berkkobe7 wrote:NoLayupRule wrote:I think the biggest difference between today's players and yesteryear's in Todays advantage is size and athleticism. 6-8 SGs, 6-4 PGs, 7foot sfs. You have an athleticism that's no where close to then. In part because of the body and diet training and conditioning that didn't exist then.
However players of previous generations had massive advantages in fundamentals, physicality and defense. No one practically in today's generation - Duncan an obvious exception - has fundamental understanding of the game like the players used to. Also defense was so tight on the perimeter that guys like curry would struggle to get their shots.
But superstars would always have been superstars. Kobe, LeBron, dirk etc.
It's guys like Howard who wouldn't have been nearly as effective back in the day.
Do you think Melo can be a superstar or one tier below in every era of basketball?
my definition of superstar is different than most I think
However I think Melo can be a Gervin level superstar
or Drexler perhaps
even Barkley level
hes an unstoppable scorer, very very good rebounder and average defender and passer. He's not below average at anything. I don't think he's good enough to win all by himself but then again I don't know who is. no one it seems.
Id say he is in the same level as anyone in todays NBA minus LBJ who is just so complete that its scary, and potentially Davis and the Greek Freak who might change the way the game is played. Durant, Kobe, Rose, George, Paul, Harden, Dirk, LMA, etc are all as good as him within shades of his level but everyone of them, minus Kobe now, has much more quality around them





















