RealGM

Clyde_Style wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:Brunson uses footwork, physicality, change of pace and touch/skill to score.

RJ's going to get better at the first 3, at the minimum, having Brunson around to observe and also be taught by. Might take a couple of years, but he'll elevate RJ's individual game.

In the meantime, Brunson actually being a quality player at PG will elevate the play of RJ and Randle, or at least make them more efficient by getting them better looks.

Moar posts like this

blueNorange wrote:i still can't wrap my mind around the knicks punting the draft for absolutely no reason at all.

this is one of the first time i'm like not interested in this team, they're gonna suck ... there's like 8-9 teams way better than them in the east.

they still have bum ass randle that'll still walk the ball up the court and take 16 seconds doing it.
they still have thibs who will not play anyone

derrick rose gonna get more playing time than quickly and grimes.

Snacks wrote:

blueNorange wrote:i still can't wrap my mind around the knicks punting the draft for absolutely no reason at all.

this is one of the first time i'm like not interested in this team, they're gonna suck ... there's like 8-9 teams way better than them in the east.

they still have bum ass randle that'll still walk the ball up the court and take 16 seconds doing it.
they still have thibs who will not play anyone

derrick rose gonna get more playing time than quickly and grimes.

Im not there yet. but I'm almost there. They choose Randle over Obi and Frenchy over Cam and Rose over whoever I don't know what I'll do.

TheGreenArrow wrote:

Snacks wrote:

blueNorange wrote:i still can't wrap my mind around the knicks punting the draft for absolutely no reason at all.

this is one of the first time i'm like not interested in this team, they're gonna suck ... there's like 8-9 teams way better than them in the east.

they still have bum ass randle that'll still walk the ball up the court and take 16 seconds doing it.
they still have thibs who will not play anyone

derrick rose gonna get more playing time than quickly and grimes.

Im not there yet. but I'm almost there. They choose Randle over Obi and Frenchy over Cam and Rose over whoever I don't know what I'll do.

Read on Twitter

Brunson & Julius are cooking Folksssssss!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

N Y K wrote:I just hope I have something fun to watch next year.

Stannis wrote:Not tryna be over dramatic or anything... I honestly think the Jalen Brunson signing will go down as not only the best signing in NYK history, but the greatest signing in NBA history.

Guano wrote:

N Y K wrote:I just hope I have something fun to watch next year.

our f'ing standards.

Clyde_Style wrote:

Guano wrote:

N Y K wrote:I just hope I have something fun to watch next year.

our f'ing standards.

That's a rational standard. If they are fun to watch again that would mean they are playing well enough to compete. Why are you mocking them for saying that?

thebuzzardman wrote:Just a reminder

Watch on YouTube

Guano wrote:

Clyde_Style wrote:

Guano wrote:

our f'ing standards.

That's a rational standard. If they are fun to watch again that would mean they are playing well enough to compete. Why are you mocking them for saying that?

Clyde_Style wrote:

Guano wrote:

Clyde_Style wrote:
That's a rational standard. If they are fun to watch again that would mean they are playing well enough to compete. Why are you mocking them for saying that?

The syntax doesn't change what you implied or what I asked. It was mocking a perfectly rational thing to say. I certainly want to have fun watching my team play even if they are not contending

Guano wrote:

Clyde_Style wrote:

Guano wrote:

The syntax doesn't change what you implied or what I asked. It was mocking a perfectly rational thing to say. I certainly want to have fun watching my team play even if they are not contending

it's embarrassing the knicks can make the game of basketball which is a genuinely fun sport boring. so for our standards to be just having fun watching it is comical. pretty easy to understand if you don't take everything on the web as an insult.

Clyde_Style wrote:

Guano wrote:

Clyde_Style wrote:
The syntax doesn't change what you implied or what I asked. It was mocking a perfectly rational thing to say. I certainly want to have fun watching my team play even if they are not contending

it's embarrassing the knicks can make the game of basketball which is a genuinely fun sport boring. so for our standards to be just having fun watching it is comical. pretty easy to understand if you don't take everything on the web as an insult.

OK, not trying to stir anything up. It has been so sour in here lately that it seems like a novel concept to have fun watching the Knicks. I'm turning my attention to what is, not what if. And what is seems like it could be pretty entertaining. I think we'll be better than the club from two seasons ago that made the playoffs. I know the East is better now, but we could have a roster that plays as a team and makes some noise. This girl just wants to have fun.

thebuzzardman wrote:Just a reminder

Watch on YouTube

stuporman wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:Just a reminder

Watch on YouTube

Weren't you calling him something like half Hakeem or midget dream shake just a couple weeks ago?

thebuzzardman wrote:

stuporman wrote:

thebuzzardman wrote:Just a reminder

Watch on YouTube

Weren't you calling him something like half Hakeem or midget dream shake just a couple weeks ago?

I have to give the haters, when they come out, some quality ammunition.

Guano wrote:

N Y K wrote:I just hope I have something fun to watch next year.

our f'ing standards.