ImageImageImageImageImage

Who do you think should be the next Head Coach?

Moderators: j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#61 » by NoLayupRule » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:38 pm

Context wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:This is so silly

Thibs has the respect and full effort of this team
His staff has consistently taken draft picks to well beyond their expected level, developed players into much superior versions of themselves (Donte, I-hart, duce, precious, hart, even Brunson).

His roster isn’t his making.
This team may need another trade cycle or two to get where it needs.

Come next season we won’t be under the restrictions we are now.

This team suffers from lack of quality depth.
Thibs trys to win every game.
That apparently means playing our starters way too much

With Payne, precious and even shamet we will see less mins for the starters

so that means he's not responsible for just playing 6 players when we have 73 games to go?

thats not my point at all

hes not responsible for the team losing I-Hart and Devo and the entire way he coached them to be last year
hes not responsible for KAT being here and the major defensive step back weve taken
hes not responsible for the lack of depth thats leading to this messed up rotation
hes not responsible - YET - for injuries

point is hes working with what he has and outside of our starting 5 plus Duce and Precious, Payne and Shamet we dont have a lot to realistically play in competitive games vs good teams like Cavs, Pacers and Houston
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#62 » by NoLayupRule » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:46 pm

JayTWill wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:This is so silly

Thibs has the respect and full effort of this team
His staff has consistently taken draft picks to well beyond their expected level, developed players into much superior versions of themselves (Donte, I-hart, duce, precious, hart, even Brunson).

His roster isn’t his making.
This team may need another trade cycle or two to get where it needs.

Come next season we won’t be under the restrictions we are now.

This team suffers from lack of quality depth.
Thibs trys to win every game.
That apparently means playing our starters way too much

With Payne, precious and even shamet we will see less mins for the starters


I have never really agreed with this narrative around Thibs about his developmental skills. I feel like he is given a little too much credit from some for players being who they have previously been or exceeding lower expectations that fans have had for some players.

Donte was a great college player that was trending upward in the league until he got injured and had a down year. He had a great season in Golden State and continued it in New York on a larger scale. I don't think there was anything unique to Thibs and his staff that made Donte play the way he played last year other than possibly the freedom to jack up shots and play a lot of minutes.

iHart showed the same capabilities he had in New York prior to his arrival here and he actually said he had more to offer than he showed here when he left. The scouting report on Deuce coming out of college was that he was a defensive minded guard with an improved jump shot and questionable point guard skills. He may have struggled for a bit his first few years but he has become exactly that.

Precious is Precious. I'm not as high on him as others. He looks like the same guy I saw in Toronto just taking less threes. Hart has been Hart for years. Brunson is Brunson on a larger stage with a larger opportunity imo.

I see a coach that can push his guys to compete hard for as long as possible but i'm sure I see much outlier development. I don't see non-defenders becoming defenders. I don't see non-shooters becoming shooters. I'm not seeing poor ball handlers becoming great ball handlers. I actually feel like the way he may raise the floor and lower the ceiling for his teams is the same thing he does for players.

What unexpected developments have you seen from many of his players that you would attribute to him and his staff?

Id say the player development side of things is too consistant a plus to ignore

sure Ihart and Devo showed they could play like this. or that their ceiling was what we got for them.
But at the same time Devo and Ihart were exception contracts who are now top of their position. Not literally top but Ihart is the starting center, when he returns, for the best team in basketball (arguably) and Devo is leading the league in 3s, or did last year


but even if we discount them we cant ignore quickly & duce, even Randle and Brunson
Quick and Duce were as unheralded as players can be and now both are very much on the radar of the coaches and fans

Randle would never have been thought of as an all-nba player before NY and then made it twice
Brunson was famously denied a 30mil contract and then laughed over his current one. Now hes all nba and mvp level.

its not one guy I need to point to but the fact that all the guys are playing higher than previously expected of them.
Hart is another good example.

But sure, he demands more and they give more. that could be the narrative.
Or we could look at Cam Reddish and Toppin and their lack of success here.
But I dont think they have proven to be any better since they left.

Grimes is an example of a really good player for us whos now not really making an impact.
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#63 » by NoLayupRule » Tue Nov 12, 2024 10:47 pm

B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:...

Come next season we won’t be under the restrictions we are now.

...

Interesting to know. :o

Next off season the Knicks will have 7 players under contract who aren't rookies this year. (KAT, OG, Bridges, Brunson, Mitch, Hart and Deuce.) Maybe they can squeeze under the second apron (decline Hukporti's team option per Spotrac). Then they can trade some of those 7 for 125% of their salary and ... depth? ... Giannis? ... ?

I looks to me as though the Knicks will require more heroic work from Brock Aller next year.

cap is going up, i believe, in a significant way

or thats what Ive heard
User avatar
Besart19
RealGM
Posts: 13,787
And1: 5,055
Joined: Feb 12, 2012
Location: Dibra, Albania
   

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#64 » by Besart19 » Tue Nov 12, 2024 11:02 pm

Head coach: Bryant
top assistants: Wright (offense), Woodson (defense), Wallace (bigs), Brunson (guards), Carmelo (wings)
Strength and Honour!
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,673
And1: 1,756
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#65 » by JayTWill » Tue Nov 12, 2024 11:49 pm

NoLayupRule wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:This is so silly

Thibs has the respect and full effort of this team
His staff has consistently taken draft picks to well beyond their expected level, developed players into much superior versions of themselves (Donte, I-hart, duce, precious, hart, even Brunson).

His roster isn’t his making.
This team may need another trade cycle or two to get where it needs.

Come next season we won’t be under the restrictions we are now.

This team suffers from lack of quality depth.
Thibs trys to win every game.
That apparently means playing our starters way too much

With Payne, precious and even shamet we will see less mins for the starters


I have never really agreed with this narrative around Thibs about his developmental skills. I feel like he is given a little too much credit from some for players being who they have previously been or exceeding lower expectations that fans have had for some players.

Donte was a great college player that was trending upward in the league until he got injured and had a down year. He had a great season in Golden State and continued it in New York on a larger scale. I don't think there was anything unique to Thibs and his staff that made Donte play the way he played last year other than possibly the freedom to jack up shots and play a lot of minutes.

iHart showed the same capabilities he had in New York prior to his arrival here and he actually said he had more to offer than he showed here when he left. The scouting report on Deuce coming out of college was that he was a defensive minded guard with an improved jump shot and questionable point guard skills. He may have struggled for a bit his first few years but he has become exactly that.

Precious is Precious. I'm not as high on him as others. He looks like the same guy I saw in Toronto just taking less threes. Hart has been Hart for years. Brunson is Brunson on a larger stage with a larger opportunity imo.

I see a coach that can push his guys to compete hard for as long as possible but i'm sure I see much outlier development. I don't see non-defenders becoming defenders. I don't see non-shooters becoming shooters. I'm not seeing poor ball handlers becoming great ball handlers. I actually feel like the way he may raise the floor and lower the ceiling for his teams is the same thing he does for players.

What unexpected developments have you seen from many of his players that you would attribute to him and his staff?

Id say the player development side of things is too consistant a plus to ignore

sure Ihart and Devo showed they could play like this. or that their ceiling was what we got for them.
But at the same time Devo and Ihart were exception contracts who are now top of their position. Not literally top but Ihart is the starting center, when he returns, for the best team in basketball (arguably) and Devo is leading the league in 3s, or did last year


but even if we discount them we cant ignore quickly & duce, even Randle and Brunson
Quick and Duce were as unheralded as players can be and now both are very much on the radar of the coaches and fans

Randle would never have been thought of as an all-nba player before NY and then made it twice
Brunson was famously denied a 30mil contract and then laughed over his current one. Now hes all nba and mvp level.

its not one guy I need to point to but the fact that all the guys are playing higher than previously expected of them.
Hart is another good example.

But sure, he demands more and they give more. that could be the narrative.
Or we could look at Cam Reddish and Toppin and their lack of success here.
But I dont think they have proven to be any better since they left.

Grimes is an example of a really good player for us whos now not really making an impact.


I was referring more to skill development. The Knicks have definitely had some guys whose status grew under Thibs but some of that was just opportunity and the New York media attention. I would be a little more impressed with his ability to develop players if he and his staff somehow turned Hart into a consistent 3 point shooter or turned KAT into a good rim protector or if Brunson turned into an above average on-ball defender or turned Deuce into a more natural point guard.

If the Knicks trade for someone like Kessler and all of sudden he is playing 30-35 minutes while continuing block a ton of shots while still having a limited offensive game but now his name is in the all defensive team conversation because he is in New York on hopefully a winning team does Thibs get credit for developing Kessler even though he would be the same exact player he was in Utah?

I'm not saying no one has improved under Thibs. There have also been guys that have played well above my expectations but some of that is because I knew nothing about their skillsets. Deuce being a good shooter was shocking to me but I didn't know he was a good shooter when he left college or in the G-League. I just saw him in limited spurts in his first few years and I was unimpressed but a good shooter being a good shooter should not be an unexpected development. I simply had not paid enough attention to him before last January.

I guess I would give Thibs credit for helping some guys to reach their floor potential which is not always a given but there aren't many guys that have come through him that I don't think would have reached these levels without him if given the same chance under another coach.
B8RcDeMktfxC
General Manager
Posts: 9,667
And1: 6,486
Joined: Nov 23, 2018
Location: C'MON, COME GET THE FUKKIN BALL

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#66 » by B8RcDeMktfxC » Wed Nov 13, 2024 1:46 am

NoLayupRule wrote:
B8RcDeMktfxC wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:...

Come next season we won’t be under the restrictions we are now.

...

Interesting to know. :o

Next off season the Knicks will have 7 players under contract who aren't rookies this year. (KAT, OG, Bridges, Brunson, Mitch, Hart and Deuce.) Maybe they can squeeze under the second apron (decline Hukporti's team option per Spotrac). Then they can trade some of those 7 for 125% of their salary and ... depth? ... Giannis? ... ?

I looks to me as though the Knicks will require more heroic work from Brock Aller next year.

cap is going up, i believe, in a significant way

or thats what Ive heard

The salary cap is projected to be $154,647,000 - a 10% increase on this year's. That's the maximum allowed under the "new" (2023) CBA. The first apron is expected to be $195,946,000 and the second apron $207,825,000.

You can see the Knicks salary commitments here: https://www.spotrac.com/nba/new-york-knicks/overview/_/year/2025 - the salaries of the 10 player roster, including Hukporti's $1,955,377, is $196,310,224.

(I obviously meant the first apron in my previous post, sorry about that.)

(I'm also not sure why Spotrac is adding an additional IRC to the Knicks commitments re the aprons - bumping it up to $198,855,622 - I was very sure teams didn't need to do that this 2024-2025 year. Either way it gives the Knicks about $11.5m to pay four roster spots if they don't want to go over the second apron. The vet min would be $2,296,274.)
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,793
And1: 4,711
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#67 » by The KnicksFix » Wed Nov 13, 2024 2:18 am

Please for the love of God give me Jay Wright
User avatar
NoLayupRule
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 48,099
And1: 11,028
Joined: Dec 06, 2002
Location: Playoffs Fool!
Contact:

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#68 » by NoLayupRule » Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:11 am

JayTWill wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
I have never really agreed with this narrative around Thibs about his developmental skills. I feel like he is given a little too much credit from some for players being who they have previously been or exceeding lower expectations that fans have had for some players.

Donte was a great college player that was trending upward in the league until he got injured and had a down year. He had a great season in Golden State and continued it in New York on a larger scale. I don't think there was anything unique to Thibs and his staff that made Donte play the way he played last year other than possibly the freedom to jack up shots and play a lot of minutes.

iHart showed the same capabilities he had in New York prior to his arrival here and he actually said he had more to offer than he showed here when he left. The scouting report on Deuce coming out of college was that he was a defensive minded guard with an improved jump shot and questionable point guard skills. He may have struggled for a bit his first few years but he has become exactly that.

Precious is Precious. I'm not as high on him as others. He looks like the same guy I saw in Toronto just taking less threes. Hart has been Hart for years. Brunson is Brunson on a larger stage with a larger opportunity imo.

I see a coach that can push his guys to compete hard for as long as possible but i'm sure I see much outlier development. I don't see non-defenders becoming defenders. I don't see non-shooters becoming shooters. I'm not seeing poor ball handlers becoming great ball handlers. I actually feel like the way he may raise the floor and lower the ceiling for his teams is the same thing he does for players.

What unexpected developments have you seen from many of his players that you would attribute to him and his staff?

Id say the player development side of things is too consistant a plus to ignore

sure Ihart and Devo showed they could play like this. or that their ceiling was what we got for them.
But at the same time Devo and Ihart were exception contracts who are now top of their position. Not literally top but Ihart is the starting center, when he returns, for the best team in basketball (arguably) and Devo is leading the league in 3s, or did last year


but even if we discount them we cant ignore quickly & duce, even Randle and Brunson
Quick and Duce were as unheralded as players can be and now both are very much on the radar of the coaches and fans

Randle would never have been thought of as an all-nba player before NY and then made it twice
Brunson was famously denied a 30mil contract and then laughed over his current one. Now hes all nba and mvp level.

its not one guy I need to point to but the fact that all the guys are playing higher than previously expected of them.
Hart is another good example.

But sure, he demands more and they give more. that could be the narrative.
Or we could look at Cam Reddish and Toppin and their lack of success here.
But I dont think they have proven to be any better since they left.

Grimes is an example of a really good player for us whos now not really making an impact.


I was referring more to skill development. The Knicks have definitely had some guys whose status grew under Thibs but some of that was just opportunity and the New York media attention. I would be a little more impressed with his ability to develop players if he and his staff somehow turned Hart into a consistent 3 point shooter or turned KAT into a good rim protector or if Brunson turned into an above average on-ball defender or turned Deuce into a more natural point guard.

If the Knicks trade for someone like Kessler and all of sudden he is playing 30-35 minutes while continuing block a ton of shots while still having a limited offensive game but now his name is in the all defensive team conversation because he is in New York on hopefully a winning team does Thibs get credit for developing Kessler even though he would be the same exact player he was in Utah?

I'm not saying no one has improved under Thibs. There have also been guys that have played well above my expectations but some of that is because I knew nothing about their skillsets. Deuce being a good shooter was shocking to me but I didn't know he was a good shooter when he left college or in the G-League. I just saw him in limited spurts in his first few years and I was unimpressed but a good shooter being a good shooter should not be an unexpected development. I simply had not paid enough attention to him before last January.

I guess I would give Thibs credit for helping some guys to reach their floor potential which is not always a given but there aren't many guys that have come through him that I don't think would have reached these levels without him if given the same chance under another coach.

its one thing to take a player's per30 min average conceptually and its quite another to get that player to actually hit that number

i think its more than just playing time and media focus personally

even if its as simple as getting players to give their everything while they are on the floor vs some coaches who dont inspire.
even if thats all it is its significant IMO

but I think its more.

Hart was a good rebounding guard who got traded and moved several times, never fitting anywhere.
Now hes a player 30 teams would want on their roster and has a more well rounded game. Got a triple double tonight.

I honestly think he gets players to play up to their highest potential
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 40,188
And1: 57,741
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#69 » by robillionaire » Wed Nov 13, 2024 3:17 am

Thibs until he doesn’t wanna do it anymore and hangs it up
JayTWill
Veteran
Posts: 2,673
And1: 1,756
Joined: May 14, 2011

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#70 » by JayTWill » Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:31 am

NoLayupRule wrote:
JayTWill wrote:
NoLayupRule wrote:Id say the player development side of things is too consistant a plus to ignore

sure Ihart and Devo showed they could play like this. or that their ceiling was what we got for them.
But at the same time Devo and Ihart were exception contracts who are now top of their position. Not literally top but Ihart is the starting center, when he returns, for the best team in basketball (arguably) and Devo is leading the league in 3s, or did last year


but even if we discount them we cant ignore quickly & duce, even Randle and Brunson
Quick and Duce were as unheralded as players can be and now both are very much on the radar of the coaches and fans

Randle would never have been thought of as an all-nba player before NY and then made it twice
Brunson was famously denied a 30mil contract and then laughed over his current one. Now hes all nba and mvp level.

its not one guy I need to point to but the fact that all the guys are playing higher than previously expected of them.
Hart is another good example.

But sure, he demands more and they give more. that could be the narrative.
Or we could look at Cam Reddish and Toppin and their lack of success here.
But I dont think they have proven to be any better since they left.

Grimes is an example of a really good player for us whos now not really making an impact.


I was referring more to skill development. The Knicks have definitely had some guys whose status grew under Thibs but some of that was just opportunity and the New York media attention. I would be a little more impressed with his ability to develop players if he and his staff somehow turned Hart into a consistent 3 point shooter or turned KAT into a good rim protector or if Brunson turned into an above average on-ball defender or turned Deuce into a more natural point guard.

If the Knicks trade for someone like Kessler and all of sudden he is playing 30-35 minutes while continuing block a ton of shots while still having a limited offensive game but now his name is in the all defensive team conversation because he is in New York on hopefully a winning team does Thibs get credit for developing Kessler even though he would be the same exact player he was in Utah?

I'm not saying no one has improved under Thibs. There have also been guys that have played well above my expectations but some of that is because I knew nothing about their skillsets. Deuce being a good shooter was shocking to me but I didn't know he was a good shooter when he left college or in the G-League. I just saw him in limited spurts in his first few years and I was unimpressed but a good shooter being a good shooter should not be an unexpected development. I simply had not paid enough attention to him before last January.

I guess I would give Thibs credit for helping some guys to reach their floor potential which is not always a given but there aren't many guys that have come through him that I don't think would have reached these levels without him if given the same chance under another coach.

its one thing to take a player's per30 min average conceptually and its quite another to get that player to actually hit that number

i think its more than just playing time and media focus personally

even if its as simple as getting players to give their everything while they are on the floor vs some coaches who dont inspire.
even if thats all it is its significant IMO

but I think its more.

Hart was a good rebounding guard who got traded and moved several times, never fitting anywhere.
Now hes a player 30 teams would want on their roster and has a more well rounded game. Got a triple double tonight.

I honestly think he gets players to play up to their highest potential


Josh Hart's last year in Portland
33.4mpg 9.5ppg 3.9apg 8.2rpg 50.4FG% 30.4 3PT% 73.1 FT% 58.6 TS%
Josh Hart last season in New York
33.4mpg 9.5ppg 4.1apg 8.3rpg 43.4FG% 31.0 3PT% 79.1 FT% 52.2 TS%

Hart has been putting up similar numbers for years except he had his least efficient shooting season of his career last season which I don't blame him for. He has been the same player for years from the rebounding to the inconsistent 3 point shooting to the aggressiveness in transition to the frustrating turning down of open shots looking to create for others to the head scratching plays to the winning plays. Portland fans seemed to love him the same way Knicks fans love him and had the same frustrations with his game at times.

We will just have to agree to disagree that Thibs has played a significant role in his development. 30 teams wanted Hart on their roster before he got to New York. That is part of the reason he has already played for 4 of them.
seren
RealGM
Posts: 24,720
And1: 4,948
Joined: Jul 21, 2002

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#71 » by seren » Wed Nov 13, 2024 5:08 am

Jerry Stackhouse
nedleeds
General Manager
Posts: 9,044
And1: 8,091
Joined: Dec 25, 2016
Location: Bridgeport, NY
Contact:
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#72 » by nedleeds » Wed Nov 13, 2024 5:30 am

Image
Zenzibar wrote:Nevertheless, Payton is not a finished product yet and unless the team moves him in a couple of weeks, I anticipate him trending upward with this coaching staff.
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,793
And1: 4,711
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#73 » by The KnicksFix » Thu Nov 14, 2024 5:01 am

Yet another game where Thibs has a brain fart and leaves Brunson in the game… bum of a coach
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,171
And1: 2,365
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#74 » by NoStatsGuy » Thu Nov 14, 2024 11:36 am

we are not gonna find a better coach than thibs. wether you like it or not
im bout dat action boss
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 35,133
And1: 36,209
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#75 » by Fat Kat » Sat Nov 23, 2024 3:44 pm

Read on Twitter
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,793
And1: 4,711
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#76 » by The KnicksFix » Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:08 am

Fat Kat wrote:
Read on Twitter


Dedicates his life to us on drop coverage instead of switching… yea, we’re f***ed
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,793
And1: 4,711
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#77 » by The KnicksFix » Sun Nov 24, 2024 10:09 am

NoStatsGuy wrote:we are not gonna find a better coach than thibs. wether you like it or not


Kenny Atkinson would have had this team rolling
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,171
And1: 2,365
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#78 » by NoStatsGuy » Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:19 am

The KnicksFix wrote:
NoStatsGuy wrote:we are not gonna find a better coach than thibs. wether you like it or not


Kenny Atkinson would have had this team rolling


as far as i know kenny atkinson is coaching and paid by another team. so hes not on the market for coaches to get. we can dream and fantasize about coaches of course but i like to keep it realistic. And there are just no better coaches, that we could realistically get.

we would have to gamble on one, and im not a fan of that. we gotta hope we stay healthy, thats just how it is.
im bout dat action boss
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,793
And1: 4,711
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#79 » by The KnicksFix » Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:26 am

NoStatsGuy wrote:
The KnicksFix wrote:
NoStatsGuy wrote:we are not gonna find a better coach than thibs. wether you like it or not


Kenny Atkinson would have had this team rolling


as far as i know kenny atkinson is coaching and paid by another team. so hes not on the market for coaches to get. we can dream and fantasize about coaches of course but i like to keep it realistic. And there are just no better coaches, that we could realistically get.

we would have to gamble on one, and im not a fan of that. we gotta hope we stay healthy, thats just how it is.


You like to keep it realistic? Well here’s this for you. Thibs will never win you a ring. He had a friggin MVP and couldn’t do it, there are better coaches out there, have a look across the river. Fernandez has that Net team playing far above their capability. You think there are no other capable coaches across the world? lol, if you can’t drive the keys to a Ferrari, gtfo and hand it to someone who can.
The KnicksFix
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,793
And1: 4,711
Joined: Oct 28, 2011
       

Re: Who do you think should be the next Head Coach? 

Post#80 » by The KnicksFix » Sun Nov 24, 2024 11:29 am

NoStatsGuy wrote:
The KnicksFix wrote:
NoStatsGuy wrote:we are not gonna find a better coach than thibs. wether you like it or not


Kenny Atkinson would have had this team rolling


as far as i know kenny atkinson is coaching and paid by another team. so hes not on the market for coaches to get. we can dream and fantasize about coaches of course but i like to keep it realistic. And there are just no better coaches, that we could realistically get.

we would have to gamble on one, and im not a fan of that. we gotta hope we stay healthy, thats just how it is.


You like to keep it realistic? How about this as well, the injuries have piled up under Thibs, at no point in watching the Knicks for 30 years have i seen so many injured players, and definitely not 3 so early in the season. And only 6 players in the playoffs, You think thats just due to luck or attrition? Lmao, you want to be realistic right?

Return to New York Knicks