ImageImageImageImageImage

Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals

Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36

Who makes it to the finals?

Blazers
2
2%
Warriors
58
45%
Bucks
34
27%
Raps
34
27%
 
Total votes: 128

User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,097
And1: 67,824
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#701 » by F N 11 » Fri May 24, 2019 1:36 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
F N 11 wrote:That’s interesting. From my learning most fear is just a product of your subconscious and you can choose to say fuq it and change gear. I get what you are saying tho.


This is a completely different thing. You can overcome a lot in terms of fear and every great climber has been able to do that in ways most people can't even imagine. And Hannold is to them what they seem like to everyone else. Hannold can do things that would be easy technically for climbers like Chris Sharma or Adam Ondra but they are unable to submit themselves to that sort of risk factor. Hannold is conscious of the risks but can approach them 100% pragmatically because he never had fear to begin with.


As an aside, not related to your quote, but more to the above, I don't buy that fear is all about the subconscious. I doubt you guys do either. I'm certainly no expert, but feels like there are a number of evolutionary responses that help towards generating fear that are kind of/sort of hardwire us towards certain fears and then socially, other fears get either layered over them, attached to them, or we have a predilection to adding to the subconscious alongside them, because of that wiring - take a pick as to what seems most likely or what the research says, as this is something I've thought about or read about only indirectly, as opposed to deep diving.

OR, fear IS all about the subconscious, if the subconscious is comprised of both innate biological functions combined with socially learned ones. Which may be both of your understanding of the subconscious function in this case, or even the accepted understanding of it - I'm just a layman here. :D

Also, the Bucks choked :D

Look man! If your parents were bad with money you grow up to be bad with money. It is until you tap into better habits and power of the mind you grow. That's why I don't even get mad at insults by people because i know mentally they have issues. They are mad at you but they are really mad at themselves. I'm a believer in the subconscious is your reality. When you realize all you have to do is change your conscious mind its amazing the things you can get over. You can override your subconscious by pounding new information or the thoughts you want.
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
thebuzzardman
RealGM
Posts: 81,701
And1: 95,505
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: Villanovknicks

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#702 » by thebuzzardman » Fri May 24, 2019 1:42 pm

F N 11 wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
This is a completely different thing. You can overcome a lot in terms of fear and every great climber has been able to do that in ways most people can't even imagine. And Hannold is to them what they seem like to everyone else. Hannold can do things that would be easy technically for climbers like Chris Sharma or Adam Ondra but they are unable to submit themselves to that sort of risk factor. Hannold is conscious of the risks but can approach them 100% pragmatically because he never had fear to begin with.


As an aside, not related to your quote, but more to the above, I don't buy that fear is all about the subconscious. I doubt you guys do either. I'm certainly no expert, but feels like there are a number of evolutionary responses that help towards generating fear that are kind of/sort of hardwire us towards certain fears and then socially, other fears get either layered over them, attached to them, or we have a predilection to adding to the subconscious alongside them, because of that wiring - take a pick as to what seems most likely or what the research says, as this is something I've thought about or read about only indirectly, as opposed to deep diving.

OR, fear IS all about the subconscious, if the subconscious is comprised of both innate biological functions combined with socially learned ones. Which may be both of your understanding of the subconscious function in this case, or even the accepted understanding of it - I'm just a layman here. :D

Also, the Bucks choked :D

Look man! If your parents were bad with money you grow up to be bad with money. It is until you tap into better habits and power of the mind you grow. That's why I don't even get mad at insults by people because i know mentally they have issues. They are mad at you but they are really mad at themselves. I'm a believer in the subconscious is your reality. When you realize all you have to do is change your conscious mind its amazing the things you can get over. You can override your subconscious by pounding new information or the thoughts you want.


I agree. I was just pointing out that society (and that would include parents) help to program that subconscious. Someone could have really open minded, non racist parents, for instance, and while that would be very helpful, they could still absorb elements of racism into their subconscious if the society at large constantly peddled it and it was already accepted by a majority of people. Obviously, as someone comes into being of age/their more independent mind, they have a chance to overcome it. With effort.

I guess I'm making some kind of nature AND nurture statement. But I was in agreement from the jump, kind of making an observation off your observations, if you will
Image
User avatar
F N 11
RealGM
Posts: 95,097
And1: 67,824
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Location: Getting over screens with Gusto.
Contact:
 

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#703 » by F N 11 » Fri May 24, 2019 2:03 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
F N 11 wrote:
thebuzzardman wrote:
As an aside, not related to your quote, but more to the above, I don't buy that fear is all about the subconscious. I doubt you guys do either. I'm certainly no expert, but feels like there are a number of evolutionary responses that help towards generating fear that are kind of/sort of hardwire us towards certain fears and then socially, other fears get either layered over them, attached to them, or we have a predilection to adding to the subconscious alongside them, because of that wiring - take a pick as to what seems most likely or what the research says, as this is something I've thought about or read about only indirectly, as opposed to deep diving.

OR, fear IS all about the subconscious, if the subconscious is comprised of both innate biological functions combined with socially learned ones. Which may be both of your understanding of the subconscious function in this case, or even the accepted understanding of it - I'm just a layman here. :D

Also, the Bucks choked :D

Look man! If your parents were bad with money you grow up to be bad with money. It is until you tap into better habits and power of the mind you grow. That's why I don't even get mad at insults by people because i know mentally they have issues. They are mad at you but they are really mad at themselves. I'm a believer in the subconscious is your reality. When you realize all you have to do is change your conscious mind its amazing the things you can get over. You can override your subconscious by pounding new information or the thoughts you want.


I agree. I was just pointing out that society (and that would include parents) help to program that subconscious. Someone could have really open minded, non racist parents, for instance, and while that would be very helpful, they could still absorb elements of racism into their subconscious if the society at large constantly peddled it and it was already accepted by a majority of people. Obviously, as someone comes into being of age/their more independent mind, they have a chance to overcome it. With effort.

I guess I'm making some kind of nature AND nurture statement. But I was in agreement from the jump, kind of making an observation off your observations, if you will


The biggest problem is people do not think. Its fuqing crazy how mentally trapped most people are. When i woke up I was like wtf!!!
CEO of the not trading RJ Club
User avatar
HerSports85
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 21,767
And1: 35,351
Joined: Dec 22, 2011

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#704 » by HerSports85 » Fri May 24, 2019 2:20 pm

Read on Twitter
BAF: Chicago Bulls
23-24 In-season tournament Champs
User avatar
Fury
RealGM
Posts: 24,674
And1: 18,598
Joined: Mar 07, 2007
       

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#705 » by Fury » Fri May 24, 2019 2:22 pm

HerSports85 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Never forget the cucks that were rooting for the Cavs over the Warriors
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,498
And1: 30,616
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#706 » by Jeff Van Gully » Fri May 24, 2019 2:31 pm

HerSports85 wrote:
Read on Twitter


he has always been such a dick. never liked.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,567
And1: 5,711
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#707 » by spree2kawhi » Fri May 24, 2019 2:31 pm

GONYK wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
SelbyCobra wrote:Watch this man get told he's lost $31 million...by the very people who took it from him. This is a pretty heavy moment. :lol:

Read on Twitter


It's disrespectful to him. Imagine Walker on the Warriors instead of Klay. It's just not the same animal. That team (without KD) may not even advance versus Portland. It shows you how narrow minded some of those journalists are. They don't see what he does. Most of what they know about Klay seems to be only the narrative of a two way player. They don't understand those intangibles because they watch the ball.


Journalists voting for something that high stakes is stupid

Seriously why journalists at all? 31 million at stake for Thompson and those dudes often don't know ****.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,567
And1: 5,711
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#708 » by spree2kawhi » Fri May 24, 2019 2:44 pm

Fury wrote:
HerSports85 wrote:
Read on Twitter


Never forget the cucks that were rooting for the Cavs over the Warriors

LeBron winning a championship is like the Trump presidency of basketball.
User avatar
Jeff Van Gully
Forum Mod - Knicks
Forum Mod - Knicks
Posts: 30,498
And1: 30,616
Joined: Jul 31, 2010
     

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#709 » by Jeff Van Gully » Fri May 24, 2019 2:45 pm

spree2kawhi wrote:
GONYK wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
It's disrespectful to him. Imagine Walker on the Warriors instead of Klay. It's just not the same animal. That team (without KD) may not even advance versus Portland. It shows you how narrow minded some of those journalists are. They don't see what he does. Most of what they know about Klay seems to be only the narrative of a two way player. They don't understand those intangibles because they watch the ball.


Journalists voting for something that high stakes is stupid

Seriously why journalists at all? 31 million at stake for Thompson and those dudes often don't know ****.


i think y'all are aiming at the wrong target. why did the NBA and NBAPA collectively bargain to allow supermax contracts to be determined by this? voters can't be thinking about who deserves a supermax or not -- you would hope.
RIP magnumt

thanks for everything, thibs.

Knicks Forum: State of the Board - Summer 2025
avatar by evevale
User avatar
god shammgod
RealGM
Posts: 138,175
And1: 136,625
Joined: Feb 18, 2006

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#710 » by god shammgod » Fri May 24, 2019 2:54 pm

Jeff Van Gully wrote:
spree2kawhi wrote:
GONYK wrote:
Journalists voting for something that high stakes is stupid

Seriously why journalists at all? 31 million at stake for Thompson and those dudes often don't know ****.


i think y'all are aiming at the wrong target. why did the NBA and NBAPA collectively bargain to allow supermax contracts to be determined by this? voters can't be thinking about who deserves a supermax or not -- you would hope.


they should have just given teams the ability to supermax 1 player, and 1 player only, and have only the regular max count against the cap. that's how you create parity which they claim they want. nobody can afford 2 super maxes anyway.
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,327
And1: 110,236
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#711 » by Capn'O » Fri May 24, 2019 3:09 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
F N 11 wrote:That’s interesting. From my learning most fear is just a product of your subconscious and you can choose to say fuq it and change gear. I get what you are saying tho.


This is a completely different thing. You can overcome a lot in terms of fear and every great climber has been able to do that in ways most people can't even imagine. And Hannold is to them what they seem like to everyone else. Hannold can do things that would be easy technically for climbers like Chris Sharma or Adam Ondra but they are unable to submit themselves to that sort of risk factor. Hannold is conscious of the risks but can approach them 100% pragmatically because he never had fear to begin with.


As an aside, not related to your quote, but more to the above, I don't buy that fear is all about the subconscious. I doubt you guys do either. I'm certainly no expert, but feels like there are a number of evolutionary responses that help towards generating fear that are kind of/sort of hardwire us towards certain fears and then socially, other fears get either layered over them, attached to them, or we have a predilection to adding to the subconscious alongside them, because of that wiring - take a pick as to what seems most likely or what the research says, as this is something I've thought about or read about only indirectly, as opposed to deep diving.

OR, fear IS all about the subconscious, if the subconscious is comprised of both innate biological functions combined with socially learned ones. Which may be both of your understanding of the subconscious function in this case, or even the accepted understanding of it - I'm just a layman here. :D

Also, the Bucks choked :D


A little of Column A and a little of Column B???
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
SelbyCobra
RealGM
Posts: 10,462
And1: 20,551
Joined: May 25, 2011

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#712 » by SelbyCobra » Fri May 24, 2019 3:10 pm

Capn'O wrote:
SelbyCobra wrote:Kawhi is definitely in the same brain chemistry/on the spectrum/mental health situation that Alex Honnold is. This stuff doesn't register to him the same way it does to normal human beings. The way he responds to figure of speech questions with literal answers is exactly the same. I'd wager if he had the same brain scan that Honnold did it would show very similar results.

Being that talented AND having his brain wired that way is absolutely terrifying as a fan of a team that doesn't have Kawhi Leonard on it.


That is a great comparison. Do you climb?


Not like you want me to if I answered yes. I go casually indoors. My kids love it though, and we actually go to the gym where Honnold learned to climb and train.

Here's a little more detail for anyone curious about the difference between learning to control your fear consciously, and the sort of genetic mutation that Honnold has which allows him to operate without the same mental restrictions most other humans have. They actually used a fellow climber as the control for the experiment, and he said similar things to Honnold about not having fear or reactions, but the scans showed wildly different results internally.

http://nautil.us/issue/39/sport/the-strange-brain-of-the-worlds-greatest-solo-climber

“I’m excited to see what his brain looks like,” she says, sitting in the control room behind leaded glass as the scan begins. “Then we’ll just check what his amygdala is doing, to see: Does he really have no fear?”

Often referred to as the brain’s fear center, the amygdala is more precisely the center of a threat response and interpretation system. It receives information on a straight pathway from our senses, which allows us to, for example, step back from an unexpected precipice without a moment’s conscious thought, and triggers a roster of other bodily responses familiar to almost everyone: racing heartbeat, sweaty palms, tunnel vision, loss of appetite. Meanwhile, the amygdala sends information up the line for higher processing in the cortical structures of the brain, where it may be translated into the conscious emotion we call fear.


Inside the tube, Honnold is looking at a series of about 200 images that flick past at the speed of channel surfing. The photographs are meant to disturb or excite. “At least in non-Alex people, these would evoke a strong response in the amygdala,” says Joseph. “I can’t bear to look at some of them, to be honest.” The selection includes corpses with their facial features bloodily reorganized; a toilet choked with feces; a woman shaving herself, Brazilian style; and two invigorating mountain-climbing scenes.

“Maybe his amygdala is not firing—he’s having no internal reactions to these stimuli,” says Joseph. “But it could be the case that he has such a well-honed regulatory system that he can say, ‘OK, I’m feeling all this stuff, my amygdala is going off,’ but his frontal cortex is just so powerful that it can calm him down.”

There is also a more existential question. “Why does he do this?” she says. “He knows it’s life-threatening—I’m sure people tell him every day. So there may be some kind of really strong reward, like the thrill of it is very rewarding.”

To find out, Honnold is now running through a second experiment, the “reward task,” in the scanner. He can win or lose small amounts of money (the most he can win is $22) depending on how quickly he clicks a button when signaled. “It’s a task that we know activates the reward circuitry very strongly in the rest of us,” Joseph says.

In this case, she’s looking most closely at another brain apparatus, the nucleus accumbens, located not far from the amygdala (which is also at play in the reward circuitry) near the top of the brainstem. It is one of the principal processors of dopamine, a neurotransmitter that arouses desire and pleasure. High sensation seekers, Joseph explains, may require more stimulation than other people to get a dopamine hit.

After about half an hour, Honnold emerges from the scanner looking sleepily doe-eyed. Raised in Sacramento, California, he has a refreshingly frank manner of speaking, and an oddly contradictory demeanor that might be described as intensely laid back—his nickname is No Big Deal, which is his assessment of almost every experience he undergoes. Like most expert climbers, he is leanly muscled, more like a fitness buff than a body builder. The exceptions are his fingers, which permanently look as though they’ve just been slammed in a car door, and his forearms, which bring to mind Popeye.

“Looking at all those images—does that count as being under stress?” he asks Joseph.

“Those images that you saw are used pretty widely in the field for inducing fairly strong arousal responses,” Joseph replies.

“Because, I can’t say for sure, but I was like, whatever,”
he says. The photographs, even the “gruesome burning children and stuff” struck him as dated and jaded. “It’s like looking through a curio museum.”


“What do all the brain pictures mean?” Honnold asks, looking at the brightly colored fMRI images that Joseph has sent him. “Is my brain intact?”

“Your brain’s intact,” says Joseph. “And it’s quite interesting.”

Even to the untrained eye, the reason for her interest is clear. Joseph had used a control subject—a high-sensation-seeking male rock climber of similar age to Honnold—for comparison. Like Honnold, the control subject had described the scanner tasks as utterly unstimulating. Yet in the fMRI images of the two men’s responses to the high-arousal photographs, with brain activity indicated in electric purple, the control subject’s amygdala might as well be a neon sign. Honnold’s is gray. He shows zero activation.

Flip to the scans for the monetary reward task: Once again, the control subject’s amygdala and several other brain structures “look like a Christmas tree lit up,” Joseph says. In Honnold’s brain, the only activity is in the regions that process visual input, confirming only that he had been awake and looking at the screen. The rest of his brain is in lifeless black and white.

“There’s just not much going on in my brain,” Honnold muses. “It just doesn’t do anything.”


To see if she was somehow missing something, Joseph had tried dialing down the statistical threshold. She finally found a single voxel—the smallest volume of brain matter sampled by the scanner—that had lit up in the amygdala. By that point, though, real data was indistinguishable from error. “Nowhere, at a decent threshold, was there amygdala activation,” she says.

Could the same be happening as Honnold climbs ropeless into situations that would cause almost any other person to melt down in terror? Yes, says Joseph—in fact, that’s exactly what she thinks is going on. Where there is no activation, she says, there probably is no threat response. Honnold really does have an extraordinary brain, and he really could be feeling no fear up there. None at all. None whatsoever.
Image
User avatar
Capn'O
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 90,327
And1: 110,236
Joined: Dec 16, 2005
Location: Bone Goal
 

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#713 » by Capn'O » Fri May 24, 2019 3:17 pm

SelbyCobra wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
SelbyCobra wrote:Kawhi is definitely in the same brain chemistry/on the spectrum/mental health situation that Alex Honnold is. This stuff doesn't register to him the same way it does to normal human beings. The way he responds to figure of speech questions with literal answers is exactly the same. I'd wager if he had the same brain scan that Honnold did it would show very similar results.

Being that talented AND having his brain wired that way is absolutely terrifying as a fan of a team that doesn't have Kawhi Leonard on it.


That is a great comparison. Do you climb?


Not like you want me to if I answered yes. I go casually indoors. My kids love it though, and we actually go to the gym where Honnold learned to climb and train.

Here's a little more detail for anyone curious about the difference between learning to control your fear consciously, and the sort of genetic mutation that Honnold has which allows him to operate without the same mental restrictions most other humans have. They actually used a fellow climber as the control for the experiment, and he said similar things to Honnold about not having fear or reactions, but the scans showed wildly different results internally.

http://nautil.us/issue/39/sport/the-strange-brain-of-the-worlds-greatest-solo-climber

“I’m excited to see what his brain looks like,” she says, sitting in the control room behind leaded glass as the scan begins. “Then we’ll just check what his amygdala is doing, to see: Does he really have no fear?”

Often referred to as the brain’s fear center, the amygdala is more precisely the center of a threat response and interpretation system. It receives information on a straight pathway from our senses, which allows us to, for example, step back from an unexpected precipice without a moment’s conscious thought, and triggers a roster of other bodily responses familiar to almost everyone: racing heartbeat, sweaty palms, tunnel vision, loss of appetite. Meanwhile, the amygdala sends information up the line for higher processing in the cortical structures of the brain, where it may be translated into the conscious emotion we call fear.


Inside the tube, Honnold is looking at a series of about 200 images that flick past at the speed of channel surfing. The photographs are meant to disturb or excite. “At least in non-Alex people, these would evoke a strong response in the amygdala,” says Joseph. “I can’t bear to look at some of them, to be honest.” The selection includes corpses with their facial features bloodily reorganized; a toilet choked with feces; a woman shaving herself, Brazilian style; and two invigorating mountain-climbing scenes.

“Maybe his amygdala is not firing—he’s having no internal reactions to these stimuli,” says Joseph. “But it could be the case that he has such a well-honed regulatory system that he can say, ‘OK, I’m feeling all this stuff, my amygdala is going off,’ but his frontal cortex is just so powerful that it can calm him down.”

There is also a more existential question. “Why does he do this?” she says. “He knows it’s life-threatening—I’m sure people tell him every day. So there may be some kind of really strong reward, like the thrill of it is very rewarding.”

To find out, Honnold is now running through a second experiment, the “reward task,” in the scanner. He can win or lose small amounts of money (the most he can win is $22) depending on how quickly he clicks a button when signaled. “It’s a task that we know activates the reward circuitry very strongly in the rest of us,” Joseph says.

In this case, she’s looking most closely at another brain apparatus, the nucleus accumbens, located not far from the amygdala (which is also at play in the reward circuitry) near the top of the brainstem. It is one of the principal processors of dopamine, a neurotransmitter that arouses desire and pleasure. High sensation seekers, Joseph explains, may require more stimulation than other people to get a dopamine hit.

After about half an hour, Honnold emerges from the scanner looking sleepily doe-eyed. Raised in Sacramento, California, he has a refreshingly frank manner of speaking, and an oddly contradictory demeanor that might be described as intensely laid back—his nickname is No Big Deal, which is his assessment of almost every experience he undergoes. Like most expert climbers, he is leanly muscled, more like a fitness buff than a body builder. The exceptions are his fingers, which permanently look as though they’ve just been slammed in a car door, and his forearms, which bring to mind Popeye.

“Looking at all those images—does that count as being under stress?” he asks Joseph.

“Those images that you saw are used pretty widely in the field for inducing fairly strong arousal responses,” Joseph replies.

“Because, I can’t say for sure, but I was like, whatever,”
he says. The photographs, even the “gruesome burning children and stuff” struck him as dated and jaded. “It’s like looking through a curio museum.”


“What do all the brain pictures mean?” Honnold asks, looking at the brightly colored fMRI images that Joseph has sent him. “Is my brain intact?”

“Your brain’s intact,” says Joseph. “And it’s quite interesting.”

Even to the untrained eye, the reason for her interest is clear. Joseph had used a control subject—a high-sensation-seeking male rock climber of similar age to Honnold—for comparison. Like Honnold, the control subject had described the scanner tasks as utterly unstimulating. Yet in the fMRI images of the two men’s responses to the high-arousal photographs, with brain activity indicated in electric purple, the control subject’s amygdala might as well be a neon sign. Honnold’s is gray. He shows zero activation.

Flip to the scans for the monetary reward task: Once again, the control subject’s amygdala and several other brain structures “look like a Christmas tree lit up,” Joseph says. In Honnold’s brain, the only activity is in the regions that process visual input, confirming only that he had been awake and looking at the screen. The rest of his brain is in lifeless black and white.

“There’s just not much going on in my brain,” Honnold muses. “It just doesn’t do anything.”


To see if she was somehow missing something, Joseph had tried dialing down the statistical threshold. She finally found a single voxel—the smallest volume of brain matter sampled by the scanner—that had lit up in the amygdala. By that point, though, real data was indistinguishable from error. “Nowhere, at a decent threshold, was there amygdala activation,” she says.

Could the same be happening as Honnold climbs ropeless into situations that would cause almost any other person to melt down in terror? Yes, says Joseph—in fact, that’s exactly what she thinks is going on. Where there is no activation, she says, there probably is no threat response. Honnold really does have an extraordinary brain, and he really could be feeling no fear up there. None at all. None whatsoever.


That's fascinating. I hadn't read it but exactly what I would have expected. There's no aspect of what he does that's thrill seeking. He's solving a puzzle.

Not like you want me to if I answered yes.


So you know the deal, even with limited experience, about having to quell initial fears for each step of this and likely ultimately being comfortable with certain aspects of the sport only to find a new, more complex situation where fear is induced. Yeah, Alex never went through any of that. It's hard to even fathom.

It's in the past for me... for now. Two young children = no time to climb :-( Until they can get on the wall.
BAF Clippers:
UNDER CONSTRUCTION

:beer:
User avatar
SelbyCobra
RealGM
Posts: 10,462
And1: 20,551
Joined: May 25, 2011

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#714 » by SelbyCobra » Fri May 24, 2019 3:40 pm

Capn'O wrote:
SelbyCobra wrote:
Capn'O wrote:
That is a great comparison. Do you climb?


Not like you want me to if I answered yes. I go casually indoors. My kids love it though, and we actually go to the gym where Honnold learned to climb and train.

Here's a little more detail for anyone curious about the difference between learning to control your fear consciously, and the sort of genetic mutation that Honnold has which allows him to operate without the same mental restrictions most other humans have. They actually used a fellow climber as the control for the experiment, and he said similar things to Honnold about not having fear or reactions, but the scans showed wildly different results internally.

http://nautil.us/issue/39/sport/the-strange-brain-of-the-worlds-greatest-solo-climber

“I’m excited to see what his brain looks like,” she says, sitting in the control room behind leaded glass as the scan begins. “Then we’ll just check what his amygdala is doing, to see: Does he really have no fear?”

Often referred to as the brain’s fear center, the amygdala is more precisely the center of a threat response and interpretation system. It receives information on a straight pathway from our senses, which allows us to, for example, step back from an unexpected precipice without a moment’s conscious thought, and triggers a roster of other bodily responses familiar to almost everyone: racing heartbeat, sweaty palms, tunnel vision, loss of appetite. Meanwhile, the amygdala sends information up the line for higher processing in the cortical structures of the brain, where it may be translated into the conscious emotion we call fear.


Inside the tube, Honnold is looking at a series of about 200 images that flick past at the speed of channel surfing. The photographs are meant to disturb or excite. “At least in non-Alex people, these would evoke a strong response in the amygdala,” says Joseph. “I can’t bear to look at some of them, to be honest.” The selection includes corpses with their facial features bloodily reorganized; a toilet choked with feces; a woman shaving herself, Brazilian style; and two invigorating mountain-climbing scenes.

“Maybe his amygdala is not firing—he’s having no internal reactions to these stimuli,” says Joseph. “But it could be the case that he has such a well-honed regulatory system that he can say, ‘OK, I’m feeling all this stuff, my amygdala is going off,’ but his frontal cortex is just so powerful that it can calm him down.”

There is also a more existential question. “Why does he do this?” she says. “He knows it’s life-threatening—I’m sure people tell him every day. So there may be some kind of really strong reward, like the thrill of it is very rewarding.”

To find out, Honnold is now running through a second experiment, the “reward task,” in the scanner. He can win or lose small amounts of money (the most he can win is $22) depending on how quickly he clicks a button when signaled. “It’s a task that we know activates the reward circuitry very strongly in the rest of us,” Joseph says.

In this case, she’s looking most closely at another brain apparatus, the nucleus accumbens, located not far from the amygdala (which is also at play in the reward circuitry) near the top of the brainstem. It is one of the principal processors of dopamine, a neurotransmitter that arouses desire and pleasure. High sensation seekers, Joseph explains, may require more stimulation than other people to get a dopamine hit.

After about half an hour, Honnold emerges from the scanner looking sleepily doe-eyed. Raised in Sacramento, California, he has a refreshingly frank manner of speaking, and an oddly contradictory demeanor that might be described as intensely laid back—his nickname is No Big Deal, which is his assessment of almost every experience he undergoes. Like most expert climbers, he is leanly muscled, more like a fitness buff than a body builder. The exceptions are his fingers, which permanently look as though they’ve just been slammed in a car door, and his forearms, which bring to mind Popeye.

“Looking at all those images—does that count as being under stress?” he asks Joseph.

“Those images that you saw are used pretty widely in the field for inducing fairly strong arousal responses,” Joseph replies.

“Because, I can’t say for sure, but I was like, whatever,”
he says. The photographs, even the “gruesome burning children and stuff” struck him as dated and jaded. “It’s like looking through a curio museum.”


“What do all the brain pictures mean?” Honnold asks, looking at the brightly colored fMRI images that Joseph has sent him. “Is my brain intact?”

“Your brain’s intact,” says Joseph. “And it’s quite interesting.”

Even to the untrained eye, the reason for her interest is clear. Joseph had used a control subject—a high-sensation-seeking male rock climber of similar age to Honnold—for comparison. Like Honnold, the control subject had described the scanner tasks as utterly unstimulating. Yet in the fMRI images of the two men’s responses to the high-arousal photographs, with brain activity indicated in electric purple, the control subject’s amygdala might as well be a neon sign. Honnold’s is gray. He shows zero activation.

Flip to the scans for the monetary reward task: Once again, the control subject’s amygdala and several other brain structures “look like a Christmas tree lit up,” Joseph says. In Honnold’s brain, the only activity is in the regions that process visual input, confirming only that he had been awake and looking at the screen. The rest of his brain is in lifeless black and white.

“There’s just not much going on in my brain,” Honnold muses. “It just doesn’t do anything.”


To see if she was somehow missing something, Joseph had tried dialing down the statistical threshold. She finally found a single voxel—the smallest volume of brain matter sampled by the scanner—that had lit up in the amygdala. By that point, though, real data was indistinguishable from error. “Nowhere, at a decent threshold, was there amygdala activation,” she says.

Could the same be happening as Honnold climbs ropeless into situations that would cause almost any other person to melt down in terror? Yes, says Joseph—in fact, that’s exactly what she thinks is going on. Where there is no activation, she says, there probably is no threat response. Honnold really does have an extraordinary brain, and he really could be feeling no fear up there. None at all. None whatsoever.


That's fascinating. I hadn't read it but exactly what I would have expected. There's no aspect of what he does that's thrill seeking. He's solving a puzzle.

Not like you want me to if I answered yes.


So you know the deal, even with limited experience, about having to quell initial fears for each step of this and likely ultimately being comfortable with certain aspects of the sport only to find a new, more complex situation where fear is induced. Yeah, Alex never went through any of that. It's hard to even fathom.

It's in the past for me... for now. Two young children = no time to climb :-( Until they can get on the wall.


Yeah, it can get really hairy up high - even indoors with ropes. There are some great walls just randomly around here in NorCal, and I have a friend who used to teach in Yosemite that takes the kids up to these baby walls. It's pretty cool.

That puzzle analogy is a good one. I mean, I have no idea if this is really what is going on with Kawhi, but it sure looks REALLY similar to what we see from Honnold. Compare Kawhi to another unflappable NBA player - Dame.

After Lillard hit his shot against OKC and made that famous face he was asked about it, and his response was about how he's from Oakland and he's learned not to react to that kind of stimulus - the "it's just what I do" response. He understands the question and can explain why he is different.

Kawhi, like Honnold, responds to these type of questions amazed at his accomplishments with confusion, because he can't understand the question as he didn't experience the event the same way everyone else in the arena did - it wasn't the same event to him that we saw.
Image
User avatar
HarthorneWingo
RealGM
Posts: 97,387
And1: 62,517
Joined: May 16, 2005
Location: In Your Head, USA
   

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#715 » by HarthorneWingo » Fri May 24, 2019 4:32 pm

thebuzzardman wrote:
aq_ua wrote:
Fat Kat wrote:
Image

It’s true. We have never compared or ranked or taken sides or exhibited any bias towards any Knick player in comparison to another. They are our children and all equal in our eyes.


:D


:lol: I really don't remember that. What I do remember is TKF and the whole Melo vs. Gallo thing. But as I type this, it is coming back to me that when I criticized Gallo's game, he accused me of being a troll, etc. But I wasn't comparing Chandler to him. I would just critique - constructively, I maintain - Gallo's game.

Anyhow, who cares? AND WHY DO WE HAVE SOME LAKERS' FAN COMING ONTO OUR FORUM AND DERAILING ONE OF OUR THREADS???? (Samuel L. Jackson voice)
Free Palestine
User avatar
Fat Kat
RealGM
Posts: 34,999
And1: 35,850
Joined: Apr 19, 2004
     

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#716 » by Fat Kat » Fri May 24, 2019 9:54 pm

Remember this?
Image
All comments made by Fat Kat are given as opinion, which may or may not be derived from facts, and not made to personally attack anyone on Realgm. All rights reserved.®
knicksNOTslick
RealGM
Posts: 17,869
And1: 5,173
Joined: Jun 15, 2002
Location: NYC Queens
     

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#717 » by knicksNOTslick » Fri May 24, 2019 10:24 pm

I remember the Gallo v. Chandler days. I was a big fan of both. Chandler was the more consistent player, Gallo more up and down but with the higher ceiling. And it didn't really matter at the end, just like how our young players won't matter now since they will once again just be trade assets.
spree2kawhi
RealGM
Posts: 12,567
And1: 5,711
Joined: Mar 01, 2005

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#718 » by spree2kawhi » Sat May 25, 2019 5:11 am

Fat Kat wrote:Remember this?
Image

I remember how convinced I was on day one of his move there that they wouldn't make it. It was one of the best seasons in the recent NBA for me personally. Great players succeeded, great morons were put together on the Lakers. LeBron and the Balls deserve each other.

Their assets suck big time. I also think everybody knows that Hart is only a very, very poor man's Danny Green, Kuzma the worst second option in the league and Lonzo, well, is basically nobody. They'll make some trade, but not for AD so I'll kick back, relax and watch LeBron go into the season big-mouthing it again, miss the playoffs again this year - only this time with the fake hair added to the fake hustle. On his very own GOAT claim I call bluff.

This is a band of freak morons that deserve each other and there wasn't ever anything like this bunch of clowns before. What a circus.
User avatar
robillionaire
RealGM
Posts: 39,978
And1: 57,368
Joined: Jul 12, 2015
Location: Asheville
     

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#719 » by robillionaire » Sat May 25, 2019 8:17 pm

I believe they would have made the playoffs had Lebron not gotten injured
Thugger HBC
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 49,679
And1: 18,760
Joined: Jan 14, 2011
Location: Defense+efficient offense=titles...what do you have?
       

Re: Around the NBA - Blazing into the Conference Finals 

Post#720 » by Thugger HBC » Sun May 26, 2019 12:01 am

Best thing to happen to the Knicks would be Kyrie going to Brooklyn.
R. I. P. Mamba 8/23/78 - 1/26/20

Gone, but will never be forgotten

Return to New York Knicks