ImageImageImageImageImage

Not getting Paul Was the biggest blessing in disguise?

Moderators: GONYK, j4remi, NoLayupRule, Deeeez Knicks, Jeff Van Gully, mpharris36, dakomish23, HerSports85

Knicksfan20
RealGM
Posts: 18,678
And1: 5,759
Joined: Aug 19, 2006

Re: Not getting Paul Was the biggest blessing in disguise? 

Post#81 » by Knicksfan20 » Thu Feb 9, 2012 9:39 pm

Sprewell4Three wrote:This post only makes sense if Lin continues to play well. After 3 games we cannot say that he will for sure. Lets give it some more time before making proclamations...

This is what i have with other Knicks fans, ya'll so quick to make predictions and what not. Shumpert was Wade 2.0, Fields was a future all star, Frye was the next KG, etc etc
STOP IT ! ALREADY STOP! don't you guys ever learn?


Stop exagerating. I remember Fryes rookie year and nobody compared him to KG. People didnt want to trade him in a deal for KG because people thought Fryce could be an all star, but nobody compared him to KG. Their games were totally different. And frye did look like a future all star.

NObody said Shump was Wade 2.0 first off. There is a difference between saying a player has potential or athletic ability like Wade, and then proclaiming he will be wade. And Shump is a ROOKIE, love how you rule him out already after 20 games.

Fields a future all star? Lol..ok. I do not remember hearing that one.

Just stop it. STOP IT ALREADY. your reaching dude.
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,653
And1: 2,859
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: Not getting Paul Was the biggest blessing in disguise? 

Post#82 » by NoStatsGuy » Thu Feb 9, 2012 10:13 pm

The hype is crazy
im bout dat action boss

Return to New York Knicks