Billy Goat wrote:Synciere wrote:Billy Goat wrote:
Shooting/efficiency is what maters most. This is black and white data. Porzingis' output was not that of a franchise/max player. The Knicks would be winning more if it were.
And if you were a Mavericks fan during Dirk's early years you'd say rebounding and defense matters most. And if you were a Celtics' fan during the Pierce and Walker years you'd say shooting and defense matters most. Again, you're picking and choosing where he's deficient and ignoring the areas where he's strong to fit your argument. It's not his output that's an impediment to the Knicks winning lol...
He's deficient at essentially everything besides blocks. Investing max money into that type of output would be insane if the goal is to win. We're already handicapped by the terrible Hardaway and Noah contracts.
No, he's not. LOL. He's a 23/7/2 guy on 44/39/79 percentages. Those are all above average numbers (sans the shooting percentage, but his TS% is higher). Maybe you want to say he's not elite, okay. He ranks 33rd in PER. Just checked. Guys like Whiteside (ranked 10th) are ahead of guys like Embiid and Cousins and Irving, so you can take the numbers with a grain of salt. Regardless, he's a top 30 player by ANY measure, which makes him a part of the top 6% in the league. He's in the 93rd or 94th percentile of players LOL. If he's deficient in everything besides blocks give me more deficient players ANY DAY. Don't trust the numbers? The eye test doesn't lie either.