god shammgod wrote:gotta win this. if not melo will probably make the next game thread and we'll be subjected to more of his music that nobody likes.
you need to tell the players this. The dread will inspire them
Moderators: j4remi, NoLayupRule, HerSports85, GONYK, Jeff Van Gully, dakomish23, Deeeez Knicks, mpharris36
god shammgod wrote:gotta win this. if not melo will probably make the next game thread and we'll be subjected to more of his music that nobody likes.
HarthorneWingo wrote:dukeknicksirish wrote:I’ll be in attendance !!
Good seats?

god shammgod wrote:gotta win this. if not melo will probably make the next game thread and we'll be subjected to more of his music that nobody likes.

dukeknicksirish wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:dukeknicksirish wrote:I’ll be in attendance !!
Good seats?
Yah, one of my father's buddies is a new scout for the Knicks !
Iron Mantis wrote:Knicks will come out coked-up, guns blazing, and will build a double-digit lead at some point.
But have they learned anything? will they ratchet up the intensity to step on their necks?
Or is the quarterly 3-minute mark meltdown still in effect? Will they get sloppy and turn the ball over on consecutive possessions, giving up offensive rebounds, and go into hero mode and stop sharing the ball?
If they learned from their past mistakes, Knicks win tonight. If not, Double-digit L.
Iron Mantis wrote:Knicks will come out coked-up, guns blazing, and will build a double-digit lead at some point.
But have they learned anything? will they ratchet up the intensity to step on their necks?
Or is the quarterly 3-minute mark meltdown still in effect? Will they get sloppy and turn the ball over on consecutive possessions, giving up offensive rebounds, and go into hero mode and stop sharing the ball?
If they learned from their past mistakes, Knicks win tonight. If not, Double-digit L.


blueNorange wrote:anyone listen to bart and hahn yesterday?
bart scott said that what we're seeing with the knicks is randle, who was the guy last year, trying to remain being the #1 guy because the alpha male in rj barrett is here, and that rj barrett is the guy.
you could tell it in the tone with their post game comments, rj barrett spoke on behalf of the team and called everyone out that losing at home is unacceptable.
HarthorneWingo wrote:dukeknicksirish wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:
Good seats?
Yah, one of my father's buddies is a new scout for the Knicks !
I always knew you and I would become great friends.
JXL wrote:blueNorange wrote:anyone listen to bart and hahn yesterday?
bart scott said that what we're seeing with the knicks is randle, who was the guy last year, trying to remain being the #1 guy because the alpha male in rj barrett is here, and that rj barrett is the guy.
you could tell it in the tone with their post game comments, rj barrett spoke on behalf of the team and called everyone out that losing at home is unacceptable.
So is Randle getting aggravated that RJ is becoming the #1 option, and Randle has to take a backseat?

Clyde_Style wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:dukeknicksirish wrote:
Yah, one of my father's buddies is a new scout for the Knicks !
I always knew you and I would become great friends.
Wipe that chit off your nose!
Knicksfan1992 wrote:Julius always dominates Sabonis.
Expecting LeVert to get the RJ treatment. Good matchup for RJ to assert himself defensively.
Can't let Brogdon get off if he plays and Mitch has to stay disciplined on Turner.
blueNorange wrote:JXL wrote:blueNorange wrote:anyone listen to bart and hahn yesterday?
bart scott said that what we're seeing with the knicks is randle, who was the guy last year, trying to remain being the #1 guy because the alpha male in rj barrett is here, and that rj barrett is the guy.
you could tell it in the tone with their post game comments, rj barrett spoke on behalf of the team and called everyone out that losing at home is unacceptable.
So is Randle getting aggravated that RJ is becoming the #1 option, and Randle has to take a backseat?
no, not at all — that’s now what they were saying
they’re saying randle has to adjust and he’s not ready yet. but they can definitely both share the majority of shots, they have to find a balance.
rj is an alpha male, that’s why he’s good
blueNorange wrote:JXL wrote:blueNorange wrote:anyone listen to bart and hahn yesterday?
bart scott said that what we're seeing with the knicks is randle, who was the guy last year, trying to remain being the #1 guy because the alpha male in rj barrett is here, and that rj barrett is the guy.
you could tell it in the tone with their post game comments, rj barrett spoke on behalf of the team and called everyone out that losing at home is unacceptable.
So is Randle getting aggravated that RJ is becoming the #1 option, and Randle has to take a backseat?
no, not at all — that’s now what they were saying
they’re saying randle has to adjust and he’s not ready yet. but they can definitely both share the majority of shots, they have to find a balance.
rj is an alpha male, that’s why he’s good
RHODEY wrote:blueNorange wrote:JXL wrote:
So is Randle getting aggravated that RJ is becoming the #1 option, and Randle has to take a backseat?
no, not at all — that’s now what they were saying
they’re saying randle has to adjust and he’s not ready yet. but they can definitely both share the majority of shots, they have to find a balance.
rj is an alpha male, that’s why he’s good
Normally I would think internal competition is good for a team. But Randle doesn't seem to handle it well, nor does IQ....If Rj continues to improve, do he and Randle really fit together? Does Randle fit better than say (a healthy) Zion?
