Moderators: Deeeez Knicks, HerSports85, j4remi, NoLayupRule, GONYK, dakomish23, mpharris36, Jeff Van Gully
Jalen Bluntson wrote:robillionaire wrote:8-2 in the last 10. But 25th pick in the draft didn’t become Klay Thompson. The Isaiah Thomas years are clearly back. Fire everyone
8-2 because we have played garbage teams. We probably go 10-0 without the trade.
Reign23 wrote:mpharris36 wrote:HarthorneWingo wrote:I’m watching the Nuggets vs. Celtics game and I spending a lot of time focusing on Jamal Murray. And I’m like, he reminds me a lot of QG in terms of size and physique. So I’m thinking why cant Grimes turn into Murray? Even a poor man’s Murray would be fine.
One thing I noticed is that Murray plays much more free and easy whereas Grimes plays like if he makes a mistake, Thibs will sub him out.
The upshot is that I’m afraid that if we trade Grimes, he will flourish in a more conducive environment.
I understand that QG has made it know to the coaching staff that he’s very frustrated. I think that if we trade him, we’d be selling very low.
outside of there physical size and stature they have nothing similar in terms of there games. Murray has a ridiculous bag. Grimes is a C&S guy and attack close out guy. That is about.
Murray has a ridiculous layup package, step back jumper, and runs an elite P&R. Grimes can't do any of that.
just, completely this.
Jimmit79 wrote:Yea RJ played well he was definitely the x factor
duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Time to trade Brunson and Randle then, I guess.
Time to consider trading one of them. Knick management is apparently of a similar opinion, according to recent reports, and have considered moving Randle.
I'm willing to attempt to build a championship calibre team around Brunson - but that will require everyone else being adequate to excellent defenders. Of course, if Randle played far fewer minutes per night for a coach without a double standard, and who ran a real offense, maybe you would be able to hold him accountable on the defensive end (and thus make him a better player) - which Thibs refuses to do.
thebuzzardman wrote:I think the Knicks should trade both of them so they don't have to deal with even one flawed player. 5 non flawed players or nothing.
thebuzzardman wrote:duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:Time to trade Brunson and Randle then, I guess.
Time to consider trading one of them. Knick management is apparently of a similar opinion, according to recent reports, and have considered moving Randle.
I'm willing to attempt to build a championship calibre team around Brunson - but that will require everyone else being adequate to excellent defenders. Of course, if Randle played far fewer minutes per night for a coach without a double standard, and who ran a real offense, maybe you would be able to hold him accountable on the defensive end (and thus make him a better player) - which Thibs refuses to do.
I think the Knicks should trade both of them so they don't have to deal with even one flawed player. 5 non flawed players or nothing.
duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:I think the Knicks should trade both of them so they don't have to deal with even one flawed player. 5 non flawed players or nothing.
I think your constant trolling is tiresome - but who can account for taste, right?
thebuzzardman wrote:It's not any less tiresome than the constant binary takes on this forum. Nearly every stance is all or nothing. Jokes get jokes.
duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:It's not any less tiresome than the constant binary takes on this forum. Nearly every stance is all or nothing. Jokes get jokes.
Some people can't do nuance. I don't see you helping the problem. I see you only making it worse.
TheGreenArrow wrote:?s=46&t=W09F6FrMDfp5_y1gKYgF1g
From a jazz insider who’s usually been right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hard pass if it includes a 1st!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thebuzzardman wrote:duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:It's not any less tiresome than the constant binary takes on this forum. Nearly every stance is all or nothing. Jokes get jokes.
Some people can't do nuance. I don't see you helping the problem. I see you only making it worse.
That's what I'm here for!
thebuzzardman wrote:duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:It's not any less tiresome than the constant binary takes on this forum. Nearly every stance is all or nothing. Jokes get jokes.
Some people can't do nuance. I don't see you helping the problem. I see you only making it worse.
That's what I'm here for!
thebuzzardman wrote:duetta wrote:thebuzzardman wrote:I think the Knicks should trade both of them so they don't have to deal with even one flawed player. 5 non flawed players or nothing.
I think your constant trolling is tiresome - but who can account for taste, right?
It's not any less tiresome than the constant binary takes on this forum. Nearly every stance is all or nothing. Jokes get jokes.
RIP mags
Zenzibar wrote:
Ursusamericanus wrote:All jokes aside, how reliable is Robert Randolph? Does he actually have insider information?
robillionaire wrote:Ursusamericanus wrote:All jokes aside, how reliable is Robert Randolph? Does he actually have insider information?
He’s the least reliable source that ever existed. You can almost guarantee the opposite of whatever he says will happen
RIP mags
