picks since the 1980s, I still think you overvalue the "top 5" pick in this debate. Denver built their core outside the top 5, as did Toronto and Golden State before them.

Scouting and luck play a huge role. Luck is out of your control, but the poor scouting over the years has been more damaging to this franchise than the general unwillingness to tank in my opinion. Because it permeates through every significant decision, such as drafting RJ over Garland, or Obi over Haliburton.

Case in point, if we believe those reports to be true, the Knicks were rumored to like Wiseman at the top of the 2020 draft, if I remember correctly. Winning the lottery only to draft him would have been a disaster. But even if they'd been in a position to land Edwards and make the right call, I still view Haliburton is the better talent, and they had the ability to select him where they were. They didn't.


I agree top 5 is arbitrary. However, it doesn't look any better for the Knicks if you go to 15 or the number of 1st round picks we actually extend and re-sign. It's all some of the worst in sports. Scouting sure matters but it's not everything, number of tries matters quite a bit.

People bring up Jokic. Well Denver didn't actually scout Jokic as elite, they just had a bunch of picks (some from us). They thought Doug McDermont (they picked him #11) into Nurkic and Gary Harris were the gold in that draft. Point is they gave themselves 3 shots. Yeah they are great at scouting, but the next year they picked **** Bootiyay 7th. Recognizing he was not an all-star they used the Knicks pick to get Jamal Murray.

So are Denvers scouts elite? You'd argue yes, but they incinerated the Mudiay pick and several others. But then they knew something about MP Jr. others missed. Denver won a title because they got lots of picks, hit on 2 top 20 players including the Knicks pick (Jamal Murray).

Are our scouts good? No. I'd say average and lately (last 5 years) above average, Mitch was a steal, I.Q. is an NBA rotation player picked late first. Grimes might be a NBA rotation player and he was a late pick. But Obi was a whiff. RJ at 3 was a complete bust.

My point is this franchise never has the stomach to do it right and not stop tanking until a line to a top 15 player is clear. The two worst things to happen recently that derailed it are not trading Carmelo, and the fake Covid regular season where Thibs won coach of the year -- that was a negative 5 year event. Here we are almost no chance at making a finals in the next 3 years and almost no hope of getting a franchise player in the draft.

You just need lots of shots and years to get the 1 or 2 top 15 players. Odds are against it but you also open yourself up to once every ~8 years the absolute home run best player like LeFlop, Duncan, Shaq, Luka (lol Suns), Durant etc.. Nobody on this board *wouldn't* swap rosters with the Spurs or Magic in a heart beat. Because despite them not having a chance to make the finals in the next 3 years they do have players that could be top 15 in 3 years. We don't.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
moocow007
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,271
And1: 25,730
Joined: Jan 07, 2002
Location: In front of the computer, where else?
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#77 » by moocow007 » Mon Oct 23, 2023 4:48 pm

BKlutch wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:STFU AND GTFO

Can we give the the "RJ Barrett is Terrible" treatment?


Barrett is the younger, less talented version of Randle.

***ducks and runs***
User avatar
Jalen Bluntson
RealGM
Posts: 25,620
And1: 27,343
Joined: Nov 07, 2012
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#78 » by Jalen Bluntson » Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:31 pm

moocow007 wrote:
BKlutch wrote:
Jalen Bluntson wrote:STFU AND GTFO

Can we give the the "RJ Barrett is Terrible" treatment?


Barrett is the younger, less talented version of Randle.

***ducks and runs***


Not really less talented. Not much anyway. They are very similar though. I remember when someone first put the idea out there and I didn't agree at all. Then I watched a few games and it started making sense.
:beer: RIP mags
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,055
And1: 8,098
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#79 » by nedleeds » Mon Oct 23, 2023 5:43 pm

Jalen Bluntson wrote:
moocow007 wrote:
BKlutch wrote:Can we give the the "RJ Barrett is Terrible" treatment?


Barrett is the younger, less talented version of Randle.

***ducks and runs***


Not really less talented. Not much anyway. They are very similar though. I remember when someone first put the idea out there and I didn't agree at all. Then I watched a few games and it started making sense.

If Randle was 6' 6" he'd have been out of the league 4 years ago.
If RJ was drafted by a real FO his Gerald Henderson with no vertical ass would have hit restricted free agency this Summer.
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
User avatar
ibraheim718
RealGM
Posts: 41,882
And1: 15,345
Joined: Jul 01, 2010

Re: Your 2023 Knicks..The Epitome of Mid, Boring, Overrated Asset Accumulation led by Point Randle 

Post#80 » by ibraheim718 » Tue Oct 24, 2023 1:09 am

FrozenEnvelope wrote:
Jose7 wrote:
robillionaire wrote:
I don’t want to see you around here during the playoffs

https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewforum.php?f=17


Ive earned my stripes. I can leave for regular season and come back for a playoff run.

I am definitely hoping for a blow up though. Brunson's great. Us locking into the randle stuff not trading him several times over is just a waste of time.

And RJ stinks too.


So you're a casual which means you don't count. Bounce!


Uh he's not a casual. You're just a noob.

Return to New York Knicks