sol537 wrote:I'm holding out hope for a Randle + IQ for Zion deal... Zion + RJ + Brunson would be a nice trio to build around...
I don’t trust Zion to be healthy enough to compete for championships one day.
Moderators: mpharris36, j4remi, HerSports85, NoLayupRule, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks
sol537 wrote:I'm holding out hope for a Randle + IQ for Zion deal... Zion + RJ + Brunson would be a nice trio to build around...
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.
sol537 wrote:RHODEY wrote:But you are replacing a team engine (albeit flawed) with a role player (albeit elite). Addition by subtraction can only go so far imo.sol537 wrote:
It's purely a salary/Randle dump in the hopes that we could clear cap for a free agency play for OG this off-season (since TOR isn't trading him to us any time soon). I'd rather OG than Jerami Grant at the same or comparable salary TBH.
OG in place of Randle could be the move before the “final” move. It would also open things up for everyone else to grow… similar to what we’re seeing in Philly once they dumped Harden. IMO of course. Randle is a net negative.
cgf wrote:Another trade board idea from a Kings fan:
NY out - Fournier, 2 2nds
NY IN - Barnes
Sac out - Barnes, Mitchell, 2 2nds
Sac in - Collins
Utah out - Collins
Utah in - Fournier, Mitchell, 4 2nds
Post-trade Lineup:
Brunson | Quickley | McBride
Grimes | DiVincenzo
Barrett | Hart
Randle | Barnes
Robinson | Hartenstein | Sims
spree2kawhi wrote:sol537 wrote:I'm holding out hope for a Randle + IQ for Zion deal... Zion + RJ + Brunson would be a nice trio to build around...
I don’t trust Zion to be healthy enough to compete for championships one day.
HarthorneWingo wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:sol537 wrote:I'm holding out hope for a Randle + IQ for Zion deal... Zion + RJ + Brunson would be a nice trio to build around...
I don’t trust Zion to be healthy enough to compete for championships one day.
I want to see 2 years of healthy Zion before I'd consider seeking to acquire him. When does he become a free agent?
sol537 wrote:Randle + IQ + protected 1st for Zion
Randle for Isaac + Ingles (expiring)
Randle for Hayward + protected 1st
IQ for Herb Jones straight up
IQ + Fournier for OG (with promise to extend)
Any of these deals would be OK with me.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:spree2kawhi wrote:I don’t trust Zion to be healthy enough to compete for championships one day.
I want to see 2 years of healthy Zion before I'd consider seeking to acquire him. When does he become a free agent?
Problem is if we see 2 years of healthy Zion, then he is more than likely not getting traded unfortunately.
The only reason, as of now, that he would be available is because NOP doesn't trust his health/work ethic. If he turns that part of himself around they would be stupid to trade him tbh as long as he wants to be there.
HarthorneWingo wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:I want to see 2 years of healthy Zion before I'd consider seeking to acquire him. When does he become a free agent?
Problem is if we see 2 years of healthy Zion, then he is more than likely not getting traded unfortunately.
The only reason, as of now, that he would be available is because NOP doesn't trust his health/work ethic. If he turns that part of himself around they would be stupid to trade him tbh as long as he wants to be there.
Is Zion available now?
cgf wrote:Another trade board idea from a Kings fan:
NY out - Fournier, 2 2nds
NY IN - Barnes
Sac out - Barnes, Mitchell, 2 2nds
Sac in - Collins
Utah out - Collins
Utah in - Fournier, Mitchell, 4 2nds
Post-trade Lineup:
Brunson | Quickley | McBride
Grimes | DiVincenzo
Barrett | Hart
Randle | Barnes
Robinson | Hartenstein | Sims
Polk377 wrote:Knicks don't need a major move. They need one more spark plug offensive player at the wing. Go get Bojan Bogdonovic. He is the perfect complimentary piece off the bench to go along with IQ. He is a flamethrower and what we thought Fournier was going to be.
Jalen Bluntson wrote:Polk377 wrote:Knicks don't need a major move. They need one more spark plug offensive player at the wing. Go get Bojan Bogdonovic. He is the perfect complimentary piece off the bench to go along with IQ. He is a flamethrower and what we thought Fournier was going to be.
Does he play defense?
Polk377 wrote:Knicks don't need a major move. They need one more spark plug offensive player at the wing. Go get Bojan Bogdonovic. He is the perfect complimentary piece off the bench to go along with IQ. He is a flamethrower and what we thought Fournier was going to be.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Polk377 wrote:Knicks don't need a major move. They need one more spark plug offensive player at the wing. Go get Bojan Bogdonovic. He is the perfect complimentary piece off the bench to go along with IQ. He is a flamethrower and what we thought Fournier was going to be.
Think it would be a good move for maximizing THIS roster, but giving up another 1st for a rental seems short sighted in my opinion. Especially, one that is 34 going on 35 this year and is having soft tissue injury issues to start the season. If they want Fournier and a couple 2nds or something like that, then maybe it makes a little more sense. But also how many minutes is he truly going to get here as long as Randle is still here? He's getting too old to guard 3's and Thibs never would run a Bojan/Randle 4/5 frontcourt.
Just seems like we'd be paying a premium for a guy who is destined to get at most 20 mpg.
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Polk377 wrote:Knicks don't need a major move. They need one more spark plug offensive player at the wing. Go get Bojan Bogdonovic. He is the perfect complimentary piece off the bench to go along with IQ. He is a flamethrower and what we thought Fournier was going to be.
Think it would be a good move for maximizing THIS roster, but giving up another 1st for a rental seems short sighted in my opinion. Especially, one that is 34 going on 35 this year and is having soft tissue injury issues to start the season. If they want Fournier and a couple 2nds or something like that, then maybe it makes a little more sense. But also how many minutes is he truly going to get here as long as Randle is still here? He's getting too old to guard 3's and Thibs never would run a Bojan/Randle 4/5 frontcourt.
Just seems like we'd be paying a premium for a guy who is destined to get at most 20 mpg.
sol537 wrote:Knicksfan1992 wrote:Polk377 wrote:Knicks don't need a major move. They need one more spark plug offensive player at the wing. Go get Bojan Bogdonovic. He is the perfect complimentary piece off the bench to go along with IQ. He is a flamethrower and what we thought Fournier was going to be.
Think it would be a good move for maximizing THIS roster, but giving up another 1st for a rental seems short sighted in my opinion. Especially, one that is 34 going on 35 this year and is having soft tissue injury issues to start the season. If they want Fournier and a couple 2nds or something like that, then maybe it makes a little more sense. But also how many minutes is he truly going to get here as long as Randle is still here? He's getting too old to guard 3's and Thibs never would run a Bojan/Randle 4/5 frontcourt.
Just seems like we'd be paying a premium for a guy who is destined to get at most 20 mpg.
Plus, his minutes would have to come from somewhere... 3 mins from Randle, 2 from Hart, 2 from DDV, 5 from Grimes, 2 from RJ... 12 mins available at most? Having too many guys leads to complaints and locker room chemistry issues.

Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
HarthorneWingo wrote:cgf wrote:Another trade board idea from a Kings fan:
NY out - Fournier, 2 2nds
NY IN - Barnes
Sac out - Barnes, Mitchell, 2 2nds
Sac in - Collins
Utah out - Collins
Utah in - Fournier, Mitchell, 4 2nds
Post-trade Lineup:
Brunson | Quickley | McBride
Grimes | DiVincenzo
Barrett | Hart
Randle | Barnes
Robinson | Hartenstein | Sims
Fournier and "Obi" for Harrison Barnes. Sign me up.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.