Capn'O wrote:2010 wrote:All i know is during last year’s draft, all I heard from many of y’all was “next year’s draft is gonna be lit af. Wings galore. Mad swingmen to choose from!”
Fast forward to now and y’all are saying this is a weak 1-man draft with the best player being a PF and not even a wing. Everyone likes the PF and either of the two best PG’s (Morant and Garland) and y’all are super meh about the wings.
Zion has, in a sense, really warped people's perception of the draft. He's REALLY good and then there are a bunch of players who either are or could be pretty good.
But I'm not saying everything. **** having the 13th pick. **** try hards.
The downside to trading down is the added layer of having to isolate the right selection at that lower pick, which by nature means going against the grain because if there was a consensus he would have been gone before getting TO the lower pick.
I know you're not arguing against this, I'm just adding to your point that drafting an impact player outside of the top tier isn't just a matter of getting a lower pick - there's so much that goes into getting that guy at a later point in the draft, from scouting, to luck, to years of development after the pick.
There's a reason that teams have to add in so much when trying to move up. On the very basic, Captain Obvious level there's simply much higher reliability of getting it right as you pick from the top tier.