Chislic wrote:This is not a who's better post, (Gallo/Fields) but rather my strategic point of view... and something I feel gets overlooked in the discussion on this board.
Fields is our starting SG AND our 2nd best rebounder on a team that ranks 19th overall in rebounds in the league. Trading Chandler AND Gallinari makes more sense to me. Both guys play the same position (same as Carmelo as well), we loose less rebounding and only one starter.
Who knows what we'll get in return, but it would be devastating to loose our 2nd and 3rd best rebounders.
RPG
8.6 - (PF/C) Amar'eStoudemire
7.2 - (SG) Landry Fields
5.9 - (SF) Wison Chandler <
4.6 - (SF) Danilo Gallinari <
3.6 - (PG) Raymond Felton
7.7 - (SF) Carmelo AnthonyFields had the best Defensive Rebound Percentage (20.1%) of any Knick who plays in the regular rotation, including Amar’e Stoudemire. Stoudemire is second at 19.5%.Fields’ DReb% is not only outstanding for a guard, but it would be a very good mark even for a big man. If he were one percentage point higher at 21.1%, he would crack the Top-20 in the NBA. None of the Top-20 is shorter than 6-foot-9 and all of them are either centers or power forwards, except for Josh Smith and Lamar Odom, who play both forward positions.This has been a crucial – and completely unexpected – contribution to the Knicks, who are not a good rebounding team as a whole and who would be in even worse shape without Fields.
I love fields and not knocking him, he does many things very well and should only improve. but those 7.2 rebounds are very scewed. He usually gets at least 3 rebounds a game off missed Free Throws. Watch and you will see. Most teams just let them big men get those rebounds but the knicks let landry swoop in a get them. FT rebounds are just stat padding rebounds as usually no one is trying to get the offensive rebounds.
Trust me watch every FT miss and see what im talking about, he would be averging 4-5 rebounds a game without those gimme FT rebounds.

















