KnickFan33 wrote:dakomish23 wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:
Knicks keep turning the roster over, turning the coaches over, and yet still play offense a certain way and tend to have the same issues on defense? Yet who is the constant? I've generally supported Melo but it's time to see what the issue is.
Players can be good but ultimately not that conducive to good teams. Part of it is the Knicks, always firing coaches and trying another. But the teams sure do seem to quit or tune coaches out here pretty damn quick. I'm not saying Melo led the revolt on Woodson. He lost the team; it was clear as day. But it sure seems to be a trend that coaches get tuned out pretty quick. Some of them deserve it, others maybe not.
Could the reason that they have to keep turning the roster over is because the guys they had arent that good but were asked to do way more than possible because this FO sucks? Have you ever seen a top player have such pathetic help?
Toney Douglas as your staring PG in 11-12 is Melo's fault? Amare taking 33% of the cap to play 33% of the game is his fault too? At his peak he dragged a team with Felton as the starter & JR as the #2 option to 54 wins. And folks here are giving the credit to Sheed and Camby

did Melo make the Bargs deal? That's one of the worst deals in recent NBA history.
Melo's had the worst year of his career to date. No denying that. But this idea that it's his fault that the roster keeps changing or that a new GM puts in his coach m, then fires that coach (!!!!!) is ridiculous.
But someone has to be the scapegoat. I can't wait till Melo is gone and maybe you will put the blame where it should be. Melo shouldn't be absolved but he is far from the main culprit in this script
Folks are literally putting years of foolish FO management on Melo.
I think the reason is more the fan base. As the saying goes... "You can't rebuild in New York."
For the most part, I think moves made have been focused towards pleasing the casual fan base. And what placates the casual fan? Big names, regardless of how they may affect a team.
What other plausible reason would there be to sign Noah to such a ludicrous contract?
If you look at all the FO decisions made since the Melo trade, how many of them would rank amongst the worst 50 of all teams combined over that time period?
Opting into Billups, only to amnesty him. So then you couldn't amnesty Amare to get Melo help in his prime
Letting Lin go for nothing
Trading picks to give contracts that you end up wanting to dump anyway - Camby / Felton, I'm sure I'm missing folks
The Bargs deal - which to me is the worst trade in the last 5 years. Absolutely zero value from it. Can't even do a ratio of value to cost because the value is zero.
The Tyson trade that literally gave us nothing back. Not one piece is on this team 2 years later.
Now the Noah deal
Not sure how folks don't see all the monumental failures of this franchise and instead say, "F u Melo, a true champion would make this work".
Newsflash - the best players would of left this god forsaken franchise in 2014 with zero regrets